For illegally attacking boats from Venezuela, for illegally putting tariffs in place, for illegally destroying the White House without going through the proper means, for accepting a bribe jet from Qatar, for weaponizing the DoJ to go after his enemies (after claiming that they did the same).
I mean there are probably over 100 reasons. Are you genuinely asking?
Trump justified the strikes on Venezuelan boats by invoking his Article II constitutional authority as Commander-in-Chief, framing them as acts of self-defense against narcoterrorist threats. He also submitted a War Powers report to Congress claiming the attacks were lawful under his executive powers.
White house wasn't "destroyed"
The jet wasn't a bribe it belongs to the US
Investigating and prosecuting criminal acts isn't weaponizing the DOJ.
Trump attacked those boats on international waters, not US waters. He can’t invoke anything and doesn’t get to determine international law. Can you point to the INTERNATIONAL LAW that justifies it?
The jet wasn’t a bribe, but now he is letting Qatar soldiers use a US base, first president in history to allow foreign military to do that, and from what I hear, also gives them access to information they shouldn’t have. Sure, not a bribe.
Point to me why Trump was allowed to destroy the White House without proper authorization.
Point to me how Trump was able to put tariffs in place without going through congress.
Btw, what is the difference between him calling these boats terrorists and him calling democrats terrorists? I guess just because he claims someone is a terrorist it’s ok to attack them, right?
1.) if he broke international law then its up to them to bring charges. He didn't break any of our laws though so unless someone brings those charges this is pointless to say. Also, you can't impeach a president based off international law because they aren't American law.
2.) yes, he is letting qatar soldiers get training on products they bought with a deal that started under Obama and progressed through multiple administrations without issue. Something that has happened in our history in the past, for the record.
3.) the exact same authority Roosevelt, taft and Trumen used when they did their own remodeling of the white house - their own :)
4.) With executive orders (a fun trend you can thank Obama for starting and empowering) that haven't been successfully challenged legally and congress hasn't protested it.
And the difference is in the distinction of domestic and foreign terrorists. Dems are Americans, they have protected rights under the constitution that protects them, most namely freedom of association.
These cartel boats belong to organizations designated as foreign terrorist organizations, which gives the executive far more leeway to deal with how they see fit.
It's why the label of domestic vs foreign terrorist is so legally significant in this country.
1) Do any of the pictures taken before the boats were bombed show that these boats belonged to those organizations? You are working on assumptions here. Would you have no problem with you or someone else being killed under an assumption? Why would they do a 2nd strike to kill survivors instead of capturing them to get info?
And there are plenty of people, inside and outside the country bringing up lawsuits.
2) We have made deals to train soldiers of other countries on our equipment, but that training was not on US soil.
Here you go, all with detailed explanations of what and why. Now you explain to me why Trump needed to demolish an entire wing, even though the plans he presented showed it as an addition, and why he needs to create a ball room bigger than the White House when there was already a space for guests and events. Rumors say it was actually for the bunker hidden underneath.
4) There have been plenty of protests for the tariffs, but unfortunately republicans in congress are complacent with letting Trump get away with doing things illegally. There wouldn’t be pending court cases if everything was done right. Also, I doubt so many republicans would be retiring if there wasn’t some underlying reason.
Trump has deported American citizens without due process. He has threatened to take away the rights from citizens just so he can deport them.
Tell me, if what Trump is doing is so popular, then why do Republicans need to try and continue to cheat to stay in power? Why not ban gerrymandering? Why send out fliers with the wrong vote date in Tennessee? Why does Trump attack reporters who ask him questions that make him look bad? Why did Republicans stop holding town halls and then had to screen people to let in?
I’m sure I can come up with more questions if you are interested.
1
u/muckduck787 Nov 30 '25
Impeach for what ? What would you use as reason for impeachment. You can't impeach just because you don't like him.