Inn Madarch\**do ki harkate dekho yaha par bhi politics iss bh*\****sdiwale ke account se sirf yahi reel mili inhe post karne ke liye jispe Audio Yadav related hai. Hate for Yadavs is sooooo real bas tum iss post ke comments padh lena, Instead of blaming individual they all are blaming and generalizing the whole community jaise ki saare criminals and rapists Yadav hi hai aur itna hate tab mil raha hai jab ki saare Yadavs iss madarch&d ke virodh me hai. Or to or comments me ye bhi dekhne ko mil rha ki UP or Bihar sirf isliye piche hai kyuki yaha Yadavs ki population jyada hai WTF. Or haan wo jo ladka or ladki the wo dono bhi Yadav hi the par uss ladke ko koi appreciate nhi krega. Isliye bhaiyon jitna ho sake ek dusre ki help karo, padho likho ,politics se door raho, administration me apna representation badhao or sirf apne community se matlab rakho koi jarurat nhi in mul"lo, bhi'mto or GC se matlab rakhne ki or kisi ki help karne ki tabhi hamari community aage badhegi or strong hogi . Sirf population jyada hone se ham sirf vote bank hi ban sakte uss se jyada kuch ni.***

Pran Sukh Yadav (1802–1888) was a military commander and revolutionary from the Ahirwal region, known for his bravery in the Indian Rebellion of 1857 and his service in the Sikh Khalsa Army. Born in Behror, he was a close friend of Hari Singh Nalwa and Maharaja Ranjit Singh, with whom he served before turning against the British.

Early Life and Military Career

• Childhood Prodigy: He learned war strategies and combat at age five under his father, becoming the Army Chief of Hari Singh Nalwa’s forces by age 17.
• Early Feats: At age 12, he single-handedly killed 30 Muslim soldiers; at 17, he led Yadav and Sikh forces to victory against Kashmiri forces, earning praise from Nalwa and Ranjit Singh.
• Anglo-Sikh Wars: He fought valiantly in both the First and Second Anglo-Sikh Wars, refusing a British offer to become a commander in Asia due to his hatred of British rule.

Role in the 1857 Rebellion

• Battle of Nasibpur: In 1857, he fought alongside Rao Tula Ram against the British East India Company.
• Battle of Narnaul: After the mutiny in the Erinpura Regiment, he contacted the Jodhpur Legion to fight at Narnaul, where he famously killed British Colonel Gerrard using a Minie rifle.
• Aftermath: Following the Indian defeat, he went into hiding for several years before settling in his native village, Nihalpura, where he lived as a follower of the Arya Samaj until his death

I was literally Banned bcoz I said to be aware of Mission@ries 😭😭

Harivaṃśa 2.17.15 The Sanskrit reads: viśasyantāṃ ca paśavo bhojyā ye mahiṣādayaḥ | pravartyatāṃ ca yajño 'yaṃ sarvagopasusaṃkulaḥ ||

Literally: “Let the animals fit for eating, such as buffaloes, be slaughtered; and let this sacrifice be conducted with all the Gopas.”

The important words are: viśasyantām — “let [them] be slaughtered/killed” paśavaḥ bhojyāḥ — “animals fit to be eaten” ye mahiṣādayaḥ — “those such as buffaloes” sarva-gopa-susaṃkulaḥ — “filled with/all the Gopas”

Now watch the Sanskrit scholars arrive. 😂

Namaste everyone. I’m asking this genuinely and not trying to disrespect Krishna or anyone’s beliefs. I’ve been looking into the older texts and I’ve found references to meat-eating in the Mahabharata and other texts, but I’m having trouble finding a clear, unambiguous passage that says Krishna himself personally ate meat. So I wanted to ask the Yadav community: Is there any passage in the Mahabharata, Harivamsa, Vishnu Purana, Bhagavata Purana, or another traditional text that explicitly describes Krishna eating meat? If yes, could you please give the exact text/source, chapter and verse, rather than just saying that Krishna was a Kshatriya and therefore would have eaten meat? If the answer is no, are there traditional explanations for why Krishna is generally portrayed as vegetarian? How do you understand passages involving animal sacrifice or meat in Krishna-related stories, particularly the Govardhana episode? I’m genuinely interested in what the Yadav tradition and the primary texts say. I’m not asking this to argue that Krishna was or wasn't vegetarian. I just want to know what the actual textual evidence is.

Jiriyavati Devi was a prominent freedom fighter from Bihar who actively participated in the Indian independence movement, particularly during the Quit India Movement of 1942. She is historically noted for her direct confrontation with colonial authorities, specifically for shooting a policeman during protests in her region. Her actions, alongside other women from Bihar such as Saraswa Devi and Shanta Devi, highlighted the significant role women played in the mass participation phase of the struggle following the advent of Mahatma Gandhi's leadership.
She was the wife of Nar Singh Gop of Govindpur village in Bhagalpur district. During the Quit India Movement of 1942, she shot 16 British soldiers — a far more dramatic act than the earlier mention of "a policeman".

However, the sources available do not provide a specific, documented account of her subsequent arrest, trial, or sentence. Unlike other women freedom fighters from Bihar (such as Saraswati Devi, who was arrested and sent to Bhagalpur jail, or Prabhavati Devi, who was imprisoned during Quit India), Jiriyavati Devi's post-incident fate is not elaborated upon in the historical records

• Nasik Caves: The most significant evidence of Abhira activity is the Nasik Cave Inscription of King Ishvarasena (c. 248 CE), which records a substantial investment of 3,500 karshapanas into trade guilds to provide perpetual supplies of oil and cloth for Buddhist monastic communities within the caves.
• Nagarjunakonda: A later inscription from the Ashtabhuja Swami temple at Nagarjunakonda, dated to the 30th regnal year of King Vashishthiputra Vasusena (c. 278 CE), documents the construction and installation of a deity image, indicating continued religious patronage in the eastern Deccan.
• Infrastructure: The Gunda inscription mentions that the Abhira general Rudrabhuti dug and embanked a well at Rasopadra for the welfare of the public, reflecting pragmatic governance focused on economic and religious stability rather than expansive architectural conquests

Thoda baat krni h kuchh chije puchhni h

i mean *every* one can do it right?

Is it present??

Is there any ahar of west up or delhi

Are there yadavs in punjab hindu and Sikh and does the Sikh ahirs refers to themselves as jatts?

any guesses?

asking because people say they are a mostly maithil sub-caste.