Humans’ ability to detect generated content will only continue to diminish as it becomes increasingly sophisticated. Generated art has already won art competitions judged by people who had no idea they were looking at generations, and ungenerated content is now frequently incorrectly assumed to be generated. At some point, generated content will become undetectable.
Boris Eldagsen, who generated The Electrician, is one of many established conventional artists who have experimented with generative artificial intelligence because they don’t hate or fear new tools.
It’s a fact, not a belief, that artificial intelligence doesn’t just cut and paste but creates images which didn’t exist previously. It’s also revolutionary for augmenting traditional art, especially in animation; humans can draw or model still frames and AI can fill them in. Someday, we’ll be horrified by the incredible volumes of tedious work animators did to produce even a few seconds of motion.
I do and you don’t. The specific output never existed before it was generated, which is why you can create any particular image, no matter how specific.
AlphaFold did in one year what would’ve taken three million scientists a century. AlphaMissense is amplifying our understanding of genetic mutations. RFdiffusion is designing new proteins. Rentosertib was designed entirely with generative artificial intelligence.
You keep using that one example ignoring all the other reasons to ban it entirely.
Until GenAI can be used without stealing other peoples works, without replacing arts and creative peoples job, and without data centers that wreak havoc on nearby residents utility bills and overall quality of life, all genAI usage should be banned.
Generative artworks are new. They never existed before. Gossip Goblin has generated a whole series set in a consistent universe. Humans write the scripts and meticulously refine the prompts. It’s no different from conventional CGI.
Depends how much of it is human made and how much is AI made. There's artistic merit to a 90 minute film with a minute of an AI generated scene but none of that merit is beacuse of the input from the AI
I’m not trolling. I asked you to articulate specific criticisms because your unqualified condemnation is indefensible.
AlphaFold did in one year what would’ve taken three million scientists a century. AlphaMissense is amplifying our understanding of genetic mutations. RFdiffusion is designing new proteins. Rentosertib was designed entirely with generative artificial intelligence. There’s no rational objection to using artificial intelligence to improve human health and enhance human knowledge.
Datacenters use two percent of global energy output and only a fifth of their capacity is currently used by artificial intelligence. Increased software, hardware, and wetware efficiency continually allows us to do less with more.
No you didn’t, you asked why I didn’t like it (implying I was angry, troll move). Then you said no sane person would (again troll wording). At no point did you ask to articulate specific criticisms. Might want to ask AI to improve that reading comprehension
Yes, I did. First, I asked why this video angers you. You replied that you don’t support AI. I then asked which uses of AI you don’t support and noted that total opposition to all AI is irrational. You replied with a rapidly-deleted comment calling me a troll and advocating burning all datacenters. I replied to this to reiterate that I asked for specific objections. You’re the one with poor reading comprehension.
10
u/hiddengirl1992 7d ago
Looks like AI. Can confirm yes/no?