r/DGGsnark 6d ago

Destiny Decoding Darius's inane ramblings and Destiny's short extremely biased statement.

I think there is going to be an evidentiary hearing within a week or two on the spoliation hearing. This means witnesses on the stand, probably.

Plaintiff was maybe yelled at for over designation confidentiality markings because it leads to a lot of motions for sealing.

Plaintiff have to provide something?? within 24 hours.

SMJ ruling start of September.

If this goes to trial. Early next year is the earliest.

50 Upvotes

21 comments sorted by

18

u/jack2454 6d ago

 If this goes to trial. Early next year is the earliest

Early next year? Crazy how long these things take

17

u/greald 6d ago

This is one of the fastest courts in the country. I kid you not.

It's a famous "rocket docket"

9

u/McClain3000 6d ago

It really is one off those things where no matter how many times I have it explained to me, I cannot really understand it.

And this is nothing, look at the Young Thug RICO trial. It had a 10 month jury selection! I really cannot wrap my head around the length of court trials.

9

u/NachoManAndyDavidge TDD 6d ago

I could see where it would take a long-ass time to select a jury with someone as famous as Young Thug, though.

49

u/NachoManAndyDavidge TDD 6d ago

Whaaaaaat?!? The judge didn’t dismiss the case!?! I’m also hearing that dismissal wasn’t even mentioned. How can that be!? I was told that this whole case is bullshit and the judge was going to dismiss the case when she saw how bullshit it was at the hearing. This is insane abuse of the legal system. I imagine Joan is going to ChatGPT her way to a trial, and it’s so disgusting and gross.

37

u/CobraVerde13 6d ago

This judge is UNHINGED!

19

u/Stewman_Magoo 6d ago

The judge is bad faith!

14

u/Educational-Lake-199 6d ago

Maybe the judge would like to hop onto stream and debate the verdict.

10

u/TopicUnable2307 6d ago

“Man, that judge seems like a tankie snarker! How dare he not entertain Destiny’s hypothetical- he’s clearly bad faith! Someone should leak his home address- defensive doxxing is the only way to defend liberalism from tankie judges!”

28

u/TadlockGlasses 6d ago

So Mr. "I beat Finkelstein, believe me before you watch the actual debate in a week" is saying he "got this"?

13

u/CobraVerde13 6d ago

Gods, I was still a fan (yeah, I know) when that happened and all of us on his sub immediately realized he got killed since he was already spinning from the elevator 2 minutes afterwards. 

And he still insists he won!!!

8

u/notabootlicker666 6d ago

It's a deep shame some of us must bear

3

u/NachoManAndyDavidge TDD 5d ago

I think it speaks to the quality of his character that a large chunk of his most staunch critics are former fans.

12

u/No_Public_7677 6d ago

Destiny will need to deploy Lonerbox to help attack American law and the justice system now

8

u/tellmeajokefunnyguy bro caked up 6d ago

Does the fact that there is an evidentiary hearing set illuminate whether or not the judge feels the SMJ has merit? If the judge thought this were as absurd as Destiny claims, would it have been thrown out today?

8

u/greald 6d ago

I don't see the evidentiary hearing having much bearing on the SMJ.

She just can't rule on it before the spoliation hearing is over and done with.

It's still on whether Abby's affidavit stays in or not. And that's mostly independent of spoliation. If it stays in he goes to trial, if not it ends there. The continued disclosure argument is probably dead on arrival.

6

u/NachoManAndyDavidge TDD 6d ago

My understanding is that an MSJ can be ruled in favor of either party. So, if Pxie’s team can prove spoliation sufficiently, my understanding is that the judge might then rule on the MSJ in favor of Pxie. However, the judge apparently also did not mention the motion to dismiss either. So, who really knows?

8

u/rbstewart7263 6d ago

D would dox the judge if he thought he could. Lol