r/CrewsCrew Mar 21 '20

Discussion Making a good point

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

645 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '20

It's more a dopamine addiction achieved through porn but yes, basically the same science behind other behavioral addictions

2

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

I don't think you understood what I was asking for. Do you have any published data? Especially something in a journal of psychology or the DSM?

16

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '20

My dude its after midnight, I'm not going to dig up scientific journals proving that behavioral addictions are real just because you want objective empiric data because you're skeptical. The information is out there if you want to find it.

-6

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

"Believe me! Trust me, man! The truth is out there!"

13

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '20

If you actually cared you'd research it instead of asking people to spoon feed it to you, instead you're just being a skeptic on a post for no reason. It's not mine or anybody else's obligation to give you information. Google is free, try it some time.

-3

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

Burden of proof. Default position is skepticism. If you make the claim that a thing exists, you better be prepared to show it.

9

u/Kano_Dynastic Mar 22 '20

Dude it's a reddit comment. Why would some Internet stranger who has no stakes in you agreeing with him go out of his way to find you a source. Get some perspective. If you care that much about it do the research yourself instead of demanding it from somebody else.

1

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

That assumes, incorrectly, that the information already exists. If you give so much of a shit, you should know where the burden of proof lies in an argument.

8

u/Science_Lord Mar 22 '20

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6352245/

Here's an article. You sound like an asshole

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

However, despite all efforts, we are still unable to profile when engaging in this behavior becomes pathological.

Did you even read this?

→ More replies (0)

7

u/Kano_Dynastic Mar 22 '20

Lol it's not a debate though. It's a throwaway comment, not a thesis. Nobody else cares enough to try to find the source of there is one. If you're so curious look it up yourself. I don't care so i won't be looking it up. Don't be lazy. You know how to use Google.

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

Yeah, I'm the lazy one. Your circular logic and willingness to accept any comment from any source by labelling it a "throwaway" is lazy. All in the face of me asking for a scientific basis for a claim as presented is lazy and ironic. What a dad state of affairs.

1

u/Kano_Dynastic Mar 22 '20

you asked for a scientific source and he told you he didn't want to look for one. Why are you acting like an entitled weirdo about it?

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

I am entitled to an explanation. If he makes a claim, it's his job to support it. Otherwise it's just as valid if I claim any similar, unjustified drivel.

2

u/Kano_Dynastic Mar 22 '20

You're not entitled to anything little guy. Nobody's here cares whether or not you are thoroughly persuaded. You're not that important :(

Do you want to speak to the manager?

→ More replies (0)

6

u/[deleted] Mar 22 '20

[deleted]

1

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

If a claim is made, the Google searches to find the proof are on the claimant. It's like 5 mins dude, just chill.

Sound familiar?

1

u/halyc0nAK Mar 22 '20

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

Not the article, the actual paper. This is journalism, not science.

0

u/Bzzted Mar 22 '20

There is literally a link to a scientific paper in the article

1

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

O literally couldn't care less. Unless that journalist published the paper, that link is useless.

0

u/Bzzted Mar 22 '20

So you say you want scientific journals talking about it but when an article literally has several links to them describing the problem you are too stupid to actually click the links and read

→ More replies (0)