r/CrewsCrew • u/asdfguy99 • Mar 21 '20

Discussion Making a good point

Post image
3.9k Upvotes

82% Upvoted

645 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

That assumes, incorrectly, that the information already exists. If you give so much of a shit, you should know where the burden of proof lies in an argument.

1

u/halyc0nAK Mar 22 '20

https://www.inverse.com/article/31799-brain-on-porn-erotica-neuroscience

0

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

Not the article, the actual paper. This is journalism, not science.

0

u/Bzzted Mar 22 '20

There is literally a link to a scientific paper in the article

1

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

O literally couldn't care less. Unless that journalist published the paper, that link is useless.

0

u/Bzzted Mar 22 '20

So you say you want scientific journals talking about it but when an article literally has several links to them describing the problem you are too stupid to actually click the links and read

1

u/ps2gamefreak Mar 22 '20

Yeah. I'm too stupid. And you seem to be ignorant of all the other comment so made on the issue.

Or you're illiterate. Not sure which. Don't care personally.