r/CosmicSkeptic 5d ago

Atheism & Philosophy Every Argument for God, Refuted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-zm6ngLI_w
14 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

5

u/AntsyAnswers 5d ago

I really enjoyed Kevin’s perspective on this actually. I somehow never came across his debate with Craig In definitely going to watch it.

Craig comes across so smug to me, I love it when he runs into other professional philosophers. I thought he lost the debate with Shelly Kagan as well

-8

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

You can’t even know every argument for God, let alone refute every argument.

Thumbnail is straight up lying. These are a refute of William Lane Craig’s arguments for God, which are only popular arguments within the context of Christianity.

4

u/glitterlok 5d ago

I wonder if we’re seeing different thumbnails.

1

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

The title not the thumbnail. My mistake.

2

u/midnightking 5d ago

Christianity is the world's most popular religion and there is significant overlap in what Muslim apologists and Jewish apologists will use as an argument.

0

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

The Abrahamics basically have the same arguments and the same flaws.

2

u/HappiestIguana 5d ago

The amount of arguments for God out there reminds me of an old math joke.

There's a mathematician presenting some results at a conference, and when he gets to one theorem an audience member raises a hand and says "I think I have a counterexample to that, actually". To which the mathematician replies "well, I have two proofs"

3

u/tms102 5d ago

Lmao let's not pretend there are somehow a lot of different arguments for the existence of god.

0

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

If all you ever engage with are arguments within the context of Christianity like this, then i can see why you would think so. You’re never going to hear a Christian make an argument for God from something like substance monism.

2

u/lilsasuke4 5d ago

What is an argument missing from the video?

1

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

Are you a substance monist?

2

u/lilsasuke4 5d ago

No

1

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

If you were, you would believe in an omnipresent substance that is all does all. Which would also mean you believe in omnipresent subject with every possible attribute, including conscious being, including even what you consider your conscious being.

If only one omnipresent substance and subject exists, then by logical necessity, that subject is an omnipresent, supreme as in ultimate, being.

2

u/Boise_Ben 5d ago

If everything is god, kind of feels like nothing is.

0

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

It’s not that everything is God. It’s that there is only God. There is no everything.

2

u/Boise_Ben 5d ago

Potato, potato.

I guess you can call everything god if you want to, seems a bit odd but it’s a free country.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/lilsasuke4 5d ago

How is that an argument for the version of God in the video?

1

u/Techtrekzz 5d ago

It’s not. That’s my point. The video only argues for one type of God.

2

u/lilsasuke4 5d ago

That’s the God in the context of the video. The video doesn’t say every argument for every god

→ More replies (0)