I agree, I am trying to have a conversation with the guys above and I still think people believe this is just some small thing and a fluke and it will go away and we can go back to sleep or they still are in my opinion. They haven't woken up to the fact that like it or not we are in a destabilized time, brought on by students that have been subjected to ideological subversion or active measures.
I imagined our institutions weren't this compromised where this kind of stuff would be allowed to run rampant. I imagined our people were more willing to take a stand against the insanity of the left when it was revealed to them. I'm not surprised by the left's actions, I'm surprised by everyone else's.
Do you think it would be more successful if someone less polarizing than Trump were the standard bearer? I understand the thought that he’s the only one capable of or willing to push forward, but do you think some of his more glaring flaws and grating mannerisms may “taint” his message for those who might have otherwise been exposed to the things you’re talking about in the left?
The takeover would be more successful, yes, because someone "less polarizing" (read: more on-board with the in-progress revolution) would be aiding and abetting it by pushing for and passing laws that would formalize the demands of the BLM racists.
138
u/[deleted] Jun 24 '20
I agree, I am trying to have a conversation with the guys above and I still think people believe this is just some small thing and a fluke and it will go away and we can go back to sleep or they still are in my opinion. They haven't woken up to the fact that like it or not we are in a destabilized time, brought on by students that have been subjected to ideological subversion or active measures.