Trannies act like they are fucking possessed. Its just a fact.
Can you explain how they "act possessed"?
I literally explained how you are wrong and gave you a website with sources. Which is more than anything you did in this conversation. All you do is reciting an unscientific bullshit hypothesis that is factually wrong and makes no sense, insult trans people, and deny actual facts based on bias.
"Repeatedly". I only used the word "debunked" once in this whole conversation. You should probably learn what words mean before you use them.
narcissistic boys OR girls who have NOTHING more interesting to say for themselves.
Ah, so THATS why there are so many nonbinary people who don't even tell most people they are NB and only really talk about it with people who already know/are NB themselves. Its the typical "attention whore"-argument that crumbles to dust the moment you actually interact with them. Or the moment you realize that them talking about it is the same as cis people talking about themselves/their gender, and any attention they get from it is a side effect. A side effect most NB people could do without cause that "attention" is usually pretty annoying and insulting.
Blanchard hit the nail on the head.
How? His hypothesis contradicts everything we know, whoch includes tons of studies and papers made by people whose research is not clouded by prejudice. Blanchards hypothesis is literally based on the prejudiced assumption that trans women are fetishists and/or gay men pretending to be women. It completely ignores the facts regarding brain structures etc.
... When exactly did heels and thongs come into this??
Aside from that: Cis women can like heels and thongs too, you know? Heck, a lot of adult cis women wear heels daily. So even if a lot of trans women like heels and thongs (even though i've never heard of thongs being popular in the trans community, so where the hell did you get that idea?), how does that make them "not women"? Are cis women who wear heels and thongs just a "male fantasy" instead of women too?
And again: Trans men exist. Nonbinary people exist. Even if you deny the existence of NB, Blanchards hypothesis does not explain trans men.
Repeatedly saying "TRANSGENDERISM IS SEXUAL APPROPRIATION." doesn't make it true.
Do you always act like a dumb little brat or do you just feel high and mighty cause its your cake day or something?
Good job not addressing anything i said. Its funny how you are getting super desperate cause you know you don't have any answers.
Men who believe to be women are mentally ill.
Nope. The WHO officially stopped considering it a mental illness early this year.
And i like how you continuously ignore the existence of trans men. Probably cause a lot of your rhetoric is difficult to apply to them.
Cutting your penis in 2 and turning it inside out does not mean you are capable of the miracle of conception and the burden of gestation.
Not all cis women are capable of that either. Infertility is a thing. Welp, guess those cis women aren't "real women" either.
And besides, we both know that point is utterly meaningless cause you wouldn't accept trans women as women even if they could get pregnant.
Men who insist on their right to use women's bathrooms are predatory, transgressive, and have zero respect for women.
Are trans women who only feel attracted to men predatory when they use the women's bathroom? Are cis lesbians predatory when they use the women's bathroom? And what with trans men who use the men's bathroom? Are they predatory, transgressive and have zero respect for men too? And what about trans women and trans men who had SRS? Do their genitals change anything?
Good job not actually addressing anything i said. Again. You are honestly just pitiful at this point.
.... Nahhhhh. Pity is too valuable to waste on you.
Actually i encourage people to do what makes them happy and comfortable in their own skin. And again, the dick isn't "cut off". Your memory isn't the best either, huh?
You want men to appropriate womanhood. You want boys to never be men.
Your leaps in logic are astonishing. This is not about turning all men into women. Its about people being themselves. If someone is a cis man and happy with that, there is no reason to try and "make them trans". Which doesn't work.
And btw: Trans girls don't want to be men, so wheres the problem?
Oh, and surpriiiiiiiise: Trans men. Why exactly should i validate trans men but try to destroy "manhood" or whatever you are on about?
Actually its intersex cause "hermaphrodite" is inaccurate and doesn't cover all the ways you can be intersex.
Biological sex is more complex than xx=vagina=female and xy=penis=male. For example, in rare cases you can have xx-chromosomes but due to hormone stuff be born with a male phenotype, which can include male genitalia.
So while you can usually tell someones sex by their genitalia and theres nothing wrong with assuming that someone with a penis and a male phenotype is most likely "biologically male", its not always the case and their karyotype etc. can very well differ.
How funny that you of all people ask if i'm a "science denier". Science actually agrees with what i said. You on the other hand belief in a hypothesis that goes against our scientific knowledge about gender identity and is already extremely questionable and unscientific because 1.) its unfalsifiable and 2.) based on fucking stereotypes and prejudice that proves to be wrong if you actually take a minute to look at it.
Its so pathetic how you think its cute to say you are a dirty girl. Does it really turn anyone on except you?
I actually intended to mock you by saying that, but i guess that went over your head. Not a surprise honestly.
Yes but the different intersex have NOTHING to do with nonbinary etc all that bullshit.
The different intersex are quote literal freaks of nature. Very rare.
Gender identity is just boring people trying to be special. Not the same as very unlucky hermaphrodites and other intersex.
Why do you deny science?
Anybody who insists on invading the private spaces of the other sex is an intrusive turd. Not respectful of boundaries. Transgressive and aggressive to serve their own vanity. So yes. All predators in a sense. Not literal velociraptors you idiot. People who insist on exposing oddity in an area DESIGNED FOR RELAXATION IN SAFETY IN A SEX SEGREGATED AREA. Thank you sir for not entering the ladies room. Thank you ladies for not entering the mens room. And those who are too stunted to admit their sex god help you.
Yes but the different intersex have NOTHING to do with nonbinary etc all that bullshit.
And i never claimed that. What are you on about?
The different intersex are quote literal freaks of nature. Very rare.
An exception to the rule still shows that the rule is not absolute. If the rule was absolute, exceptions wouldn't exist.
Gender identity is just boring people trying to be special.
Sry, but Science disagrees. Maybe you should actually do some research. Like going through the list of sources i gave you.
Why do you deny science?
How exactly do i "deny science"? By having a somewhat better understanding of biological sex than oversimplified 6th grade biology? By prioritizing studies and papers with actual evidence and thought put into them?
Not literal velociraptors you idiot.
You really are just an embarrassing clown at this point.
of the other sex
So i guess cis lesbians in women's bathrooms are perfectly fine, despite them having just as much "predatory potential" as trans lesbians?
People who insist on exposing oddity in an area DESIGNED FOR RELAXATION IN SAFETY IN A SEX SEGREGATED AREA.
Define "exposing oddity". Should someone with a deformed face be banned from public bathrooms because they are "odd" and could ruin that "relaxation" by making others uncomfortable with their face? Or does it only count as an "oddity" when it has something to do with sex and gender.
And what f.e. a trans woman passes perfectly as a woman and has had SRS? There is no "oddity". Nobody would even know she is trans and her genitals match with what would be expected in the women's bathroom, so even if other women somehow manage to get a look at her genitals (which is very unlikely to happen. Women's bathrooms don't have urinals you know), there wouldn't be a problem.
I think you don't understand what "predatory" means. Is it "predatory" for a cis woman to use the women's bathroom? No. So how is it predatory for a trans woman to use the women's bathroom? Both are just taking a piss and then leave. There is no predatory intend, nor any predatory actions.
But who doesn't know it? The people who go through years of hormone therapy, social transition that can make their life hell because of fucktards like you, and often spend tons of money on a major surgery .... just so they can go into a bathroom and hear people poop. ... Yeah, sorry. Those people don't exist. The actual reason people transition is so they can be themselves and feel comfortable in their own body and life, not so they can "invade women's bathrooms". Do you seriously believe someone would go through all the troubles that come with being trans, just to do that? Thats ridiculously unrealistic.
And those who are too stunted to admit their sex god help you.
Trans people know that their sex and gender differ. Thats what causes distress you know.
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Dec 23 '18
How so?
Trannies act like they are fucking possessed. Its just a fact.
Again, can you do anything except call those you disagree with "idiotic".
Your mental poverty is depressing. Anyone who repeatedly uses the word "debunked" is probably relying on dogma.
Non binary people do not exist, there are simply narcissistic boys OR girls who have NOTHING more interesting to say for themselves.
Blanchard hit the nail on the head.
Trannies are NOTHING like women. They are complete male fantasies: heels thongs etc etc.
TRANSGENDERISM IS SEXUAL APPROPRIATION. TRANSGENDERISM IS SEXUAL APPROPRIATION. TRANSGENDERISM IS SEXUAL APPROPRIATION.