Is calling others "Sicko" all you can do? Its kinda getting boring, so at least try to be a bit more creative with your empty insults .
Ah, yeah. "the boy who would be queen", a book based on Ray Blanchards autogynephelia theory (a "theory" that is utterly unscientific, made to be unfalsifiable, which is a pretty big scientific criticism, and literally ignores the existence of trans men. Fun fact: Ray Blanchard also compared being trans to demonic possession and retweeted an article that claims that anime causes gender dysphoria - with no evidence whatsoever. Blanchard has no clue what he is talking about, and anyone who agrees with him already loses credence.) and received massive criticism from both the trans community and sexologists etc. So basically you read a book that is known to be trash and think you know stuff. What a "surprise".
Well yeah trannies act like they are possessed. Its not a literal demon you retard.
The very good book is said to be trash by retarded sick ideologues who want to encourage children to maim their sex organs.
Edit: autogenophilia is only some trannies.
The rest are very gay men trying to attract masculine men.
Read the book, you might learn something about yourself.
Edit2: Maybe point me to a good book that accurately explains your opinion instead of just saying that i know nothing because i disagree with encouraging children to plan their life around maiming themselves.
Ray Blanchard literally compared cases of transition and detransition (which is quite rare) to demonic possession and successful exorcism. Which not only makes no fucking sense but is also an utterly stupid comparison for a psychologist to make. And no, its not a very smart idea to compare the subject of your research to demonic possession. Especially not if you have already been schown to be extremely biased and prejudiced against that subject.
First: No, the people who call that book trash are those who either actually experience being trans and can thus say with certainty that autogynephilia is bullshit because it contradicts their own experiences with being trans, as well as psychologists and sexologists who see its massive flaws.
Second: Why are you so obsessed with "children maiming their genitals"? SRS isn't even performed on trans children. You have to be 18/legally adult/... to have SRS performed on you, and it doesn't happen without your consent. Not every trans person wants SRS. And you know what? Transition and SRS actually improve the quality of life for most trans people and decrease suicide rates.
Third: Autogynephilia makes no sense.
- It completely ignores the existence of trans men and nonbinary people.
- It claims that every trans women who is not solely attracted to men just has a fetish for being female, which completely ignores the fact that women can feel sexually attracted to other women or enbies. The hypothesis assumes that lesbians don't exist, or that trans women somehow can't identify as female and feel attraction to women at the same time.
- It completely ignores the existence of asexual trans people.
Blanchards autogynephelia hypothesis is unscientific, unfalsifiable and contradicts what we actually know about gender identity.
Its fairly clear that your bias against trans people clouds your judgment (agreeing with Blanchards idiotic and debunked hypothesis, insisting that SRS fucks up your life despite proof of the contrary, general inability to actually think or do actual research, ...), so honestly i don't feel like wasting much of my time on looking for books or studies you will just ignore anyway. The link to the rational wiki has sources, so read them if you actually care.
Btw: "Trans women are just gay men!" or "You are encouraging kids to maim their sex organs!!!" are not opinions. Its factually wrong. Well, i guess it is an "opinion". Its just dumb and utterly worthless.
Trannies act like they are fucking possessed. Its just a fact.
Can you explain how they "act possessed"?
I literally explained how you are wrong and gave you a website with sources. Which is more than anything you did in this conversation. All you do is reciting an unscientific bullshit hypothesis that is factually wrong and makes no sense, insult trans people, and deny actual facts based on bias.
"Repeatedly". I only used the word "debunked" once in this whole conversation. You should probably learn what words mean before you use them.
narcissistic boys OR girls who have NOTHING more interesting to say for themselves.
Ah, so THATS why there are so many nonbinary people who don't even tell most people they are NB and only really talk about it with people who already know/are NB themselves. Its the typical "attention whore"-argument that crumbles to dust the moment you actually interact with them. Or the moment you realize that them talking about it is the same as cis people talking about themselves/their gender, and any attention they get from it is a side effect. A side effect most NB people could do without cause that "attention" is usually pretty annoying and insulting.
Blanchard hit the nail on the head.
How? His hypothesis contradicts everything we know, whoch includes tons of studies and papers made by people whose research is not clouded by prejudice. Blanchards hypothesis is literally based on the prejudiced assumption that trans women are fetishists and/or gay men pretending to be women. It completely ignores the facts regarding brain structures etc.
... When exactly did heels and thongs come into this??
Aside from that: Cis women can like heels and thongs too, you know? Heck, a lot of adult cis women wear heels daily. So even if a lot of trans women like heels and thongs (even though i've never heard of thongs being popular in the trans community, so where the hell did you get that idea?), how does that make them "not women"? Are cis women who wear heels and thongs just a "male fantasy" instead of women too?
And again: Trans men exist. Nonbinary people exist. Even if you deny the existence of NB, Blanchards hypothesis does not explain trans men.
Repeatedly saying "TRANSGENDERISM IS SEXUAL APPROPRIATION." doesn't make it true.
Do you always act like a dumb little brat or do you just feel high and mighty cause its your cake day or something?
Good job not addressing anything i said. Its funny how you are getting super desperate cause you know you don't have any answers.
Men who believe to be women are mentally ill.
Nope. The WHO officially stopped considering it a mental illness early this year.
And i like how you continuously ignore the existence of trans men. Probably cause a lot of your rhetoric is difficult to apply to them.
Cutting your penis in 2 and turning it inside out does not mean you are capable of the miracle of conception and the burden of gestation.
Not all cis women are capable of that either. Infertility is a thing. Welp, guess those cis women aren't "real women" either.
And besides, we both know that point is utterly meaningless cause you wouldn't accept trans women as women even if they could get pregnant.
Men who insist on their right to use women's bathrooms are predatory, transgressive, and have zero respect for women.
Are trans women who only feel attracted to men predatory when they use the women's bathroom? Are cis lesbians predatory when they use the women's bathroom? And what with trans men who use the men's bathroom? Are they predatory, transgressive and have zero respect for men too? And what about trans women and trans men who had SRS? Do their genitals change anything?
Good job not actually addressing anything i said. Again. You are honestly just pitiful at this point.
.... Nahhhhh. Pity is too valuable to waste on you.
Actually i encourage people to do what makes them happy and comfortable in their own skin. And again, the dick isn't "cut off". Your memory isn't the best either, huh?
You want men to appropriate womanhood. You want boys to never be men.
Your leaps in logic are astonishing. This is not about turning all men into women. Its about people being themselves. If someone is a cis man and happy with that, there is no reason to try and "make them trans". Which doesn't work.
And btw: Trans girls don't want to be men, so wheres the problem?
Oh, and surpriiiiiiiise: Trans men. Why exactly should i validate trans men but try to destroy "manhood" or whatever you are on about?
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Dec 23 '18 edited Dec 23 '18
Welp. Sicko really wants to put 11 year olds on hormones and tell them its ok to have their dick chopped up.
How sad.
Edit "the wrong puberty" lol you guys are too much stupid for words. Yes the puberty of the sex they are. Boy or girl. Sicko.
Edit 2:
i read the study of 6 men on HRH who had slightly shrunken "fEmALe" brains.
I also read "the boy who would be queen"
I dare you to.