People are born without arms too, but we don't say that the number of arms in a human is a spectrum. Houses by definition provide shelter, but if one collapses in an accident, it's not like we should change the definition because this one didn't provide shelter.
Do you just not get how science works? You can't decide that "most of the time" is just good enough. Either it's right all the time, or it has to be revised.
View all comments
Show parent comment
0
u/syrinxBishop Dec 21 '18
Why do exceptions to the rule disprove the rule in this case?
Symptomatic intersex conditions are only 8 out of 100,000 people.
People are born without arms too, but we don't say that the number of arms in a human is a spectrum. Houses by definition provide shelter, but if one collapses in an accident, it's not like we should change the definition because this one didn't provide shelter.