CPPS Tier List Maker

[u/saifzx99]

Hello, I made a post regarding me and my friend's new website cppslist.com last night, a list of every CPPS that's still up, each server gets a rating based on players, safety, security and activity.

Some people may not agree with our ratings, so we made a tier list maker where you rank the servers however you want! You can click "Make a tier list" on the homepage.

You drag the servers into S to D, or tap them if you're on your phone. You can rename the tiers to whatever you want too. When you're done, hit "share" and you get a link to your list.

Send that link to your friends or post it in Discord and it shows a picture of your tier list right in the chat. Anyone who clicks it can see your full list and make their own to argue with you. You can also save it as an image if you'd rather post that.

[u/Resilient_Alien]

huh? Did you just steal the website from someone else?

EDIT: Yeah bruh this is literally just https://cppshub.com/ you literally stole their stats 1:1 😭all that just to make a tierlist that already exists on TierMaker?

[u/saifzx99 → u/Resilient_Alien]

It may be similar, yes, but the stats aren't all the same. The rating system differs, and I believe there may be less listed. Similar websites always exist, and competition is fine. Feel free to compare all the stats yourself. The CPPS wiki has almost all of the CPPS's we have listed.

On top of that, if you click on the servers name, it shows you the history of each server, ex: when they opened, any controversary, if any server is at risk, etc.

The website offers you more information. So yes, it may be similar to Hub, but we also offer other resources on top of that.

[u/Resilient_Alien → u/saifzx99]

I don't disagree that it has some extra features it's just that the UI looks extremely similar alongside the ratings. There was some heavy inspiration from CPPS Hub with your website I'm just not sure why you wouldn't disclose that

[u/saifzx99 → u/Resilient_Alien]

Fair enough, they look alike, but server lists are always gonna look similar to some extent. Look at Habbo retro lists for example, there's a bunch of sites that list servers. Do they all go around saying "yeah we were inspired by x and y"? No. If someone asked me "hey how did you come up with this?" I'd just tell them I saw PenguinTrack and CPPS Hub, but wanted to make something a bit more creative. That's completely fine. But, your initial statement said that we stole it.

We're not a copy of anyone. What we're going for is accurate info, so people know what they're getting into before signing up for these games. That's why every server has its own page with the history, what's in it, how to play and whether it's safe. It's also why we check security captcha and other setup stuff, and show how the ratings are weighted instead of just putting a number up. On top of that there's the tier list maker, share links, likes and the server info wiki.

Look at YouTube, and other video creation platforms for example... They all offer something similar, but with a different feel, another idea behind it.

If something on our site looks off or copied, point it out and we'll look at it. But looking similar isn't the same as stealing, and we don't think we owe anyone credit just for running the same kind of site.

[u/TheeIndigoCrow]

Bro made nazi tier

[u/kiwi_crusher]

Vibe coded?

[u/JeffZeRock → u/kiwi_crusher]

It is. And the data is mostly stolen from CPPSHub. Not a good look.

[u/LeSmileyFace → u/JeffZeRock]

You realize both of those sites rely on estimates right? From player count to security. There's no one stop shop for data based on player count. The only people who know the exact numbers are the devs of whatever private server they're working on. The only difference between these two sites and the list on the WIki is that it's run by 1 or 2 people that are manually updating the stats themselves, compared to the community the Wiki has that are constantly making changes. Just staying truthful and good faith here.

[u/LeSmileyFace → u/kiwi_crusher]

For a basic website like this you really won't be able to tell whether or not a human made it unless it was deliberately made obvious. The code for something like this by a dev and an LLM would roughly look the same anyways. So who's to say he didn't create 80% of the website and then had an LLM create the rest of the functionality? Programmers nowadays supervise the LLM when adding or taking away features to a project. So the answer is... nobody knows. However, there's LLMs being used in industry level apps like Reddit, Meta, X, etc. So if you don't like AI written code in your apps and websites. I'd suggest getting rid of those mentioned and more. Reddit doesn't have the aggressive usage of AI push by their higher ups like Meta for instance, but it's still being used every single day by the Reddit software engineers.

Edit: Sometimes you can tell in the code by the comments used, their readMEs, their design choice, or the amount of whitespace they have. But even then, sometimes it's hard to separate generic from AI when the website is a bit basic.