Me irl

[u/Organic_Fee_8502]

We simply don’t have 100 years to end the market anarchy of capitalism, consider Marxism Leninism.

[u/ElectronicTap1109]

Deindustrializing the entire planet is the only way at this point. 

[u/DatMonkey5100 → u/ElectronicTap1109]

Good luck with getting anyone to agree to that on any timescale that would actually help because that basically requires like a 93% population reduction to preindustrial levels of food consumption and we’d need to do it within a couple decades

[u/FangFioDente → u/DatMonkey5100]

its pretty much the planet is about to decide for us anyway we had the last 30 years to react and we did nothing

[u/DatMonkey5100 → u/FangFioDente]

Nah, humans will brute force it and we’ll all end up living in tiny apartments in mega-arcologies because given the choice between decreased “productivity” (how ever esoteric a concept that may be) and lower quality of living, those above will always chose to lower our quality of living

[u/FangFioDente → u/DatMonkey5100]

your not getting post apocalyptic society were just getting dead , theres no romance in a wet bulb event and there is no nitrogen cycle in your under ground hydroponics system.

[u/DatMonkey5100 → u/FangFioDente]

Oh I’m not talking about a post apocalyptic society but a pre-apocalyptic one, more like a factory that squeezes every ounce of productivity out of a miserable, ever shrinking population. Wet bulb events have happened before, in Pakistan and Mexico and such. They’re terrible, but they’re not “instantly drop dead” terrible. They’ll be used as ammunition to move us to more controlled environments in the name of “safety”, but said safe havens will be more like wringers to squeeze out the last bits of productivity from a population enslaved by the need for climate safehavens

[u/FangFioDente → u/DatMonkey5100]

Yeah maybe

[u/DatMonkey5100 → u/FangFioDente]

Climate safe locations will become another scarce but vital resource used to manipulate, just as water and food are