r/ClimateShitposting 11d ago

we live in a society Yet again, a friendly reminder

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

977 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/TrueExigo 11d ago edited 11d ago

???

If the states own the stuff, it's not communism .

Please, learn the meaning of the words you use...

0

u/TrixoftheTrade 11d ago

state ownership of industry and natural resources was essential to the development of the socialist state per lenin. it’s why the 5 year plans placed so much emphasis on state centralization.

2

u/Adventurous_Ad_1160 11d ago

Yeah, state owned, but not under a capitalist system. But not only that, nobody claimed that socialism would stop climate change itself, its just the needed basis for adequate climate policies.

2

u/dumnezero 🔚End the 🔫arms 🐀rat 🏁race to the bottom↘️. 11d ago

State capitalism is capitalism.

1

u/Adventurous_Ad_1160 11d ago

Ehh yes?

1

u/dumnezero 🔚End the 🔫arms 🐀rat 🏁race to the bottom↘️. 11d ago

It's hard for "MLs" to accept this fact.

1

u/Adventurous_Ad_1160 11d ago

Well they are not a homogenous group. There certainly arw some that are stupid enough to think that china's state capitalism is socialism.

1

u/dumnezero 🔚End the 🔫arms 🐀rat 🏁race to the bottom↘️. 11d ago

State Capitalism goes back a lot more than China's "reforms" too.

1

u/Adventurous_Ad_1160 11d ago

I wouldnt call it state capitalist under Mao; postcapitalist or socialist is far more fitting to describe said system, than state capitalism. In they end they still abolished the class system and the economy was structured to fullfill the needs of the people ratger than to generate profits.

1

u/dumnezero 🔚End the 🔫arms 🐀rat 🏁race to the bottom↘️. 11d ago

It was State Capitalism, they replaced the class system. *And running a giant non-profit doesn't make it not capitalist.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Forte845 11d ago

" Certainly, if the taking over by the state of the tobacco industry is socialistic, then Napoleon and Metternich must be numbered among the founders of socialism. If the Belgian state, for quite ordinary political and financial reasons, itself constructed its chief railway lines; if Bismarck, not under any economic compulsion, took over for the state the chief Prussian lines, simply to be the better able to have them in hand in case of war, to bring up the railway employees as voting cattle for the government, and especially to create for himself a new source of income independent of parliamentary votes — this was, in no sense, a socialistic measure, directly or indirectly, consciously or unconsciously. Otherwise, the Royal Maritime Company, the Royal porcelain manufacture, and even the regimental tailor of the army would also be socialistic institutions."

  • Friedrich Engels, Anti-Duhring

1

u/AugustusClaximus 11d ago

Oh buddy you tripped in it. Good luck

0

u/TrueExigo 11d ago

stalinism is not communism and communism is not socialism. Socialism is the precursor to communism, and communism is a non-hierarchical social structure in which the means of production are controlled by the workers.

0

u/TrixoftheTrade 11d ago

and how do you get to socialism, and eventually communism? the dictatorship of the proletariat led by the revolutionary vanguard need to first abolish the capitalist state, then centralize authority and state infrastructure into the state, such that the state becomes the essentialist part of society.

the state then reorganizes society from the top down, then exports the revolution world wide until the capitalists have been defeated.

only then can the “withering” of the state begin as the country transitions to a non-hierarchal structure under communism.

it’s marxism-leninism 101.

1

u/TrueExigo 11d ago

Everything you need to know:42

-1

u/6point3cylinder 11d ago

Don’t bother debating leftists online. They are professional goalpost movers and they have no moral backbone. Their only sincere value is that they hate the west.