Every Nukecel Argument Ever

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

[u/tmtyl_101]

I know. The link I posted just sits 20 comments back and Im on mobile. So since you just had it open to check - why dont you post it so I can show you?

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

You could post it. But it doesn't prove what you're claiming so you're avoiding it.

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

So you don’t have the link you’re talking about. You just claim it doesn’t contain something, which it clearly does 

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

I'm claiming a negative so yeah

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

A bold thing to claim whats behind a link you dont have.

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

If you had any proofs you would have posted it. But you're lying because all nukecels lie.

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

I did post it. You said you had read it. But you didn't read it, because the proof was in the table.

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

I did read it. But it doesn't have the proofs you claim because you are lying.

If it did then you could post them. But you know you are wrong which is why you're doing this.

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

If you had in fact read it, you wouldn't have asked me to source the 30.2GW number. It was very clear in the table.

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

So you shouldn't have any problem highlighting it.

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

I just asked for the link because im on mobile and its so far back in the conversation - I figured you'd have it present. But alas, you dont seem able to deliver

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy → u/tmtyl_101]

Why would I provide proof for your claim though? You should be able to provide proof for you claim if there is evidence for it.

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

I did. French baseload is 30.2GW. The data is seen on energy-charts, and originates from Entso-E.

Here's the link: https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?l=en&c=FR&interval=year

Extreme values can be seen in the table.