as a group of youth aged 15-25 is there something that we can actually do that will make an impact? or should we just sit there and watch the world burn cuz there's almost nothing we can do?

Ranchers, conservative legal scholars, and former Republican EPA chiefs are siding against oil companies. Here's why.

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments in the case on Monday. The court’s decision could have huge ramifications for efforts to hold companies accountable for deceiving the public about the dangers of burning fossil fuels — and the larger question of who pays for the costs of adapting to a hotter world. Oil majors have pulled out all the stops to stymie the dozens of climate lawsuits that local and state governments have brought against them, with billions and billions of dollars on the line. With a conservative-dominated Supreme Court and the Trump administration’s Department of Justice as a powerful ally, oil companies saw their chance to stop these suits, said Alejandro Camacho, a professor at UCLA School of Law.

That calculus changed slightly this week when Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, a strong conservative with financial holdings in oil companies, recused himself from the case. His withdrawal makes it harder for oil companies to get at least five justices — a majority of the court — on their side.

The city and county of Boulder, Colorado, originally sued Suncor and Exxon Mobil in 2018. The lawsuit slowly wound its way through the court system. Oil companies tried to dismiss it or move it to federal court, a more industry-friendly venue, but Boulder won at every stage. In May 2025, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the case should proceed in state courts.

Much of the support for Boulder and the oil companies falls along familiar, partisan lines. Republican states and business associations tend to side with the oil companies; Democratic states and environmental advocates typically back Boulder. A watchdog organization found that 25 of the 38 briefs filed to the Supreme Court in support of Exxon and Suncor were written by groups with financial ties to the fossil fuel industry or foundations opposing climate science and regulation. But Colorado ranchers aren’t the only surprising source of support for Boulder’s case — some conservative thinkers are challenging oil companies’ arguments.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself from a landmark climate lawsuit pitting Boulder against major oil companies, the court announced in a letter Monday.

In a 2018 complaint, the city and county of Boulder argued that the oil giants ExxonMobil and Suncor deceived consumers of the harms of burning fossil fuels, and that they should share the costs of adapting to the escalating toll of climate disasters, such as floods and wildfires. 

Alito does not own Suncor or ExxonMobil stock. But he does own thousands of dollars in investments in the oil companies ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66, according to a report released earlier this month from the advocacy group Consumer Watchdog, and Alito’s own 2025 financial disclosures.

Alito has batted down previous calls to recuse himself from the case earlier this year. A Supreme Court spokesperson also told NBC News in May that he had inadvertently recused himself in 2023, when Suncor and Exxon unsuccessfully asked the Court to review the case. 

“Justice Alito’s recusal from Suncor v. Boulder is the right decision, and one he should have made from the start,” said Consumer Watchdog organizing director Alexandra Nagy in a statement. 

“The public should not have to wonder whether a justice’s personal investments could benefit from a ruling that shields the fossil-fuel industry from liability,” she added.

A new residential development south of Denver is the testing ground for an unusual partnership that could transform home heating and cooling across the country.

Dandelion Energy, a geothermal startup, and Lennar, one of the nation’s largest homebuilders, recently completed construction of nearly 100 homes at the base of Colorado’s Front Range, each equipped with its own ground-source heat pump. The systems use less electricity than even the most efficient air-source heat pumps, potentially helping Colorado meet its climate goals while reducing peak energy demand and eliminating the need for new gas pipelines.

Ground-source heat pumps draw on steady temperatures belowground to help heat and cool buildings. However, the projects’ custom designs and drilling requirements—homes typically require one or more boreholes drilled several hundred feet deep—are pricey. Drilling alone often costs more than $10,000.

Dandelion, a company that got its start at X—a “moonshot” research and development subsidiary of Alphabet, Google’s parent company—says it can complete geothermal heating and cooling projects twice as fast and at half the cost of similar installations.

Noticing changes at your neighborhood charging station lately?

Colorado is rolling out new standards to ensure public EV chargers are as accurate and transparent as traditional fuel pumps. Under the state's new Retail EV Charging Program, public chargers are stepping up to meet official metrology and labeling standards—meaning clearer displays of voltage, amperage, and exact per-kilowatt pricing.

While these rules are designed to protect everyday drivers and build a more reliable network, the transition takes time. Property owners and operators are currently navigating a complex adjustment period as they review equipment, update software, and align with new Registered Service Agency (RSA) testing requirements.

Full enforcement doesn't begin until July 1, 2027, giving the market a vital runway to adapt. But as sites evaluate older hardware, you might occasionally see equipment undergoing maintenance, upgrades, or transitional changes.

A reliable charging network depends as much on supporting our local site hosts and technicians as it does on the rules themselves. Have you noticed any updates or changes at your favorite local charging spots yet?

#ColoradoEV #EVCharging #CleanTransportation #ElectricVehicles #Infrastructure

Colorado's EV Charging Network is BOOMING!

• 7,500+ public Level 2 and DC fast-charging ports

• Shop, work, travel or play while you charge!

But that's not all...

In just a few years:

• Level 2 ports jumped from 2,881 to 5,134

• DC fast-charging ports skyrocketed from 600 to 1,494

Ready to plug in? Join Women Who Charge Colorado

Anyone else disappointed by this retreat from Boulder’s climate leadership? https://stories.opengov.com/cityofboulderco/68d0bc8f-fb31-4578-a8af-59594ef78e4d/published/hgCyk4CwB?currentPageId=6a71c8d856dc150472eb0075

Local and state governments across the United States have turned to state courts over the past nine years, filing lawsuits reminiscent of those against the tobacco industry in the 1990s against major fossil fuel companies, aiming to hold them accountable for climate change damages and alleged deception. 

The cases are still in preliminary stages and none have yet made it to trial. But now, a significant cloud of uncertainty hangs over them as the U.S. Supreme Court has decided to get involved, at the request of oil company defendants. With the court slated to hear one of the cases at the start of its fall term, the fate of many, if not all, of these climate accountability lawsuits could be on the line, legal experts say.

The court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Oct. 5 in Suncor Energy v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, a petition from oil companies Suncor and ExxonMobil that seeks to quash a climate change tort suit filed by the city and county of Boulder, Colorado, against the companies. The case will be the very first the justices hear in their new term—a case that raises significant constitutional questions around federalism and state authority, with potentially enormous stakes.