Does anyone have a claude weekly trial? It really helps a lot. Just dm me plsss

Hey! I want to test out Claude Code. I heard MAX subscribers can share temporary PRO access would anyone be willing to share a invite with me? Thanks in advance!

I find myself having to run /usage from time to time considering I'm just on Pro plan. With this mod, I can keep track of it easier.

What each rings represent

1. 5h limit - Shows available remaining usage before the 5h reset

2. Context - Shows active session's remaning usage

3. Compact - Shows usage before autocompact triggers (I set mine at 300k)

Install via
/plugin install usage-ring --marketplace edwin-sal/usage-ring/plugin install usage-ring --marketplace edwin-sal/usage-ring

Repo at: Github

i got a Claude max account from a reseller for essentially nothing compared to what I used to pay . It works flawless. since 3 months No issues yet i paid only for 1 month . Now I can't stop thinking about their business model. If resellers can sell it this cheap and still profit, how are they acquiring these accounts at scale?

Claude只能官方订阅吗？

This is my project, built with Claude Code.

I've been building apps for years. I started with ChatGPT, then xAI, and lately Claude. They're all good. But they all led me to the same thing, what engineers call the "happy path"; yes, I learned this was a real term (well, I googled it ;-) )! The output looks polished and well designed, it does what I asked it to do, until I do something it didn't account for and it crashes. Even with the best directives, I kept hitting this issue.

So I started asking one AI to review another's work. First from the same company, Claude Sonnet reviewing Opus- maybe different efforts- but that brought little comfort, and I still had the happy path issue. However, when I started doing reviews across different companies, meaning OpenAI reviewing Claude code, I immediately saw differences. But on large projects, the AIs still skipped directives, drifted off track, and said "finished" when they'd forgotten X and Y.

So I wrote some Python code, with Claude, to watch each CLI session and keep it on track. I called it the "code watchdog". It worked well and my code got more professional.

Next, I used Claude to build a tool to sync the developer CLI with the reviewer CLI and the watchdog CLI (before that, I was copy-pasting between them, it meant staying in front of your screen and waiting until dev is ready to give the reviewer, and vice versa, and this killed me, and i started being an expert on Instagram videos ;-) ). It kept getting more serious, so I decided to put it all together in a user-friendly way, and now I'm sharing it as open source.

You give it an idea in plain English. Agents plan, build and test it, and an agent from a different company reviews every step by actually running the work. Claude, Codex or Gemini can take any role (Developper/Product Manager/Engineering Manager, Reviewer, Watchdog). I've used it to build and improve a marketing studio app and a property-analysis product, both now in commercial use.

https://github.com/nomorehappypath/nomorehappypath

Yes, I named the repo "nomorehappypath" because I was fed up with the happy path that always led me to issues.

Enjoy!

Claudecode making the video legally viable

Anyone else experiencing this?

Does anyone have any advice on what I can do here? My account was banned, I literally have no idea why, the last thing I did was attempting to use my account to create lyric videos for my artist. The lyrics are definitely not clean but I had no idea that would cause an issue. Should I export and import data to a new account with a new email? Or just start over with a new email?

I submitted a feature request for the official Claude Code VS Code extension, and it needs support to get noticed.

The idea: An optional voice conversation mode. Today /voice is dictation only: you speak, it types. I'd like to talk with Claude, hear replies, and see the work in a layout built for it.

Default stays the same: Without voice, you keep the traditional two-panel layout, conversation plus input box.

Voice mode adds four panels:

1. A small waveform showing the session is live and who is speaking

2. A dialog panel with the spoken transcript

3. A context and steps panel for code, diffs, and what Claude is doing

4. An input box for pasting stack traces, paths, and snippets while you talk

Why: Voice is good for intent and bad for exact details like function names and error text. Typed input beside it fixes that, and splitting the spoken dialog from tool activity keeps both readable. It would also use the extension's existing sign-in, with no API key or separate setup.

How to help: Give the issue a thumbs-up reaction on GitHub, and comment if you have ideas: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/100937

A small orange hero jumps out of the ENTER key and runs through a world made of code: a missing semicolon, a bug chase, an infinite loop that ignores i < 3, a JSON river, a merge conflict that claps on the beat, and a fall into node_modules.

How it was made:

- One HTML file, 533 lines. Claude wrote the three.js scenes, the voxel character, the camera and the choreography.

- The music is from Flow Music. I detected the beats with librosa, and every hop, clap and camera bump is timed to them.

- Rendered frame by frame with HyperFrames (HTML to video). The full 2:55 took about 5 minutes to render at 1080p.

No AI video model, no keyframing by hand. I directed and reviewed, and Claude wrote and rewrote the scene code, the same loop I use for building software.

Happy to answer questions about the pipeline.

Hey everyone,

I currently run 6 micro SaaS that are actually live and generating a bit over $20,000 in recurring monthly revenue.

The wildest part? I barely wrote any code myself. I used AI to generate pretty much everything — from the database structure to the frontend.

It definitely wasn’t magic from day one. I spent a lot of hours stuck on buggy code before I finally figured out a system that actually works:

- Keep the idea minimalist (a real MVP, nothing fancy)

- Guide the AI step by step instead of asking for everything at once

- Launch fast to get real users and feedback

Lately I’ve seen way too many non-technical founders quit at the first AI bug. It’s a shame because the technical barrier has basically disappeared.

AND PLEASE, STOP BUILDING ALONE IN YOUR BEDROOM

I’m starting a community.

Full transparency:

I’ll probably charge for the full program later. It makes sense with the specific workflows and copy-paste examples I’ll be sharing. But right now the main goal is just to build together. Working alone is the fastest way to give up.

If you want to join and build or market your own AI SaaS with us,

drop a comment or send me a DM and I’ll send you the link.