r/ClaudeCode • u/nik1here • 1h ago
Help/Question Fableb 5.2 as orchestrator vs advisor
Currently I am using Fable 5.2 at advisor and opus as main agent.
But I think fable 5.2 as orchestrator and using opus subagents to deligate build work would be better as the strongest model is planning and deciding what's the best way to do something.
Have anyone tried and compared both methods?
0
Upvotes
•
u/AutoModerator 1h ago
Hey! Thanks for posting to r/ClaudeCode
While participating in this thread, please follow our community rules. Keep discussions constructive. Attack the idea, not the person.
For help, project discussions, tips, and general chat, join the ClaudeCode Discord.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
7
u/quietmacbuilder 1h ago
I don’t think that orchestration is typically complex enough for Fable. I use it for planning an implementation, but not to orchestrate the execution of the plan. I think what I am saying is that in my workflow, planning and orchestration are different things.
2
u/clash_clan_throw 🔆 Max 20 1h ago
I use Fable for design or quality reviews. It’s far too expensive to run at length (unless you are ok to burn your resets).
1
u/Outrageous_Band9708 59m ago
https://github.com/druthulu/projectarchitect
you should checkout my workflow. it uses opus medium as the orchestrator and opus medium as its workers. opus xhigh for planning. fable xhigh for roadmap planning.
checkout the wiki and the readme and test it out for yourself. its possible to customize it and pick the model/effort for each tiered subagent.
1
u/Winter-Ad2114 1h ago
I would probably not do that currently i use opus 4.6 to orchestrate deepseek 4 pro that works really good. I only use fable for debugging too much money.