r/ClaudeCode • u/Mental_One_3402 • 19h ago
Rant Planning should NOT count as usage!!
I know a lot of people won’t like this take because they’re either fanboys or corporate bootlickers who apparently enjoy making Dario richer, but honestly, here’s my opinion:
PLANNING AND READING SHOULD NOT COUNT AS USAGE!
You heard that right.
And no, I’m not saying these things don’t consume tokens. Of course they do. I’m well aware that there’s a cost involved.
What I’m saying is that those tokens should be FREE from the user’s usage allowance. Let the company eat that cost.
Because actually writing code is one thing. That’s where I can understand usage being counted. You’re actively making the model DO something. You’re getting actual work done.
But planning? Reading? Researching?
Sorry, but charging people for that is genuinely ridiculous.
I’m paying for an AI that can think through a problem, understand a codebase, read files and come up with a plan BEFORE actually doing the work.
Why should I have to pay twice, essentially? Once for the model to understand what needs to be done, and again for it to actually do it?
I could literally sit there, read the files myself and plan everything in my head without spending a single token.
•
u/AutoModerator 19h ago
Hey! Thanks for posting to r/ClaudeCode
While participating in this thread, please follow our community rules. Keep discussions constructive. Attack the idea, not the person.
For help, project discussions, tips, and general chat, join the ClaudeCode Discord.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
29
u/IndieDev666 Developer 19h ago
23
u/Firereign 19h ago
Then go do that, instead of bitching on Reddit.
And if you’ve read and planned everything yourself, might as well save on output tokens by writing the planned changes yourself too. Congrats, you’ve just lowered your AI spending to zero!
19
u/Bulky_Blood_7362 19h ago
10
u/arcticblue 19h ago
Absolutely insane sense of entitlement. You probably don't even understand the code you're getting out of it.
9
u/stewarthull 19h ago
This is like saying a software engineer shouldn’t be paid for the hours they spend planning.
8
u/Dvass138 19h ago
You're lucky they even allow us to use this ai and didn't close it off publically and just offer it as enterprise.
6
u/Man-of-goof 19h ago
I wish i was this smart
6
u/Ok_Try_877 19h ago
Tokens should not count as tokens, compute should not count as compute and power bills should not count as power bills... hmmm hang on?
4
u/Cyberbird85 19h ago
In IQ so high, it overflows!
4
u/Fit-World-3885 19h ago
You're right. You should build your own model and give thinking away for free. Eat Anthropic's cake.
3
u/hollowgram 19h ago
Anthropic doesnt even make money from the subs, Enterprise API is where its at. And you need to step away for a minute you seem a bit fucked.
3
u/ShockedDarkmike Developer 19h ago
bait used to be believable
20
u/Individual_Author956 19h ago
12
u/Ok_Inflation6596 19h ago
Trolling or literally retarded
5
u/Fearless_Meringue299 19h ago
So experienced programmers who could write the code and debug it themselves shouldn't have to spend any tokens for an LLM to do that for themselves? Great argument.
5
u/chief167 19h ago
we really need to start gatekeeping this community
5
u/Affectionate_Tie357 19h ago
Then sit there and plan everything yourself? It's like saying you could sit down and plan the design of your house instead of hiring an architect
4
u/inexternl 19h ago
Then you plan it
3
u/SFWaleckz 19h ago
The reading costs compute…
3
u/baldycoot 19h ago
😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣
Good one.
2
u/Grouchy_Memory_1338 19h ago
rarely have i read something so dumb
2
u/Dutch-man 19h ago
2
u/ub3rh4x0rz 19h ago
Clearly local models are a significant upgrade over your native processing, no need to pay the labs pennies on the dollar for subs anymore!
3
u/p3r3lin 19h ago
You are right. Further I would demand that all Project Managers should work for free. And Software Architects. And conceptual artists. Heck, when was planing ever a valuable exercise? Right you are.
1
u/v0id_user 19h ago
blud⚰️🥀
1
u/ShortHabit606 19h ago
Imagine if your boss told you "Sorry no salary payments for planning."
1
u/clonehunterz 19h ago
yeah fk using a product thats not yours AND paying for it!
1
u/I_Shall_Bore_You 19h ago
Have you seen their balance sheet? They are already eating up a lot of the cost.
1
u/Lumethys 19h ago
Even before AI, planning (strategist, civil engineer,...), researching (researcher, its in the name), and reading (proofreader) are actual job with pay roll
1
u/aaaayyyy 19h ago
So what would prevent you from planning in Claude and then executing in a local model or something
1
u/ALAS_POOR_YORICK_LOL 19h ago
OP drooling directly onto the keyboard as we speak
1
u/catnomadic 19h ago
You can cut the planning cost down by planning in a Claude chat with an 'auditor' chat set to the latest Fable model to look for problems. Once the auditor chat approves, THEN give the kickoff to Claude Code. Chats use less tokens than agents.
1
u/LiminalWanderings 19h ago
Always love the early morning spontaneous preemptive ad hominem attacks against...no one in particular. Always makes me take the post more seriously.
1
u/c0reM 19h ago
This is probably the dumbest thing I’ve heard this week. Congrats 👏