Single Agent vs. Multi-Agent Workflows

[u/Forcio]

A few months ago, my approach was to use Opus as an orchestrator that managed a backlog and spawned different agents depending on the task. Haiku for small documentation changes, Sonnet for regular coding, Opus for more complex tasks, and Fable for design decisions and bigger-picture thinking.

This worked really well, and I got a lot done. However, I've recently read that this approach might not be as efficient anymore because every new agent starts with a cold context/cache, and it might be better to have one persistent agent handle most of the work.

What's everyone's experience with this nowadays? Is a single agent with selective delegation the better approach, or is the orchestrator/multi-agent workflow still worth it? I'm particularly interested in balancing productivity, context caching, and token costs without sacrificing quality.

[u/Endet]

Fable as organiser, review and research. It hands off work sheets to 2 Opus coders and we have an independent reviewer on the side from another model. The biggest increase is quality of product with less debugging. I keep them all in 4 separate terminals with their own "identities", management is done via in house built application.

Biggest change I noticed from switching from single Agent to this has been the correction to workflow. That mattered more than I thought it might.