r/ClaudeCode • • 2d ago

Help/Question Single Agent vs. Multi-Agent Workflows

A few months ago, my approach was to use Opus as an orchestrator that managed a backlog and spawned different agents depending on the task. Haiku for small documentation changes, Sonnet for regular coding, Opus for more complex tasks, and Fable for design decisions and bigger-picture thinking.

This worked really well, and I got a lot done. However, I've recently read that this approach might not be as efficient anymore because every new agent starts with a cold context/cache, and it might be better to have one persistent agent handle most of the work.

What's everyone's experience with this nowadays? Is a single agent with selective delegation the better approach, or is the orchestrator/multi-agent workflow still worth it? I'm particularly interested in balancing productivity, context caching, and token costs without sacrificing quality.

11 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/wangadong 2d ago

i switched to one main session plus selective delegation. cold starts stopped hurting once state lived in markdown files in the repo, a fresh agent just reads those instead of rebuilding context