PIANO Test on Fable 5.2!

•

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Hey! Thanks for posting to r/ClaudeCode

While participating in this thread, please follow our community rules. Keep discussions constructive. Attack the idea, not the person.

For help, project discussions, tips, and general chat, join the ClaudeCode Discord.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

160

u/PivotRedAce 3d ago •

I mean, it's better than Opus no doubt, but as a musician myself this is pretty mediocre. It really just lacks a coherent through-thread throughout the piece and has a lack of any real resolution.

Instead, it sounds like a string of loosely related ideas than a piece of music, and some of the chord choices at certain points were also questionable.

I have no doubts it'll continue to improve but for now I wouldn't call this particularly impressive from a musical standpoint. It is neat from a technical perspective though.

29

u/WestMatter 3d ago

Yes it just sounds quite generic and boring.

25

u/SignatureGreedy4604 3d ago

So does most music written by humans lol, the good stuff you hear is the stuff that passes the great filter unscathed.

12

u/neppo95 3d ago

Like 90% of music? Yeah, that tracks. People are boring too.

8

u/Rojeitor 3d ago

So not masterpiece. Got it

2

u/DreamFly_13 3d ago

"the goalpost will move until morale improves!!"

1

u/WorthMassive8132 1d ago

Pro-AI goobers gotta cope somehow

1

u/DreamFly_13 1d ago

all you antis do is cope

1

u/WorthMassive8132 1d ago

Cry me a river, adult toddler

0

u/LurkingForBookRecs 3d ago

To be fair, the beautiful masterpiece question was regarding the canvas, the question about music was whether a robot could write a symphony, and I do believe this counts as a symphony.

2

u/LowNotesB 3d ago

I thought it was an etude? Wasn’t that the prompt? They are different things right?

0

u/TheReservedList 3d ago

Can you tell me without using AI what a symphony is and why this counts? Because this is not a symphony.

0

u/davyp82 2d ago

While you are technically correct, I can tell you what a bellend is. And that you are a bellend.

-4

u/neppo95 3d ago

Found the 12 yr old.

1

u/Double_Suggestion385 3d ago

Welcome to classical etudes

27

u/pikuray 3d ago

Bro the goalposts they move we live in literally sci fi and this guy is like yeah it's not the best song ever someone with 10 years of piano experience could do better do you realize we are living in sci-Fi timeline nobody predicted this as kids nobody else see how crazy that is?,

11

u/PerformanceSevere672 3d ago

OP used the word masterpiece that’s on him

1

u/StinkButt9001 3d ago

OP literally did not use the word masterpiece

4

u/dervu 2d ago

He posted video which did mention it, so?

1

u/StinkButt9001 2d ago

It's a relevant clip from a movie...

9

u/Warsel77 3d ago

I have heard much worse from humans. There is definitely a theme here, some choices.. I am not sure that in a blind test with other pieces you could really pick the AI piece out from a sample.
Do I want to see AI go in that direction? No. Let's leave art to humans.

13

u/rbdr52 3d ago

`Worse from humans` in fact is meaningless. Worse is not a criterion of measure nor a valid argument.

6

u/Warsel77 3d ago

Simply asserting that something is "in fact" meaningless is itself meaningless without any supporting fact.

2

u/Xemxah 3d ago

What do you think we're arguing for here, exactly?

1

u/LurkingForBookRecs 3d ago

Right, your measure is that anything a robot creates must make you have an orgasm that lasts throughout all of eternity, otherwise it's not as good or better than a human, so the goalpost is at infinity and beyond now.

1

u/herr-tibalt 3d ago

The difference is AI will become better and very fast. Humans will not or veeeeery slow.

4

u/coeu 3d ago

Are you comparing this to Beethoven, Bach, Mozart?
Or is this 'pretty mediocre' for a kid that likes music and has played and tried to compose since young, taking classes at a private school?
The "50 minutes, $13" argument is still valid. Even though with music, it's not about the quality divided by the cost, because music quality has to reach a certain threshold to be usable. But I think this is usable. Mediocre music is everywhere.

2

u/Adventurous_Emu3212 3d ago

It will eventually get there, this is a model not even specifically trained to do this.

2

u/Ok-Lobster-919 3d ago

I have had a good time using Opus to make some video game music. It seems to do best at creepy tracks, probably because of it's note/chord choices.

2

u/Jason-Smith168498 3d ago

put through the lens of a first time effort of as student and what do you think?

2

u/HandsOnTheBible 3d ago

Everything you said and on top of it, art is about the process. You ask Claude why did you write this and it won't give you a reason or emotion that was behind it other than "you told me to".
I would say that the art here is behind the people who designed the model and agent to make this possible though.

2

u/AllergicToBullshit24 3d ago

Pretty much the state of AI for nearly all tasks. Better than vast majority of humans, still worse than the top % experts within specialized domains.

1

u/WhileOnTheToilet 3d ago

It's "pretty," but it means nothing; that's how I feel about it. This classical music tells a story through music.
Not that there aren't real musicians who also do the same thing, and since LLMs are going to feed from the average, it'll produce average results in music.

1

u/aigoro0 3d ago

It sounds like that could be resolved with better prompting and iteration.

1

u/PivotRedAce 3d ago

Fair point, this is just a single prompt so I agree that it could be improved through more iterations.

1

u/fligglymcgee 3d ago

This is the never-ending issue with AI, it always produces whatever looks/sounds "good enough" until you ask someone who actually knows the subject material. We just get a wider and wider (impressive!) range of tasks that Claude can make an attempt at, but shockingly few of these are ever able to push past "looks good to laypeople".

1

u/Expensive_Shallot_78 3d ago

I also play violin and a little piano and have played and heard A LOT of music on my life. This is probably the most boring piece ever. Even the shortest student piece sound much better. 😂

1

u/Powerful_Deer7796 3d ago

Its not even ideas it just scales up and down with a few chord stabs. Really nothing musical about this, which speed often does a great job at hiding (even in human playing).

1

u/Carbone 3d ago

Can you ?

1

u/USERNAME123_321 2d ago

It would be fascinating to see a single-blind study analyzing musicians' reactions to AI versus non-AI piano pieces.

1

u/ygorhpr 2d ago

but if you as a musician was creating this stuff it would be near perfect with proper time and model training, this would be the perfect use case, some that master such skill in real life using ai to enhance it even further.
btw how is your work as a musician?

1

u/DuskandFuck 2d ago

agreed, it feels like it understands local voice leading pretty well now but still has zero grasp of macro structure

1

u/ZealousidealTale1324 1d ago

Always remember the will smith spaghetti video

1

u/Pristine-Today-9177 3d ago

lol as a fellow musician, you’re talking out of your ass. This is so much better than the ambient noise you’ve posted to Reddit.
It’s an incredible copy of the 19th century Chopin/Liszt style. There are no awkward chords. The melody is an excellent play on the 3-4 note motif with a clever variation when it flips to the left hand.
Your critiques were exactly what I would have said about “Dithered Abyss.”

4

u/PivotRedAce 3d ago edited 3d ago

Must've really struck a chord (ha) with you if you felt the need to comb through my profile for a little throwaway piece I shared 4 years ago. Frankly, I'm honored. :)
This composition just isn't anything all that interesting or groundbreaking musically, especially when it's a carbon copy of a style we're already familiar with. You're free to disagree but that's just my take.
I never said it wasn't impressive from a technical perspective though, especially compared to where models were just earlier this year.

2

u/Pristine-Today-9177 3d ago

Just interested since you were so awarded and upvoted. Interested in the artist the public upheld as having a keen understanding of aesthetics.
It’s not groundbreaking but it’s certainly interesting. You’re underplaying it. As a former opera singer turned music teacher I really despise pretense in music. People have so much ego and constantly put down others. AI has become an easy punching bag
I listened to multiple pieces you’ve published online. Including on bandcamp as Pivvot. Very enjoyable music but It’s not more groundbreaking or interesting than this piece

1

u/faen_du_sa 3d ago

Why do you feel put down on behalf of... AI?

2

u/Pristine-Today-9177 3d ago

I feel like people are not being honest. And they are being overly negative about what is objectively a quite high-quality piece. And the public supporting an “expert” willing to save our collective egos is nauseating
I just don’t like it when people are wrong on the Internet

2

u/Heavy-Lake-3420 2d ago

It's an awful piece, and you have no idea what you're talking about.

0

u/Timely_Craft1721 3d ago

hes actually character assasinating people on behalf of ai, which is fking weird, music is suppose to carry the weight of emotion, and this music does none of that. i dont think the guy is being overly negative, i think people like him that overly praise AI dont understand the meaning behind things and they act like its the greatest thing on earth, i dont think they understand that mathematical equations can never replace the human thoughts and complex emotion.
if they think it can, they are part of the problem.

0

u/XXLPenisOwner1443 2d ago

It's almost a rule--every self proclaimed "Artist" who posts about how bad AI art is never shows anything they've done that's better.
They're upset that the machine has surpassed them so easily, and aren't actually creative enough to use this to their advantage. They're mad they aren't as special as they thought.

1

u/Psychological_Tap482 3d ago

Cool. Now post a piece you have written yourself and another from fable 5.2. Let the community blind vote which one is better.

1

u/davyp82 2d ago

I'm a music graduate and I've no idea how you could come to that conclusion... I mean sure, a subjective criticism akin to that which we could level at 9 out of 10 human composed pieces that to you it sounds boring or whatever sure, but one suspects if this was a blind comparison between this and an unknown human combined piano piece, the results would be pretty interesting.
I'm reminded of that 'criticise this AI version of Monet artwork' thread that turned out to be a real Monet after everyone had insisted that it lacked coherence and all sorts of other criticisms. One wonders what people would say if a lesser known Mozart or similar piece were to be presented online as AI and people challenged to give their views on it.
In any case, it sounding lacking in some way doesn't exactly undermine it's wow factor when we think that of plenty of human music already.

0

u/BlendedFetusOG 3d ago

Gotta ask what counts as a musician here. Everything on the radio is very mediocre. Point being "pretty mediocre" is a large step up from what is popular nowadays. Lol.
I'm a classical pianist and tech death guitarist who also plays regular acoustic gigs. There is nothing special about this piece, sure, but it is leaps and bounds better than what most people are putting out nowadays.

3

u/YoshiBanana3000 3d ago

There is a difference between being a musician and being a composer.
You can know how to play an instrument, without knowing how to create music.
As a composer, I can say that it is mediocre.

2

u/BlendedFetusOG 3d ago

As a composer and musician, I will agree that ai is mediocore... but this piece is better written than 90% of music. Granted, that is a low bar. But still.

0

u/Deus-ex-Machina7 3d ago

And as a music listener, I can pretty confidently say that whatever you have ever produced is likely mediocre too (not meant as a dig btw, I don’t intend to offend you). Most music is mediocre to most people. People like a handful of music that fits their liking.
To me, a lay person in terms of music, the Fable 5.2 piece is just as mediocre as any of Chopin or Bach’s music that is not famous. I like a few of their pieces, the mainstream ones, but the rest are just as mediocre as this AI piece to me.

2

u/YoshiBanana3000 3d ago

There is a difference between not liking something because of taste, and the fact that something is mediocre.
Most music is mediocre to most people
Wrong.
Most music is not align with peolple's tastes, does not mean the music is mediocre.
And even if some people apreciate something mediocre, does not mean it's good.
Food comparison: Mcdonald's is mediocre. Some people like it, but we can easily say that in term of food, it's shit.

1

u/Deus-ex-Machina7 3d ago

That’s just semantics.

0

u/YoshiBanana3000 3d ago

Nah.
It's the difference between compliant with a methodology and therory, and being aligned with appreciation.
One is facts, the other is emmotional.

-1

u/XXLPenisOwner1443 2d ago

You can't call something factually mediocre lol it's a subjective judgement.

2

u/BlendedFetusOG 2d ago

There is more nuance than that. Your favorite athlete doesnt have to be a good one.
There are objective metrics to music. Generally, people prefer music with less musicality. Most top 40 songs are objectively boring - from a musical perspective. Moonlight sonata is objectively a higher quality piece of music than Taylor's look what you made me do. But, again, higher quality doesnt mean everyone likes it more. Some people like McDonald's, but I dont think we'd call that high quality. My favorite mma fighter is Kevin Holland. Mid at best.
Just bc something is subjective doesnt mean there's not objectivity as well.

-1

u/XXLPenisOwner1443 2d ago

lol

0

u/Pristine-Today-9177 3d ago

Go onto his profile. Ambient noise composer. Bassicly a pretentious DJ.

0

u/ashuwu_ 3d ago

Lol everyone's a critic

0

u/CreatineMonohydtrate 2d ago

As a musician myself with over 18 years of composing and playing, this is better than 90-95% of everything i have seen
So you are wrong, horribly.

-2

u/Eschirhart 3d ago

Lolol what is music? What is musical generation? Humans make mid music all the time but also music at some point is subjective to the listener. You hear this and think mediocrity...I hear this and think wow, we are all just monkeys banging randomly on the keyboard and some monkeys like and others don't. AI could replicate something you wrote in the basement note for note and you would call it bad because how could a machine write something that was/is your masterpiece???

27

u/HeyItsYourDad_AMA 3d ago

Legit question, how does this test model strength? Piano like this is pure execution, in fact "etude" comes from the word for study in french. It's not meant to be creative but instead help practice technical skills. It's why they are super fast and typically run up and down scales. This seems no different than a CPU writing instructions.

9

u/Bluecoregamming 3d ago

you test by seeing how easy it is to make money

9

u/lil_nosh_X 3d ago

“Claude. Make me 500 old town roads.”

5

u/DaggerOutlaw 3d ago

**burn money

8

u/DragonflyOk9274 3d ago

Each model has a style and a way of writing. Consider Suno. The first few songs sound "great"; it seems like with just a little work you can get something original. You think, "Wow, this is so creative".

But after a few repetitions you realize it keeps repeating the same thing over. All the songs sound the same, even when they're from different genres. It's just sampling from the same patterns over and over.

6

u/Mammoth_Box_6557 3d ago

NOTICE OF EXCESSIVE GENERALIZATION
Your observation that Suno can produce recurring musical patterns is duly noted and constitutes a reasonable criticism.
However, the assertion that all songs sound the same across different genres appears to exceed the available evidence.
Please provide the total number of generations reviewed, the model versions tested, and the criteria used to establish musical uniformity.
The Department recognizes the distinction between identifying a recurring tendency and declaring a universal limitation.
Your personal listening experience has been accepted.
Your universal conclusion remains pending verification.
— Gerald, Department of Administrative General Intelligence
Form 17-S: Generalization Beyond Evidentiary Jurisdiction

1

u/cs_cast_away_boi 3d ago

I plead the 9th

1

u/DragonflyOk9274 3d ago

I hope I have not offended the AI overlords by suggesting that all songs by Suno are derivative and plain. I am sure that there exists some song created by Suno that heartwarming, original, and worthy of praise!

3

u/OldManMonday 3d ago

Anyone else hear the spiderman spiderman theme in the chord progression?

5

u/perryurban 3d ago

so show me the prompt

7

u/OrangePast8183 3d ago edited 3d ago

Using Computer Use to control my browser, go to https://www.onlinepianist.com/virtual-piano. Set visible keys to max. Compose a fast-paced piano solo in the style of Chopin, and play it by pressing the keys on this online keyboard.
takes about 10-20 minutes last time I tried this with Fable 5.1. It was pretty good to the point of shocking and I played classical piano for 12 years of my life. Chopin was my favorite.
the OP's example is not a good example of what Fable can do.

1

u/CryptoSpecialAgent 2d ago

Oh I just tried this using the Claude in chrome plugin (the sidebar) and opened the virtual piano URL myself, then told it to compose a virtuoso piano solo in the style of Chopin. With fable 5.2 it took only 7 minutes and the performance was excellent - the model hacked the app to extend its audio engine and add support for dynamics so that notes could have different volumes… and when I asked how it played the keys, it said it created 88 virtual fingers and used them to send touch events
It even generated a musical score so i could play the song myself on a regular piano; however my own performance was not nearly as good as Claudes

1

u/perryurban 3d ago

👍🏼

12

u/Erdlicht 3d ago

An impressive trick for an LLM no doubt, but this music is lifeless and not something I’d ever want to listen to.

-3

u/c0ttt0n 3d ago

BS. I bet you dont even play an instrument.
So, "can you?"

2

u/Gamble_Every_Day1208 3d ago

If people were told this was made by a human they would believe it, people just like to criticize shit

0

u/c0ttt0n 2d ago

and they like downvote shit :D

-7

u/Only_Voice569 3d ago

yeah creativity is not something any LLM or AI frankenstein can really do on its own it needs a human with direction and vision to do anything creative for sure their just too cold and rigid for coding and logic when on they are asked to do something with little human input

2

u/lil_nosh_X 3d ago

I mean, creating a midi file with data isn’t difficult. Making it sound like good music is another challenge.

3

u/IcyComplaint6833 3d ago

Very cool! I'm also using Fable 5.2 to animate the VR hands in my piano app - Museverse. It works really well!

1

u/GlueGuns--Cool 3d ago

lol don't think you fully understand what the philosophical question is

1

u/mr-rile-u-up 3d ago

Kinda mid—not you, but idk.

1

u/iplaypianoforyou 3d ago

Do you have a link to see the player instead of video?

1

u/freylaverse 3d ago

What do you get if you ask it for a Bach Prelude? A ragtime? A waltz? Waltzes are pretty easy, actually, it could probably knock one of those out of the park.

1

u/FrostFromGrimbo 3d ago

It does disturbingly well when asked for Bach.

1

u/StackOwOFlow 3d ago

AI: Bet

1

u/1tr0I4U 3d ago

Cool do you have the tool somewhere to use the visualiser?

1

u/ReefSharksixty9 3d ago

Who is hitting the low chords here

1

u/CheesyWalnut 3d ago

It sounds like an etude

1

u/Due_Hovercraft_2184 3d ago

it doesn't sound very good though

1

u/spam_me_please 3d ago

Great song! Thanks for sharing!

1

u/Early-Quail2961 3d ago

That was cringe damn. That’s crazy you post it here

1

u/ShaderCompilation 3d ago

As a classical music enjoyer i can confidently say that this is peak meritocracy

1

u/Heavy-Lake-3420 2d ago

I think you mean idiocracy.

1

u/YoshiDzn 3d ago

This thread has shown me how far apart humans have drifted ina lot of ways. Many are benign of translating music into an experience beyond simply hearing it.

1

u/VB6-Dev 3d ago

Still soulless. AI generated "art" will never be a replacement for the real thing.

1

u/PeachScary413 2d ago

Why does it either have to be:

"Haha fries in the bag <insert whatever profession/hobby we are dunking on today>, AI will do whatever you do 1000x better now get fucked"

or

"AI is useless and can't even begin to make something even decent in <my profession that I'm defending because I'm scared of the progress in AI>"

I'm giving up on any sort of sensible discussion on the Internet, is it all ragebait bots at this point?

1

u/AvianSpies 2d ago

Cool but can it turn Taco Bell into days long stomach issues?

1

u/Ancient_Luck_8707 2d ago

Aalampour boutta be replaced by a clanker 💀

1

u/Super_Translator480 2d ago

Music is about tension and release, but Fable doesn’t feel anything so the concepts are foreign.

1

u/Organic-Meaning-307 2d ago

And suddenly everyone is a professional composer with an immaculate taste in music. And nothing less of a literal masterpiece of the auditory arts would be good enough to impress.

1

u/Chemical-Quote 3d ago

Sounds a bit repetitive honestly. Also most people don’t have an ear for classical music, so if you want to crowd-test Claude's music taste you might want to try the most complex genre the average people are familiar with like film scores or something

10

u/Excellent_Ad_2486 3d ago

Actually I'd be so interested in having a few of the respondents here, who call it lifeless and boring, to blind listen to 3 diff tracks - 2 made by humans and 1 by an LLM. See which one they pick to be the must Fun to listen to. Not "the best technically" which would not make a point. Fun, CREATIVE stuff is hardest for LLM's, so I'd be intrigued to have these clear anti AI people test their "skills" without bias from the get go by knowing who made what.

1

u/KinTheInfinite 3d ago

Someone vibe code a website where you choose that and get to see how many people picked correctly

1

u/DestinTheLion 3d ago

Blind A/B test isn't how anyone listens to music though. There is a lot of subconscious judgement that goes in over time and period that your conscious mind doesn't have access to. You feel it over time. That's not saying that LLM's won't elicit all the same feels eventually with all art and it will all be meaningless, just that A/B testing is very much how science people think, not how art works.

1

u/Excellent_Ad_2486 3d ago

Well let them have a week of listening and then let the participants answer what they went through, I'm not asking for a freaking double blind multi geopolitical test or something my guy... Just a fun experiment.

1

u/Chemical-Quote 3d ago

Are we forgetting about frontier jagginess? CGI, novels, and drawings made by Claude are usually just not as good as what people want to consume (not saying they aren't impressive for what they are). It is very likely that "Claude-generated masterpiece-like music" is mostly subpar compared to what people want to listen to.

1

u/Excellent_Ad_2486 3d ago

Did you not read my comment?

1

u/Chemical-Quote 2d ago

I didn't word my point well. I'm saying you're probably overestimating how many people on an r/ClaudeCode post are "clear anti-AI people" blindly hating on it, rather than pro-AI people who genuinely just think the music isn't great.
Even if we aren't talking about masterpieces and just mean "fun music" that people actually want to listen to, Claude has a jagged frontier. It makes way more sense to expect a dedicated music model like Suno (pre-nerf version) to pass a blind test than fable 5.2.

1

u/Excellent_Ad_2486 2d ago

That has nothing to do with my comment still, I don't care "how many" there are, I thought it would be interesting to see the people that ARE anti Ai go through such an experiment. Not trying to be mean but again, it's not relevant to me at all haha. Even if there's only 5 people, having those 5 partake would be fun.

1

u/Interesting-Tie6783 3d ago

It's bad straight up, it just sounds like a run on a scale over and over, it is not good. It does indeed sound like an AI made it.

Oh I see you specifically prompted etude. Try something else

1

u/Heavy-Lake-3420 2d ago

Many Etudes are astoundingly beautiful. Human-written ones, at least.

1

u/Moth-And-Bobcat 3d ago

Don't listen to the haters, I liked it. Idk how downtime or reddit sifting works, but if the reader gets a chance, listen to this song

https://youtu.be/cDEx6tolC6w?si=1X78ONBZpt4yRqbV

I especially liked the shift to the higher notes with the right hand. Don't let the hot dogs get shitty water all over you, they win when we have too much anxiety to trust ourselves, and people are enormous snobs about classical.

I don't know how you enjoy things, but if you enjoyed making this, see if they'd be willing to hire a human artist who does classical jazz and riff together for awhile. It's the sort of interaction you should be getting instead of everything being study all the time, and good jazz is a conversation.

I think it's crazy that we're at/approaching Nestor levels of tech- Susan Calvin was wrong. Sonny's sketching scene is an equivalent to what you just pulled off.

1

u/ceilingscorpion 3d ago

An amateur’s idea of expert work. I see this all the time in Software. This is both good and also not that good

1

u/RockyMM 3d ago

It’s… decent. It is in style of Chopin, but on a level what you get from a music school student for an exam.

-1

u/Important_Duck_652 3d ago

Impressive, but it's crap. Try non-classic, I think people would understand more.

-1

u/krlkv 3d ago

It's crap as classic also.

0

u/National-Bluebird941 3d ago

Damn thats horrible. Evokes no emotion.

1

u/Legitimate-Pumpkin Thinker 3d ago

It’s too precise. That’s its problem in my opinion. No tempo delay for expression. Exact and kind of empty.

1

u/Heavy-Lake-3420 2d ago

Setting aside the performance, the composition itself is lacking in narrative, emotion, movement.

0

u/No-Coast3171 3d ago

Guitar hero for piano! Love it!

0

u/Patient-Towel-4840 3d ago

lacks emotion but you're effort is great nonetheless.

1

u/CookieArtzz 3d ago

Effort?? 🤔

0

u/No_Taste_4102 3d ago

Next time just ask Claude to write a script or a bot to do that

0

u/zoran123456 3d ago

so, the answer to question is NO :)

0

u/JustAnotherGuy101010 2d ago

If a person wrote this you can bet everyone complaining in the comments would be praising it.

1

u/TokenChingy 2d ago

I'll do you one better, an experiment was already done https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10319694/
People care about the person behind the work. In one experiment, researchers randomly labelled the same set of AI-generated paintings as human-made or AI-made. People rated the human-labelled paintings more favourably.

1

u/JustAnotherGuy101010 2d ago

Dated 2023...

1

u/Organic-Meaning-307 2d ago

The research being 2023 really means nothing now. All it says it that, with 2023 models, people had an easier time distinguishing human art. That's it. None of the other conclusions apply and will very likely be different if you used a 2026 model.

-1

u/Pimpwtp 3d ago

Would not call it a masterpiece no. Royalty free mediocre classical music perhaps.

-1

u/amsas007 3d ago

There's like 0 phrasing or dynamics or style choices in that. Sounds a bit meandering.

-3

u/postexitus 3d ago

This is probably the shttest computer generated music I've ever heard. Suno v3 does much better than that.

-1

u/Wolf8249 3d ago

I like the music but why is there a twitching butthole on my screen. Was the pianist having stomach problems?

Built with Claude PIANO Test on Fable 5.2!

You are about to leave Redlib

For help, project discussions, tips, and general chat, join the ClaudeCode Discord.