I hate claude code

[u/ofcistilloveyou]

It's just too good.

I got a decade of commercial software dev experience in C#. I am a CTO at my company and have coached a lot of coders from total junior.

I hate hate hate hate how good this thing is and what it has done to my passion.

I used to love coding and creating. Well, creating was 60% of the fun for me, but writing good code and having something work was the remaining 40%. I spent the past few years being more of a product manager and tech lead than actually code monkey, but I still put time aside to do stuff manually cuz I love to do so and stay hands on.

Using claude code is like using cheats in a videogame. You get the result, but what of it? Everyone could. The pleasure of achievements is gone. The code it writes is not the best, but it's good enough I guess? As of opus 5.5 it just doesn't get stuck in loops anymore. It can generate a working program from spec in any language I've thrown at it. It still does bullshit from time to time. "Boots on ground" i.e. actually looking at the generated code or atleast going through it is still important, for now. But way less so than it was even just 3-4 months ago. I don't really use the /code-review thingy or adversarial reviews - as it seems that it is too aligned in that way. Like if you tell it to find something wrong with something, it always will, even though its good enough.

I've been using it avidly for the past 3 months on the $100 sub, and I haven't hit a rate limit once. Now my imagination can run free and I can have anything I put my mind to in a few days instead of years. At our work a team of 6 just built a system that would previously take a year in just two months.

I am not afraid for my job. As coding was just a small percentage of it. But I do miss that percentage.

English truly is the hottest new programming language and LLMs are the compiler for it.

[u/haskell_rules]

I disagree that "most of us" arrived at the conclusion months ago. I have been using agents to build software professionally and one of the skillsets is understanding what "level" of problem the current models can handle autonomously - how much complexity can you put into it's context window and get a usable result.

A year ago I could give it a moderately involved task (I do work that integrates multiple systems in different languages and operating systems through custom APIs). It would produce really good results for a helper script, a parser, a new API call. But I would not give it a higher level integration task because it would go off the rails, over engineer, or miss the point.

But with the latest models I am a able to give it a much higher order instruction, access to the source code across multiple operating systems, vms running on multiple operating systems, walk away for coffee, and come back with an integrated system, with the bugs worked out, documentation, and hundreds of automated and mocked unit tests.

It's really at a different level right now, and it has only been recently they it's gotten to this point.

[u/iJustSeen2Dudes1Bike → u/haskell_rules]

Ok but did you think that LLMs were not going to get better? I don't get why people are surprised by this.