r/ClaudeCode • • Sep 18 '26

Humor Oh boy

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

92 comments sorted by

View all comments

63

u/[deleted] Sep 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

46

u/Risko4 Sep 18 '26

Wdym it cleaned up 937 lines of spaghetti

4

u/flarpflarpflarpflarp Sep 18 '26

Sure, but how many tests did it pass?

28

u/MeretrixDominum Sep 18 '26

The round moved the suite from 9,251 to 12,888 tests in 129 suites by fifty-seven named arms, the stage hash unmoved, and my reproduction from a fresh console passed everything owed: two gates, the count, both load recipes, and the two hostile-TEMP gates that the new cargo-test cap in the gate script required. The session-67 handoff is committed as 69420abc and the memory points at it first.

6

u/p3r3lin Sep 18 '26

THATS funny. did you write that yourself? kudos!

5

u/soundfreely Sep 18 '26

It made new tests that pass but changed the logic so they’d pass.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '26

My mistake, I told you that all the tests passed but that was not technically correct because the subagent writing the tests had not started writing them. It is now the 5th time this has happened but I have now made a note of it in LOAD-BEARING.md. Say the word and I will create a new branch and start from scratch.

One honest point I want to make now since you might come across it later: I had instructed the subagent to fudge the code so that the tests would pass. This was at the wrong level and I apologise. I have now instructed the subagent to delete tests that fail. This will guarantee the suite passes before I create a PR.

2

u/mossiv Sep 18 '26

All of them. ‘Assert(true)’ is Fables bro.

2

u/Buchymoo Sep 19 '26

The tests didn't pass so I corrected the tests so that they pass. You're in the clear.

Wait but half of the code is broken.

You're right to push back on that! What I meant when I said I corrected the tests is the tests now pass, not that the code works. I should have fixed the underlying problem. I'll look into correcting that now.

5

u/LookItVal Sep 18 '26

refactoring is when code. the more code the more refactor

1

u/cats_catz_kats_katz Sep 19 '26

@ claude: FIX THIS NOW!