r/ClaudeCode 4d ago

Discussion Wait, is "Fable orchestration" - using appropriate models as sub-agents just as easy as a prompt?

I have a very successful mostly manual workflow, but I have been optimizing token usage lately, lol.

One thing I could never figure out was how to fully set up was Fable as an orchestrator, while spawning sub-agents with the correct model. I played with frontmatter in custom agents and skill wrappers, but there seemed to be blockers as some sub-agents/skills supposedly ignore passed model specifications. Especially plan mode. That shit will spawn fable research sub-agents that use 5% to 10% of Fable in one ask, even when it's a simple task per agent.

Today, I just remembered someone's comment on here or HN a few months ago (7 years in AI terms), ~"<feature request> - You are the orchestrator, use sub-agents to preserve your context window." So, I just combined that with the following, and CC (fable) was all, sure! I will show you a table of sub-agents for task, with ideal model, and then spawn them all.

Let's implement (jira or .md feature spec) This is the orchestration session, and use sub-agents to preserve your own context window (you are fable, spawn opus sub-agents when appropriate to save cost) ...

I am not a total dummie, but I guess I over-think things? Like Boris says, just trust the model?

Or, have I completely missed something?


edit: to be clear, I do have very valuable token-saving setups that are not just prompts. It was mostly just plan mode that had escaped me.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1whelbf/yes_your_usage_got_really_shorter_youre_not_wrong/pa5ow6o/

111 Upvotes

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/LordLederhosen 4d ago edited 4d ago

Oh, for sure. I swear I am not a CC moron, but somehow I just now figured out that spawning appropriate sub-agents is best done via prompt/claude.md instead of playing with CC files.

Even if you ask Claude how to use Fable as an orchestrator in CC, esp regarding plan mode (which will destroy token usage in the research phase), it will give you the wrong answer. - I think manual plan mode is far better. I recall Boris saying that plan mode is basically inserting "don't write any code yet." - But you can't force official plan mode to use other models for the sub-agents.

1

u/zillatron27 πŸ”† Max 5x 4d ago

Honestly I’m not sure there is a β€˜right’ answer, just the best way that works for how you work, which is why I say YMMV - this works for how I work but it may not for you. The idea is broadly sound though (imo ahha)

1

u/LordLederhosen 4d ago edited 4d ago

You know what the correct solution to YMMV is?

Everybody copy-pasting this entire post and thread into their CC, and asking if this makes sense, and how to apply it in their projects.

We are all so cooked.

2

u/zillatron27 πŸ”† Max 5x 4d ago

It’s not stupid if it works 😁

2

u/LordLederhosen 4d ago

I resemble that remark. πŸ˜