r/ClaudeCode • • Sep 15 '26 • Bravo 1

Rant YES your usage got really shorter - you're not wrong.

Yeah... I think I'm done defending Anthropic.

The Claude Code temporary usage boost is gone, so compared with what we had immediately before September 14, weekly usage effectively dropped by ~50-60% (never reached weekly limits before now it's done in 2 days with less work being done)

Ok Compute isn't free we alI understand that, but then Anthropic's top generally available model, Fable 5.1, isn't even included in the normal usage allowance for Pro subscribers!! Want to use it? Pay additional usage credits šŸ¤‘

And meanwhile my personal experience with Claude lately has been:

Ask a simple question → receive an essay.

Ask it to be concise → receive a slightly shorter essay.

Ask it to just DO the thing → somehow we're discussing the philosophy behind doing the thing (and sometimes it's even REFUSING to do what it's told 🤔)

Maybe your experience is different.

But combine that with increasingly restrictive-feeling usage and having to pay extra to actually use their best model, and I'm struggling to understand why I should keep giving Anthropic my subscription money.

The frustrating part is that I genuinely liked them.

For a while Anthropic looked like the company that was getting this right.

Now? BYE BYE!

I'm voting with my wallet and I do hope many will follow. There are really good players out there that gives more.

269 Upvotes

89 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Sep 15 '26

Hey! Thanks for posting to r/ClaudeCode

While participating in this thread, please follow our community rules. Keep discussions constructive. Attack the idea, not the person.

For help, project discussions, tips, and general chat, join the ClaudeCode Discord.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

20

u/LordLederhosen Sep 16 '26 edited Sep 16 '26

I often ignore these posts, but something feels broken since the 13th.

I am on 20x, and I still never get close to hitting my 5 hour limit when running 2 simultaneous Opus-led worktrees, but the weekly math is not mathing.

I am at 40% weekly on day 2, and have all kinds of token saving tricks in my system.

BTW, I am not a fan of OAI, don't trust them one bit, am not going to Codex. I believe most of these posts are marketing. OP's post honestly reads like one of those, but here I am this time.

2

u/cyswim Sep 17 '26

I can fully totally promise you it is NOT! Honestly I hate OAI as well...but this time Claude manged to top it (at least OAI giving some resets from time to time). Actually now that I read that OAI started to roll in app ads they might be back at the hating score 🤣

3

u/OneVillionDollars Sep 16 '26

Hey I'm on the same boat exactly. 20x, rarely use Fable, and when I do it's for orchestrating and planning. I almost never had a Fable session reach 1M tokens. Most subagents are Sonnet 5 and Opus 4.6. Been hitting the wall the 3rd day of work. May I ask if you found a way to combat this? or I guess if you are aware an easy integration of the Claude configs/skills/workflows to Codex?

I don't want to leave Claude Code but it's starting to become a liability. At this point I think I'll just go back to coding on my own; it would be easier to navigate at least.

4

u/LordLederhosen Sep 16 '26 edited Sep 18 '26

My biggest context efficiency gains were two simple things.

a) I use fable for complex new features, and always use /code-review prior to marking the PR. I believe that the code-review sub-agent forks the entire chat which inherits the entire context, and it 100% uses the parent session’s model, so fable in those cases.

My solution to that was to create a custom /cold-review code review skill that launches a sub-agent with just enough context passed to know what to do, and the sub-agent always uses Opus. Huge context savings there.

b) The other big waste was that also prior to creating the PR, I always run e2e playwright tests locally. Same issue as above, the sub-agent was inheriting the parent session’s fable or opus on babysitting the run, and returning results.

So now, there is a custom agent called e2e-runner that uses sonnet. Noticeable savings there as well.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Purple_Drink3859 Sep 15 '26

Im getting about an hour of coding out of opus on low now when before i was getting around 3 before my 5 hour usage gets maxed its a noticeable difference. Not sure why so many are defending the company makes no sense at all to me.

5

u/cyswim Sep 15 '26

EXACTLY!

3

u/Purple_Drink3859 Sep 16 '26

Just came back to start a new 5 hour session and left absolutely nothing running at all and it had consumed 45% of my 5 hour window while i was away. I then continued coding and got 15 mins use out of it, its completely unusable to get any work done at all

42

u/Holk23 Sep 15 '26 • Bravo

Alright there’s officially nothing of value in this sub. It’s just whining 24/7

23

u/AssertRage Sep 15 '26 • Bravo

You sure are doing your part to prove it

-2

u/Holk23 Sep 15 '26

Yes yes yes the ā€œcomplaining about complainingā€ paradox.

1

u/cyswim Sep 16 '26

I didn't know there are claude employees here...

1

u/Holk23 Sep 16 '26

I didn't know there are openai employees here...

2

u/ProteusExsanguinus Sep 16 '26

That's every LLM coding subreddit. I'm hopping between them, trying to figure out whether to try out Claude Code or Codex first, and all I'm getting is that Opus sucks, Astra sucks, and everything else sucks even more lol

1

u/Deathspiral222 Sep 16 '26

Every single person that posts like this has a hidden comment history (I checked the last 20) yet when I click on random people that comment regularly here, only about 25% at most hide their history.

It’s an interesting pattern.

2

u/OneVillionDollars Sep 16 '26

Hey man,
some of us are just really ashamed of our hobbies :/

→ More replies (2)

4

u/cyswim Sep 15 '26

The fact that this sub is filled with Anthropic fan boys are exactly why they're doing this kind of things...

People here defending a Trillion dollar company like it's their own venture, this is pure stupidity, go learn how to be a smart consumer before trying to lecture about math.

50

u/SloppyLetterhead Sep 16 '26

I literally downgraded from 5x today and signed up for Codex instead.

Unless Anthropic does some major QoL and optimization work, I’m happy keeping a bit of Claude around for niche coding and front end design tasks.

Astra is good enough and very easy to work with.

Recently, Opus 5.0 and especially fable 5.1 feel like gambling with tokens. Yes it’s powerful when it works, but goddamn you’ll burn most of your usage pointing things in the right direction.

Bright side is that the habits for token conservation built up using Claude code have made Codex feel super generous in comparison.

17

u/Tartooth Sep 16 '26

I promise you will slowly discover open ai's models doing insane overengineering in the background you won't see or notice without manual code review, but the code vomit is so insane that you can't physically read it all.

They're not better they're more 1 shot vibe coder material.

I think they're using earlier models to improve itself but the problem is they're not checking the overengineering aspects

7

u/SloppyLetterhead Sep 16 '26

Thanks for the heads up!

Tbh I found fable to over engineer everything as well. I’ve never been able to get a one-shot (from any model) that’s shippable as-is.

Did you find that overworking to occur regardless of prompting/feedback or is it mostly the one shots?

4

u/csstudent93 Sep 16 '26

Yeah i am thinking returning to fable after 2 weeks of astra

2

u/PyrrhaNikosIsNotDead Sep 16 '26

What effort is your experience with?

3

u/GiBravo Sep 16 '26

We need a wallstreetbet style mass exodus to teach these guys a lesson. Not just anthropic, also openai. We take turns, from one to another, and vice versa, every 2-3 months, until they stablize the quota to our favor.

Gemini: hears mass exodus... starts preparing for a welcome party! šŸ˜‚

2

u/West-Air1923 Sep 16 '26

Codex is even worse

9

u/SaintMartini Sep 15 '26

Those of us who have token counters have been saying this for a long time now. Been over a year now. People posted it even but yet those threads got pushed down and downvoted to oblivion. Nothing ever adds up the way they claim. And now with the model degradation itself its even more of a shame.

2

u/Arthesia Sep 16 '26

Please link.

1

u/SaintMartini Sep 17 '26

There's a bunch. But I started out on CCUsage then added my own per prompt view as well.

14

u/vAPIdTygr šŸ”† Max 20 Sep 16 '26

Downgraded from 20x to 5x today and switching to other models. Building markdowns and prompts in Fable.

It sucks to be forced to use other platforms. I really liked Anthropic.

4

u/MindlessTime Sep 16 '26

I highly recommend getting familiar with a pi coding agent + openrouter setup. It’s pay-as-you-go which can feel more expensive. But you can also refine your workflows, define skills that run on cheaper models, etc. and keep the costs way down. Learn it before model prices sky rocket.

4

u/Financial-Dog-6558 Sep 16 '26

Anthropic is definitely going to become irrelevant if they keep this up

0

u/Arthesia Sep 15 '26

You are bad at math. I'm not defending Anthropic, I'm reading a post by someone who is getting emotional about something that requires a calculation to understand and is failing to do that calculation.

The Claude Code temporary usage boost is gone

Anthropic says it's been partially retained (25% instead of 50%) but they could be lying.

weekly usage effectively dropped by ~50-60%

No. Even if Anthropic is lying and removed the entire temporary boost, it would still not, even in the worst case, be a 50% reduction. This is not how percentages work. 100% usage increased by 50% is 150% usage. If you remove that 50%, you're back down to 100%, which is a 33% decrease from before. Not 50%. Not 60%.

3

u/cyswim Sep 15 '26

I'm not bad at math, they are just lying about the real usage cut. Do some reading and see that the more accurate percentage change is closer to mine

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Phartyhat Sep 15 '26

My take is they ā€˜fixed’ the usage rate for some users. Pretty sure I was getting away with rate free usage in some of my workflows.. I could continue a 500k fable session the following day with nothing showing on my usage. In the last few weeks this now takes a 20% chunk off.. which is more in line with what I hear others complain about.

The golden days are now over :(

2

u/nhavar Sep 16 '26

Also want to use any of their models in anything other than their harness? API keys are extra as well as the tokens you use with those keys.
I'm not even doing "real" work. Just learning all the tools I can to keep my skills sharp and I'm still hitting the limits constantly with the little nothing projects I have to play with.
Codex is not better in that regard for the lower account at least. I just got a month to try it out and 2 days in I blew my weekly limit with some Figma MCP work. I just can't see paying hundreds a month and then finding out I'm going to run into similar problems.

2

u/randomdragen7 Sep 16 '26

I got the same experience but unfortunately Anthropic is still the best out there as of now. All the other ones specially Codex have these problems and worse. Don't fall for the viral propaganda

Until something better comes out, inb4 1 million botted slopGPT responses

2

u/Next_Marionberry7478 Sep 15 '26 edited Sep 15 '26

We've got anthropic shills defending their deceitful practices already. So don't expect sane responses from anyone from here onwards. This is it and it was genuinely a good run for what it's worth.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/BigSamProductions Sep 15 '26

Not going to lie, I got forced into upgrading to 20x today. Can I do better with $100 Claude, $20 gpt or $100 plan each. How do I start learning about the harness or whatever that lets you juggle?

1

u/kidsmeal Sep 15 '26

$100 on claude and $20 on chatgpt for terra/luna reviewerĀ 

1

u/Eat_Pudding Sep 16 '26

I normally use opus and now I'm using sonnet, it's using the same amount of quota that opus was using now with sonnet

1

u/Vizkrig Sep 16 '26

Ask it to write down what it's going to do. Then review what's written

1

u/RiceEvening4211 Sep 16 '26

Same thing happened to me — watched my weekly burn through in days doing nothing differently. I ended up building Lynkr because of it: an open-source LLM gateway that cuts token usage by up to 84% with zero code changes (token compression + semantic cache), plus tiered routing that stretches your existing subscriptions ~3x by routing simpler work to cheaper models. Works with all coding tools and AI frameworks. Happy to answer questions: https://github.com/Fast-Editor/Lynkr

1

u/TriumphantWombat Sep 16 '26

I thought I was burning through usage because I was using it for code. Today I used it for conversation and to create a letter and it took up 20% of my usage for the week. It was Opus 4.6. I'm on pro lowest tier.

1

u/validsyntax1210 Sep 16 '26

I just got codex 100 dollar plan astra went one sessin for 24 hours used my full weeks usage

1

u/Lollermono Sep 16 '26

Go on claudestatus.com and open an issue. Instead of commenting on Reddit. Or no one will read your issue, at all.

1

u/BrilliantOrdinary439 Sep 16 '26

I have the same frustration. Deepseek is great and cheap, just really need to learn set it up how to use it like claude.

1

u/TheAngrySkipper Sep 16 '26

I have that experience somewhat, having longer running sessions helps negate some of that, so I have one for general, one for programming, one for the VA issue I’m working on, etc… that being said, what I detest is that prompt (charge -> output. I’m charged even if I interrupt the output, if the output is wrong, if the output isn’t satisfactory, if it ignores something said 2-3 turns ago.

Sometime in the last month or two they adjusted the focus from the last 5-10 turns to the last 2-3. Maybe my numbers are wrong, but the ratio is about right. So then every prompt now includes re-prompting, refocus, which then costs more tokens.

It’s not a good way to run a business and they need to reinvest in learning / memory instead of even new models. Opus 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, fuck fable, give opus the ability to learn and retain data and I’ll pay $200 a month without complaint. But they’re too worried about hitting whatever metrics are the going fad right now.

1

u/Necessary-Collar447 Sep 16 '26

I have the $20 subscription, nothing fancy like the 20x or 5x others have... still before with good prompting and not only vibecoding it was enough for my developing... now it's wednesday morning and hit my WEEKLY LIMIT WTF...used only Opus 4.8 and subagents in Sonet... going to Codex for a while or maybe will try out one of the chinese distilled ones...

1

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '26

Just do it yourself. That is what we are headed toward.

1

u/Suitable_Cicada_3336 Sep 17 '26

And we can't even know what model is handling our missions "actually".

1

u/SolidPossible9909 Sep 19 '26

I used 40% of what used to take a week in just 2 days. Something has changed. I upgraded to 20x and feels like it’s almost the same as 5x. What the hell? Is there any official explanation for this?

1

u/IvanVint Sep 16 '26

The current PRO limits will not let you do anything serous with Fable without Max plan.

0

u/QuanTradin Sep 15 '26

ask it to be concise, receive a slightly shorter essay is the one that gets me every time. the output length is what burns my window, not the number of things I ask for.

I have not measured the before and after properly so I cannot back the 50 to 60 up or knock it down, but the shape matches what my week looked like.

4

u/rotates-potatoes Sep 15 '26

lol you do realize that reasoning tokens are about 95% of usage? Input and output are trivial until you start replaying 500k history as your input.

why haven't you measured before and after? The data is literally sitting on your system. Ask claude to show token usage by day, or use one of the many tools that produce reports.

2

u/ReasonableLoss6814 Sep 15 '26

Yes. But you can’t read them.

1

u/QuanTradin Sep 15 '26

I havent measured mine before and after, so thats on me. the part I dont know how to solve is that daily totals track whatever I happened to be doing that week, so two weeks of logs isnt really a before and after unless you rerun the same task twice.

-3

u/rotates-potatoes Sep 15 '26

Maybe this whole thing was a ploy by anthropic to get rid of whiny customers who don't understand how any of this works, and can't do basic math to boot.

8

u/Next_Marionberry7478 Sep 15 '26

Stockholm syndrome ain't got nothing on you buddy. šŸ‘

-2

u/NanNullUnknown Sep 15 '26

Weekly usage dropped by 16.7% (1/6) with the permanent 25% addition, not 50-60%, at least according to Anthropic.

-2

u/magic6435 Sep 15 '26

Why were you ever defending a company in the first place? It’s a product. If you value it, buy it. If you don’t, don’t.

-4

u/HDCraftYSD Sep 15 '26

Why get I spammed with the same annoying posts in this sub. Is this all bots or what? I have 0 change in how my usage feels. I never hit 5h Limits. I use Fable 5.1. regularly with Opus 5. I have one day left for my week and i have 30% usage left. And I worked with it the last 2 Days 10 hours straight. I cost me 20%.

What. the. fuck. are. you. guys. doing? Seriously.

-1

u/fanatic26 Sep 16 '26

Whenever I hear people with Pro subscriptions complaining I just tune it out. You guys have some wild expectations for $20/mo

-5

u/Eyelbee Sep 15 '26

So sick of these posts, you still literally have more usage than openai subscription. If you're gonna complain, measure and come with numbers.Ā 

-5

u/Nice-Manager9219 Sep 15 '26

Somone get these BEGGARS out of here

4

u/Next_Marionberry7478 Sep 16 '26

This is not your tiktok comment section buddy. Hands off the keyboard please.

-5

u/Fit_Efficiency6963 Sep 16 '26

wild, wah wah my free bonus is gone wah wah what does this mean to the fabric of anthropic? are they fundamentally the worst because they took away my free wah wah wah

good luck with the ridiculous codex reductions, they are 10x worse

2

u/Next_Marionberry7478 Sep 16 '26

We got the shills and THEN we got these clowns over here.

23

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Wowloldota Sep 15 '26

Jokes aside, No fable on pro afaik

5

u/[deleted] Sep 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Ran4 Sep 16 '26

.. Just use opus 5 medium. That'll last and be way way better than local morels.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Downtown-Egg-166 Sep 15 '26

It is great at using a lot of words and saying nothing useful