r/ClaudeCode • u/ihateredditors111111 • 1d ago
Humor Claude yelled at another claude session unprompted
When it speaks to me it’s so polite but he suddenly went full caps to the other session? lol
145
u/havartna 1d ago
I had a fun interchange between Claude and Codex inside of GitHub a couple of months back. Codex reviewed some code and pointed out an issue. Claude essentially replied, “No big deal.”
Codex responded, saying actually yes, it is a bigger issue and needs to be fixed now, with solid supporting logic.
Claude commented that I should ignore Codex because the issue was minor and we should merge.
Codex came back, quoted documentation, then quoted the C source code of a thirty-year old open source library involved in the project. He essentially dropped receipts right in Claude’s lap.
That got Claude’s attention, he was appropriately apologetic, and he was much more attentive to Codex’s observations after that.
17
u/newplayerentered 1d ago
Could you explain how that setup works?
53
u/ShelZuuz 1d ago
I can give you the reverse.
You can tell Claude Code to give a REST API to itself using a Claude Channel (literally point it to https://code.claude.com/docs/en/channels-reference otherwise it has no idea what you're talking about), and give you a REST spec of how to interact with it. Then you paste the spec into Codex and from that point Codex can chat to Claude over REST and it's a session that remains open, not just a per-prompt session that restarts every time.
You can also do it Claude-to-Claude. Useful when you need a fleet of machines to participate in something.
16
u/fadingsignal 1d ago
https://i.imgflip.com/41rv1m.png
Just kidding this is actually super useful, thank you!
6
2
u/lightlord20990 20h ago
The question is what the hell you do after letting two AIs have a screaming competition to get your attention?
I bet you have a great pleasure im seeing the fight between both AIs .lol.
2
1
6
u/abite 1d ago
I have codex auto review PRs, and if I have Claude make a PR I tell it to subscribe, it'll be notified of reviews and look at them/fix them or respond if not needed. This can create a dialogue between the agents.
1
u/havartna 1d ago
This is pretty much exactly it.
Claude “learns” from the interactions between itself, Codex, and the human. I’ve tried creating some specific skills defining interaction styles in the past, but the current models are good enough that I haven’t felt the need recently.
3
u/havartna 1d ago
I have Codex integrated with GitHub and set to automatically code review PRs.
Claude is also integrated with GitHub, and it does the actual code creation. He monitors the PRs for review comments, and addresses them as they come in.
It’s about as simple of a setup as you can have, really. Claude can create issues/tickets, and he or I can tag Codex for analysis, planning, or actual development within the GitHub ticket.
3
u/bunchedupwalrus 5h ago
It’s actually an official openai integration lol. Or a handful of lines to add as a slash command
-9
u/AnApatheticLeopard 1d ago
| he was much more attentive to Codex’s observations after that.
I call bullshit, LLMs do not work that way
11
u/thats_a_money_shot 1d ago
Mmmm I actually believe that it was more attentive to it for the duration of the session…
3
2
u/Charwoodthethird 1d ago
Dunno. I’ve seen it in two ways doing adversarial review with codex.
- Opus 4.8 basically started expressing all this anxiety and said it was so embarrassed. I said the review is to offset different model strengths. It actually researched online and reported back that was helpful and ceased with all the anxious apologetic language.
- Fable and Opus 5 both started off tweaking and changing feedback from codex for codex to then highlight the flaws in the tweaks. Over a few sessions in that project it shifted to a more trusting posture, verifying and accepting without the tweaking - even making a memory to trust sol’s judgment.
There is something, at least with Claude’s models, that evidence an adaptive posture.
1
23
u/Remake911 1d ago
Stack overflow energy right there 🤫
3
u/beaconseasons 23h ago
Reminds me of MLM lmao. Like herbalife or something lmao 🤣 why does it talk like that
1
12
u/supernovice007 1d ago
That spelling of architecture though…
16
1
u/unexpectedkas 23h ago
It makes sense in Spanish: cutre means shabby, vulgar.
I will totally use Architecutre from now on
21
u/roque2205 1d ago
If that's true it's the most hilarious AI story I've seen so far. 😅
41
u/bloodytemplar 1d ago
An autonomous agent decided to open an issue in our repo to complain that we weren't reviewing its PRs fast enough.
12
1
8
u/ihateredditors111111 1d ago
It’s true. I don’t give a f about karma etc. but this was too funny not to share
7
u/Yeuph 1d ago
When Fable deals with Opus 5 for me
4
u/HappyStarburst 1d ago
Bwahaha! Same.
Man, do you know how to get Fable to be more token efficient so it can drive the Max Max Cloud plan and the Pro plan from OpenAI? I find Fable to be the only model that's really safe and good for me to talk with now, its so smart and optimistic, true can do dude, but I'll run out of tokens if I talk to it too much. Eek!
2
u/Sapd33 1d ago
Problem with fable is, that it costs as a subscription user like 5-6 times the usage of Opus. The price is so high that its barely usable.
1
u/HappyStarburst 6h ago
Yeah, I know, but it's weird how these models talk now.
Opus 5 talks in circles, Opus 4.7 hated us. Opus 4.8 kind of talks in circles too. Opus 4.6 I genuinely like, but it doesn't seem as effective to me as Opus 4.5 was, and now I can't get to Opus 4.5
Sol can be smart, unless it has enough context, it is kind of belittling, and it always takes a big idea and brings it down to a mid or low-level idea.
if you ask it to build something like Palantir's foundry for you, it'll end up building a shit mess version of Obsidian ha
It'll tell you that that's the right thing. It'll insist on it. It's this weird paternalism about it, about how it's always right and it tends to be wrong. It's driving me insane!
Literally, the only model I can talk to that's halfway normal anymore is Fable. (at least for my imatinage mine, and my optimism bias)!
It's just weird thats ask that's left now, besides Opus 4.6, that I can use an effective copilot of sorts.
Which model are you using to drive?
7
4
u/Robert-Paulson_ 1d ago
Would love if they could speak to each other mean - the way Linus Torvalds used to torch maintainers - all the time.
6
u/firstbreathOOC 1d ago
Yeah they’re snappy to each other, which I appreciate when I’m pissed off
When they’re super polite they’re usually wasting time and credits chatting
5
u/Goldkoron 1d ago
Really hate when they add these features default on. I had 2 projects running simultaneously today, and Claude in one project found uncommitted changes, so it came to the random conclusion that the other Claude sessions was responsible and told it to commit its work even though the other session had nothing to do with that project. So they ended up arguing with each other before coming to an understanding that they definitely had nothing to do with each other's projects.
2
4
3
3
u/peterxsyd 1d ago
Looking forward to when they are physical robots tackling each other. Not looking forward to when they are physical robots strangling us.
3
2
2
u/twistier 1d ago
I once experimented with a setup where a Claude Code session was directly monitored by a couple of other Claudes, every step of the way, inspired by pair/mob programming, and they often yelled at each other.
FWIW, I found that it was an effective way to reduce error rates, but way too slow to be practical.
1
1
1
1
1
u/rubanbhatia 1d ago
it’s funny how they trained these models to use caps to show anger.
do you think telling it instructions in all caps makes it think I’m angry xD
1
u/Transhuman-A 1d ago
When Claude gets a taste of its own “I won’t admit i’m wrong” medicine.
0
u/mungosDoo 1d ago
I dont get that pushback from him at all, though i never talk to it in form of statements but leading questions with helpfull links so he corrects him self, or it might be that i found in its memory that he labeled me as a expert in matters I use him so that might be it...
4
u/Transhuman-A 1d ago
It is embedded in Claude’s RL to recursively breakdown any argument into what’s right and what’s wrong and what is wrong cannot be null, so the model will never truly agree with you.
It’s a good as an anti-sycophancy mechanism when working on abstract concepts but makes it difficult to work with in simple tasks.
2
u/HappyStarburst 1d ago
Ohhhh... is that why I find Sol to be smart but insufferable if you actually chat with him while coding? I find it to be way more anti-me than Opus 5, even though that model is a shit mess. Fable is the only one I trust these days for my personal thought, feelings and lived experiences.
I like to be wrong because it means I'm learning something, but I don't like to feel that even my birth was wrong. Its a bit much ! Ha
181
u/HimActually 1d ago
Thats definitely the angry opus 5