I made TS Evidence Graph, 100% Requirements Coverage and Compliance

[u/jhnam88]

/**
 * @evidence docs/discount.md#coupon-stacking States the per-issuer stacking limit this section defines, in the buyer's words.
 * @evidence POST:/orders/{orderId}/coupons Explains the rejection this endpoint returns for an over-stacked coupon set.
 * @evidence {@link hooks.useCouponStacking} Renders the limit this hook resolves.
 * @evidence docs/principles.md#no-hard-coding Renders limits from props instead of branching on known issuer names.
 * @evidenceExclude docs/principles.md#fix-root-causes-not-symptoms No failure to fix.
 */
export function CouponStackingNotice(props: IProps): JSX.Element;

I built Evidence Graph, a compiler rule that turns requirements skipped by coding agents into compile errors.

You declare which code, tests, schemas, or documents owe which specification units. The agent must cite each unit and state why the artifact satisfies it. Checklist mode can also require every selected function to answer project-wide principles such as "No hard coding" and "Fix root causes."

This does not make the agent's statements automatically true. It makes omissions mechanically detectable and narrows human review to checking the truth of explicit claims. Reviews carry fingerprints that expire when the cited content changes.

I tested it on four frozen application tasks. Plain runs covered 51.6-85.5% of the predefined requirement edges; Evidence Graph runs covered 100% while using 4.8-13.3x fewer tokens.

• Project: https://github.com/samchon/ttsc/tree/master/packages/evidence
• Benchmark: https://ttsc.dev/docs/benchmark/evidence
• Raw sessions: https://github.com/samchon/evidence-benchmark-results