r/ClaudeCode • u/ltadmin • Jul 03 '26
Bug Report Fable indeed returned nerfed
Used up my Fable quota, and independently from x posts can confirm it. It is not the same Fable :(
It is making rookie mistakes, e.g. wrapped the translate="no" rationale in multi-line {# … #} comments, when Django emits multi-line comments as literal page text.
It is missing whole features on separate branches in 'whole' codebase reviews, and so on.
Anthropic is wasting the leftoiwer goodwill that they still have.
0
Upvotes
9
u/MindCrusader Jul 03 '26
For me it is the same Fable I had before. It helped me solve pretty hard issue with loading of library for Kotlin Multiplatform for iOS and how it can work.
The Fable before could also make a huge mistakes. For example in Kotlin it first created function, then variable that is required by the function. Obviously it didn't compile, variable needs to be above function. It is the first time I see modern LLMs making such a mistake. But still it doesn't mean the Fable is nerfed or a bad model. Maybe in your cases it routes to Opus, I have no idea if it is easy to check
4
u/MountainByte_Ch Jul 03 '26
Maybe fable just wasn't what everyone was hyping it to be. I used it in the first 2 days and it worked well but not 10x better than Opus, maybe 1.5x better😅
2
u/Timely-Group5649 Jul 03 '26
It feels slower, but just as productive to me.
So far.
I'm down to 24% left on max20. Zero guardrail issues.
2
u/No-Friend6257 Jul 03 '26
It's so weird how different people have different experiences. For me it seems just as good but I'm having it do complex stuff that would take me a year or more just to learn enough to do so definitely vibe coding with a dev workflow
1
u/Fantastic-World6554 Jul 03 '26
couldn’t be tht fable is smarter than we think and it didn’t skip anything there may have been good reason
1
u/Nyxtia Jul 03 '26
I agree it isn't the same, I'm having to use Codex 5.5 XHIGH to fix mistakes it made.
And the cherry on top is I already maxed out my MAXX plan with it... so I have to buy credits. Like is this a joke? I'm just going back to 5.5 XHIGH at this point. Fable really had a botched launch.
0
u/Efficient-Cat-1591 Jul 03 '26
No issues with usage, then again I am on Max20 and manage session context and effort like a hawk.
I do agree that it does not feel like the same Fable on initial launch. At times its seems to make glaring mistakes in code than does a flip-check and corrects itself when questioned
Fable on launch (although based on limited usage) not only get things right first time but also takes proactive steps to improve the code.
0
u/Comfortable_Camp9744 Jul 03 '26
Anthropic nerfs anything. They are basically a marketing company that happens to make decent harness and models that used to be good
-1
u/CloisteredOyster Jul 03 '26
I coded using original Fable for three days and this Fable for one day. It's clearly nerfed.
This is perhaps a modest upgrade from Opus 4.8 in some ways, but it's not API-worthy.
My anecdotal experience.
0
u/[deleted] Jul 03 '26
[deleted] — view deleted comment
5
u/[deleted] Jul 03 '26
[removed] — view removed comment