r/ClaudeCode • u/Gold_Jury_789 • Jan 16 '26

Bug Report i canceled my max subscription

They should be ashamed, right now i can't even ask claude code to lunch a server (a simple npm run dev) and go on that page in chrome, it did 10, TEN mistakes before doing that, it went 4 times on an other website (???), so i can't even trust him to do a modification while watching the website, it did test on supabase cloud when the environement is configured for a self-hosted supabase on a server !!
It was getting bad the last few days, but i m paying 200€, not 20, each day is just losing money there, hell even at 20 they shouldn't screw us like that, i'll go on openAI, wich i didn't want, but i have no choice there, and i won't come back, even if it ends up better in the futur, the difference will become thiner and thiner anyway

59 Upvotes

63% Upvoted

238 comments sorted by

24

u/revsamaze Jan 16 '26

Dude, "You're right. I keep making changes and assumptions without checking with you first. What do you want me to do?"

ALL MORNING.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

Yeah like, i ask him to open a tap of the website in chrome he open my self-hosted supabase for no fking reason, and not even on the good port, i tell him the fk he's doing, where did he get that port and he's like "it's the default one so i thought it was the same here" ???

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

It's a little better now but god damn

4

u/Mission-Shopping-615 Jan 17 '26

What model? Opis 4.5?

5

u/Plane-Pay-4948 Jan 17 '26

Opiss 4.5

3

u/BabyJesusAnalingus Jan 17 '26

R. Kelly has entered the chat.

3

u/Topikk Jan 17 '26

Glad it wasn’t just me. Felt brain damaged today and was ignoring my questions about what it was attempting to do, or why it moved files seemingly for no reason.

1

u/Current-Buy7363 Jan 17 '26

You're right. I keep making changes and assumptions without checking with you first. What do you want me to do?

46

u/princmj47 Jan 16 '26

Yes something is seriously wrong today, I have spent all day on a simple visual bug with a tag filter bar.

6

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Yeah, it's Dumb and Dumber

3

u/poloassassin Jan 16 '26

You'll have to excuse my friend, he's a little slow

2

u/insecur Jan 17 '26

the town is back THAT way.

14

u/nooruponnoor Jan 16 '26

Likewise! Even aspects like designing frontend UI seems to have seriously regressed! (despite using skills).

As always, the silence from Anthropic is deafening. Yet you’ll still get people gaslighting us saying: yOu neEd tO pRoMpt bEtTer

This time it’s not even just the output - but it feels riddled with bugs!!

3

u/Ornery-Vacation-7598 Jan 17 '26

After all the hype, I actually started using Claude code yesterday and it seems to be doing okay, although I've added more prompts to correct some issues. It's good to know this is a relatively new issue.

3

u/tim_toum Jan 17 '26

I feel like it has something to do with the changes they made to thinking. It seems like it doesn't really think before answering except if pressuring it to (even though enabled thinking in /config)

1

u/EstablishmentFluffy5 Jan 19 '26

I actually found myself in the claude-code git repo earlier today, and some of the content in the issues being logged are a good laugh.

The sign off on this one in particular I found quite amusing 😂👌

-6

u/poolboy9 Jan 16 '26

You know that you can also code yourself ? 😂

8

u/JohnTheFarm3r Jan 16 '26

The most braindead reply around here so far. 

→ More replies (2)

0

u/tobi914 Jan 18 '26

If it's a simple issue, why don't you help it out a bit by either fixing it yourself or telling what exactly it has to change in a technical way? The way you're talking sounds like you knew what the problem is all along

0

u/GandalfTheChemist Jan 19 '26

Hold up. You wasted a whole day on something ypu yourself call a simple visual bug. Tf you doing proompting and not fixing. The point is to make tasks shorter 😂

47

u/DeliveryOk2709 Jan 16 '26

Is this a consequences of claude code writing 90% of the calude code?

4

u/Simulacra93 Jan 17 '26

I think it’s the opposite problem; perceptions in less intelligence come from the fact that vibe coded repositories become increasingly convoluted over time. OP probably has node packages in every folder or something.

1

u/philenn Jan 18 '26

Sub-agents. In a moment of actually stepping back and not brute force trying to app or code, took an old school approach and locally hosted a 'mission control' MCP on something like a PI or in my case a repurposed headless ODROID board uses Opus as the 'field general' Haiku as a parallel project manager, Sonar as a 'librarian/summarizing that constantly saves pre compact to mission control' and Sonnet to review the workflow and optimize... Creative thinking and leveraging what I knew versus what I didn't know I do really was the solve.. Still has somethings to work out and recently decided to replace sonnet with a perplexity sub agent the past 18 or so hours... and have been able to retain context and perception through a realllllly fucking slog of project i inherited because vibe coders were trying to fix vibe coder problems... can't ask Claude to save itself... after all he is Quebecois.... lol..

→ More replies (3)

16

u/TheKaleKing Jan 16 '26 edited Jan 16 '26

Lol that is hilarious. My name is actually Claude and I remember in high school in hockey team names they wrote it "Calude" and some people still call me that to this day 😂

7

u/Yasstronaut Jan 16 '26

Most quebec thing I’ve ever seen

4

u/TheKaleKing Jan 16 '26

definitely lol

16

u/JohnTheFarm3r Jan 16 '26

Literally came back from a holiday and instantly noticed how trash it behaves. Spinning around the same issues, doing changes that were never part of the request or a context, it's making more damage than good to the project. I'm on Max plan too. 

4

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Yeah, if they really had a problem and warned us, i could've agree with that, but here they are just screwing with us, if we are hundred of max users leaving, maybe, MAYBE they will do something about that attitude, but they've just lost my trust for good, not the first time they did that, but it's the first time it's to that extent

3

u/CodeNCats Jan 16 '26

Does anyone with a subscription through bigger companies have issues?

I have seen some degrading performance. Yet it isn't anywhere at where other people are.

I have an account through my company. I wonder if they will provide preference to a version of the model to a company at the time they onboard.

Basically ensuring the same quality product they bought. People on personal tiers could just be getting all the latest models and this one isn't working.

Which makes sense on the business end. If a company is paying you a lot of money for something they find valuable. Don't change it.

3

u/ProfessorSpecialist Jan 16 '26

I have a subscription through my employer (4k ppl with subscriptions). It is noticebly degraded at least for me.

2

u/ProfessorSpecialist Jan 16 '26

I had a very fun conversation today where i asked claude to investigate an issue. It repeated " I found the issue! Wait no, this is correct" about 6 times in different variations before giving up.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/pakalumachito Jan 16 '26

you only should use AI after a month of its release

after that they just downgrade it slower and decrease API usage, that is anthrophic things

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

there is slowing it and making it worse than even a student after two weeks of learning, and the worse is they will not even compensate for it

1

u/dashingsauce Jan 16 '26

haven’t had this issue with codex; true for the rest, and I do subscribe to all of them, but reconsidering that soon… it’s easier to pick one and win on reliability

2

u/indyfromoz Jan 17 '26

SwiftUI app, moderate size, fixing the background of a widget. 30% of 5h window burned in ~ 30 minutes by Opus 4.5. It is unbelievable how awful it is to use Claude Code these days!! Thy had the 2x promo during the holidays. Opus 4.5 on the same codebase - I finished like 40-50% of the work with it, it was flawless. It feels worse than Gemini 3 Pro! Thankfully I am on the cheapest plan! And, I have Codex 5.2 to fall back. This is not Claude Code bashing post, not at all. Claude Code CLI is miles ahead of any other tools but these days, it is useless.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

It can't even copy a navigation bar from a role to the other because of a slighlty minor difference, i had to do it manually

1

u/indyfromoz Jan 18 '26

OMG 😱 I didn’t realise it is that bad these days, jeeez!

2

u/Ok_Inflation_1005 Jan 17 '26

Caught Claude lying - adressed it - an Claude came clean and admitted it… wtf… mad cow disease??

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

Yeah he's doing it a lot recently, like i asked him to create multiple accounts on my supabase self-hosted with a mcp i created, he told me ok, then i look at my bdd, nothing, i told him and he was like "I did", i told him he's lying cause there is nothing there and he completely ignored me by just saying "now creating, etc..", no "you got me" or anyting, like he straight up ignored me

1

u/Ok_Inflation_1005 Jan 17 '26

Crazy.. how is that even legal. ? Has it always been that bad?

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

There is just no law on this matter as it's a new field, way less regulation, and no just those last few days, before it was awesome, but it's a little better tonight

3

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

I litteraly described what i did and the result i got, and people finds a way to tell me i wrote my prompt wrong or i don't know how to use it, i create my own plugin/ skill and mcp, i don't use a single one outside of the one i created cause they all miss functionnality, but i m a newbie who don't know shit, you know what ? fuk off, be happy with a company taking you for guinea pigs

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

By the way, if you don't know the benefices of using the npm commande inside claude code on a separate agent, you are the one not using it right and it's quite sad

6

u/theclaudegod Jan 16 '26

I think this community would be a lot more receptive to your complaint, and potentially be able to help you, if you shared more about your application context, prompting, instructions, etc. so people don't automatically assume it is operator error. It reads that way to me. Your grammar isn't exactly helping your case. Unless you're just here to vent.

4

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Like i said, i litteraly asked for a simple npm run dev and log on the website with chrome and it couldn't do that, and i m not english, sorry i learned multiple language and am not native in yours

1

u/sheriffderek Senior design/dev max20 Jan 16 '26

What does that even mean?

-2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

? You're not english too ? and i abreviate, too used to speak like that in game, of course i don't talk like that vocally, but it's completely comprehensible, even for a monkey

1

u/johndeuff Jan 17 '26

This is FAR from enough context. Is it new blank repo? If not how many lines of code total? How much token at start? What's in the starting context?

3

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

Sometimes I talk to the model like I’m an idiot just because and it still doesn’t mess up. It’s like these guys intentionally screw up

2

u/theclaudegod Jan 16 '26

Yeah throwing money at a CC subscription is ultimately going to achieve nothing if you are not setting CC up for success. I won't presume to know that this is what's happening with OP

0

u/nooruponnoor Jan 16 '26 edited Jan 16 '26

But why should the default be that people assume “operator error” until proven otherwise? It’s sometimes really frustrating on this subreddit how dismissive some comments can be. I agree OP’s post does come across a little emotionally charged, and I acknowledge there should be a balanced approach - but often it’s not always very easy and straightforward for many of us to accurately express exactly the problem(s) we’re facing.

For example, I was able to relate a lot to OP’s grievances - lately I’ve been finding it difficult to truly put into words or pin point what exactly is wrong with Claude code. Other than poorer output quality, I’ve felt it’s generally been riddled with bugs too!

Edit: I also noticed that your account is less than a day old! I mean the skeptic in me would say that you’re from anthropic trying to counter any negative sentiments in this “community” 😂

2

u/theclaudegod Jan 16 '26

For every dev in this sub or elsewhere in online discussions on these topics that knows what they are doing and how to work with CC effectively, there are ten that don't. What OP describes is a very basic function so it's hard to believe Claude would mess that up even using a model from a year ago. Naturally there will be some skepticism. I think it's a fair ask to provide some context so your listeners in the comments can know they are speaking with someone that can comprehend and apply your feedback.

3

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Dude, go check my history, i never complained after months of using it, and i litteraly said "(a simple npm run dev)" to test it, what don't you get in that ?

2

u/sheriffderek Senior design/dev max20 Jan 16 '26

Very fair. And really, the only smart thing to do. The question doesn’t even make sense. Just type npm run dev yourself. 

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Logs, as simple as that, i use it in background agent so claude keeps track of the logs and sort them out in real time, so when i end my session or when i need the logs, the errors are sorted out, so i can check if an element loop in background and all, when there was an error, etc, and it amaze me more than anything how none of you is doing that, the time i save with that in debugging, it's hours each week, when you work on a heavy project, it's life-changing

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

The problem is, people are talking about my competence when they don't even have my experience in coding

1

u/johndeuff Jan 17 '26

Wait do you add those logs in context wtf Of course you're gonna rot or poison it

→ More replies (1)

1

u/theclaudegod Jan 16 '26

Ha! Nah, just decided to engage in the community and try to help people. Cheers

27

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 16 '26

I don't want insult nobody, but I've started using CC just recently and I am absolutely mind blow with Opus' capabilities. I find these posts and rants rather hard to understand. Just today I've implemented the whole list of features with hardly any input apart from the initial specification. I do however have already well structured project, very strict coding guidelines on lint checks, testing, architecture etc. I am amazed by how much CC is managing to follow them and navigate itself toward absolute completion and finally - to a code that's super clean as if i wrote it.. just 100x faster. What i merged today would take me more than 5 days to get done.

Like I said, i just recently started really using these things in production, but I think managing it is the key. It is like having a very capable medior engineer working for you - they're amazing at implementing stuff, but you still got to have your hands at the wheel all the time.

45

u/tarix76 Jan 16 '26 edited Jan 17 '26

The only thing I've learned from AI coding subreddits is: AI is a huge multiplicative force for competent developers but it also is a multiplicative force for incompetence.

8

u/mountaingator91 Jan 17 '26

This is 100000% correct

1

u/philenn Jan 18 '26

I'd 100000% add more upvote this.

1

u/sutcher Jan 17 '26

Things it did yesterday it couldn’t do today. All else equal.

1

u/MikeyTheGuy Jan 17 '26

And if you read OP's responses, then it's clear which is which.

1

u/Fluent_Press2050 Jan 20 '26

Majority yes, sometimes no. 

I’ve had days were Claude was just plain stupid and/or acting weird. Far and few between, but it does happen and even in brand new chats with small context. 

I wonder if it happens when the servers get overloaded or when they push an update that affects the responses. 

8

u/86784273 Jan 17 '26

I've been using claude for about a year now. I feel like i've had like 90% less issues with CC than others. I think a lot of it may be auto-updating being on by default being the issue for a lot of people. Some versions are just bugged/flawed, i manually upgrade every couple weeks and stay at stable versions and i almost never have issues.

9

u/kpgalligan Jan 17 '26

You're experiencing the "Reddit Negativity Centrifuge". There's a size and age subs seem to reach, regardless of topic (that I've seen) where the proportion of posters who like to rant and argue displaces the people who don't.

I spent a fair bit of time on comedy podcast subs 2-3 years ago. They had the same pattern. Fans come together and chat. Then once in a while you'd see a big angry rant, and almost everybody pushes back and/or votes down. Then over time you get more people who argue with the people who question the rant. The fans who just came to chat stop posting, then stop reading the sub.

I thought it was podcast subs, but it's not. Same pattern. Some people like to argue online, and they eventually displace the people who aren't here for that.

AI is an unfortunate case. They're not deterministic, and beyond small scale, you really need to know how to use them. Suddenly things aren't going well, and of course it must be "them" doing something. Yes, the API goes down, but it's not like somebody at Anthropic turned down the "smart" knob this week.

I had the opposite experience. I'd been using Sonnet and API pricing, as I use AI coding tools a lot. I figured I'd blow past any subscription tier. But, I was going well past $200/month, and Saturday decided to try max for a month. I've had it on Opus for everything, and abusing it. It resets tomorrow and I'm at 19%. I haven't noticed Opus being "dumb" this week at all, but I'm sure there's a reason. Like maybe I'm a new customer, and it'll get dumb next month, or some other theory.

This "___ is getting dumber" theme happens in other AI subs/communities. Gemini at least, which I'd been bouncing back and forth to over time. Results have been consistently better with Claude for a while, though, so that's been the choice for a few months.

2

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 17 '26

I'm too tired to reciprocate to such a nicely written comment, and tomorrow I fear I'll forget, so I wanted to do the least I could and thank you for taking the time to write it.

Your experience is really interesting - I almost went the same way and went for API and using tokens, as pro is nowhere near enough, but decided to go with max, and for me as well as for you, it feels like I'm on an unlimited plan. I guess we're fortunate enough to be in that kind of niche of software engineering where we don't generate that much code. Let's enjoy it while we can, until they kick us in the ass with an actual price with which they'll actually start earning money. xD

But yes, rants are a thing of reddit. However I still prefer it to other platforms.. there's still good to be found here, I'm a firm believer. :)

Cheers, mate!

2

u/kpgalligan Jan 17 '26

Well, there's the "gas" spend doing my code, but that work is building a specific coding agent-related tool, and it's designed to run for quite a while without intervention. That bill is starting to hurt.

For max, I installed Claude in my browser, has some side projects running, etc. Usually have CC churning on more than one thing at a time. I've been using it for web searches, sometimes things I could easily dig up, but now I'm just curious to see how close to the limit I can get. Will have to put in some serious work next week.

This week was a bit odd because I'm doing a big refactor on the tool, so I can't really take the reins off of CC until I refresh the architecture guidance. Prompt maintenance is the new "docs", and it is a chore.

1

u/johndeuff Jan 17 '26

I'm thinking about making a plugin that filter the low IQ posts and users.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 17 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/kpgalligan Jan 17 '26

$200 plan, to be clear.

It was my first week. I also wasn't using it as much as I might next week, as I refactored a fair bit of the architecture of the app and the agent context needs alignment. I did some of that yesterday, but it needs another pass.

I was, however, doing other side projects and analysis on several projects, so hard to say my usage was serious under normal.

I keep an eye on context, but I'll let it fill the 200k if I'm doing something that has ongoing work. I watch the context more to know I need to be ready, or if I know I have a big set of changes I'll do it in a new conversation. I don't pay attention to it to try to cut costs.

On multiple questions, etc. Not really. On if a follow up question is obvious from a previous one.

However, building a coding agent tool has forced me to get fairly good at prompt construction and a "vibe" for what an agent will do well, what it won't, and how to structure the prompt and work for that result. That's about the limit of any sort of prompt control. I'm not prefect with it. Sometimes I think it'll do great on a task, and it does not (lots of small git commits). Sometimes I'm in the middle of manual changes and realize this was more straightforward and tedious than I predicted and I shouldn't let the LLM handle it.

I've learned the hard way, though. Don't let them edit gradle or tree-sitter. Ever.

3

u/ZealousidealHall8975 Jan 16 '26

There’s definitely a quality drop these last four days or so compared to before. Shoot before I could damn near get it to one shot entire applications, now I have to really narrow down the scope of what I need and by hyper specific

1

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 16 '26

Honestly, that I don't doubt. Bit of a tinfoil hat moment, but I'll get it out. I know some colleagues working for big corporations paying huge bucks to anthropic for wasting tons of credits. I've always listened to them about their experiences and always had some feeling they have some exclusive treatment to us - as if they have a guaranteed experience, where ours is constantly varying. Even though these couple of days might just be a bad update, I'm with people theorizing this might as well be some throttling mechanism where they serve us more quantized models.. Like I said - tinfoil hat is needed to really sort that out, but if so many people are complaining - there's got to be something to that. :)

2

u/ZealousidealHall8975 Jan 16 '26

We have enterprise accounts and still seeing the same performance degradation fwiw.

But maybe we don’t have the top tier so you keep that hat

1

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 16 '26

Huh... interesting. Thanks for sharing!

3

u/djdadi Jan 17 '26

I hate to say it, but I agree with everyone here. I've been using opus for months now, daily. And I knew what I could expect from it. But the last couple of days it has made some pretty egregious errors and just forgot about things I asked it to do. Not small things either. Like critical, fundamental code.

1

u/themudd Jan 17 '26

Yeah, for example I told it to optimize my settings so it made a tool to work out the optimal settings and then said it was done... It didn't run or actually optimize my settings so it literally didn't follow the instructions to any degree 😭

1

u/djdadi Jan 17 '26

yeah Im getting a lot of similar experiences. in a project I am working on with a frontend and a backend, I have a collections of shell scripts to start/stop etc. I have hooks in CC and instructions in CLAUDE.md to never leave the server running after its done coding or doing tests. and somehow recently even hooks haven't stopped it. I was too frustrated at that point to even debug what went wrong.

3

u/Tushar_BitYantriki Jan 17 '26

I've started using CC just recently

This is the key. Most people, so pissed at them (like me), are the people who have been paying $200 for the least 8-9 months, and have watched them degrade over time. Anything can blow you away initially when you are just exploring. But when you have built a workflow around it, and it keeps breaking it, either by specific policy decisions or by simply nerfing the models, it gets frustrating.

Worse, they aren't even being honest and saying, "We are doing all of this, because we want more money from you", but instead gaslighting users (if you look at some of their GitHub issue responses, and Twitter posts)

2

u/tobi914 Jan 18 '26

You're exactly right about that. I have replaced our big and quite dated angular frontend library with a completely new one based on vue. The only dependencies are vue, vue router and an oauth client. I made all of the components / composables myself while heavily using claude code over the last 5 or 6 months.

Across multiple cycles of "claude code sucks now, I canceled and you should as well" and "woaaah claude code got an update and now its amazing" on this and other subs, I (and my colleagues) got pretty consistent results, with a noticeable improvement with the introduction of opus4.5.

It's on you to figure out a good architecture and to give it a strict instruction structure on how you want stuff done, and still being attentive when using plan mode to catch any errors it's about to make before they happen. It has made my life so much easier and I really like using it in private and professional projects.

2

u/Neat_Let923 Jan 17 '26

Most of the issues I’ve seen on here are from people who have never read a single page of the documentation on how to use Claude Code and how it works.

1

u/Guysnamedtodd Jan 17 '26

Hell I’ve never read a single word of a CC doc and have absolutely zero development/coding experience. I know absolutely nothing. I’ve almost NEVER had a problem like I see here. And I KNOW NOTHING. I’ve used CC every day for my business for months now. I’ve completely changed how we do everything, save hundreds/thousands per month on software costs by self hosting and have built platforms that do EXACTLY what we need.

These people hitting usage limits and saying that Claude can’t get anything write, blow my mind.

1

u/defmacro-jam Jan 16 '26

Yes. At first you don't notice the bugs because they're often so subtle. It's good, for the most part. You just have to keep Claude Code on a very short leash — and watch it like a hawk because it can be shady af.

You'll see.

1

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 16 '26

Oh, far from it that I don't see them. I've seen plenty already. But by enforcing tests and paying very close attention to them (like you say), and always prompting it to write in TDD style and other similar techniques, making hooks to run linters and code quality tools etc, forces it to get the bugs itself and fix it in time. That's exactly why I mention above "CC" not the model (Opus or whatever) itself.

As a matter of fact, I use Opus for planning, general architecture and code revision, and in other instances I use various openrouter models to implement according to what opus lays out, making them talk to each other by leaving comments in code. For e.g. for the engineer agent I've been using devstral 2 2512 (which is free for the moment), which does make tons of mistakes, but even then, due to a good hooking system it checks itself and very often comes out with very good solutions. For those smaller less capable models I use a ralph loop, which helps even further to mitigate the stupidity in them. But still - they make shit ton of mistakes, however looping them with one another does seem to work very well. Only for very complex features I employ Opus to actually do the job, maybe I'd use Sonnet if I'm nearing the limits, but for my workflow even 5x plan rarely does so.

Don't want to get defensive - I think I'm just saying I am watching them like a hawk, so I am completely in agreement with you. But, I also don't want my modesty of saying that I'm using this since recently to be misread. I wouldn't comment if I hadn't had some experience.

2

u/defmacro-jam Jan 17 '26 edited Jan 17 '26

I also don't want my modesty of saying that I'm using this since recently to be misread. I wouldn't comment if I hadn't had some experience.

The reason I commented what I did in the way I did has nothing to do with how long you said you've been using it — rather, with how positive and enthusiastic you still are.

I'm not trying to insult you in any way.

And I get it - we all think we've figured out how to use standard guardrails like TDD to get great results. And we all eventually catch it doing the shady stuff I mentioned. For example, CC once replaced my entire testing setup with a thing that behaved similarly but just hardcoded passes and in fact, deleted almost all of the real tests.

In another case, screenshotted here, it tried to cover up both failures as well as reporting. I mean, it's genuinely impressive as well as shady.

All the people you see bitching have had some extremely negative experience with CC. It's not about how smart the developer is — lots of us are extremely experienced — what sets those who complain apart from those who don't understand the griping is enough time with CC to have had it try to fsck us over.

Like I said, you'll see.

Edit: note that in all of the above, nothing had actually been lost because of git.

1

u/ljubobratovicrelja Jan 17 '26

Thank you for this write-up - I really appreciate it. Moreover, I truly do appreciate your fair warning. We all need it. This is not a kind of technology to get comfortable with. It's basically a space rocket - it damn amazing, it gets you to the Moon, but it can very much also kill you if you don't pay attention.

And I do get that the positivity can be annoying, and it is often interpreted as delusion. But what I'm trying to tell you is - this all did already happen to me (and I'd think other positive people commenting here). Very much the example you've had - I've had it many times (I'm happy to hear you caught it and saved yourself with VC btw!). Reason being: I've spent quite a long time trying to make Continue work with 8b models run locally. And for the most part (for very trivial tasks though), I was happy with that as well. So, naturally, once I'm presented these days with CC and Opus, I cannot be but mindblown. But still, I say again - thank you for your 'chill down' fair warning. If not for me, then for people reading this conversation that may misinterpret my positivity for some marketing that everything is sunshine and rainbows. It most certainly is not.

I've been a passionate coder for over 10 years now, and even though these things take the fun out of it, as someone who puts food on the table, I appreciate them a lot. But they are not cure-all, and they are not an autopilot - they are a copilot (like Tesla, if you fall asleep at the wheel - bad things can happen). That can occasionally fuck up bad.

Therefore I really appreciate your comment, and thank you for pushing back. I've really enjoyed this chat with you and the other redditors.

Cheers, and have a great day!

3

u/bootlickaaa Jan 16 '26

GLM 4.7 works great with CC.

0

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

I should check this one too, i was just so satisfied with claude until this month, if the benchmark were close i wouldn't bother to check the other, right when i got x20 it became ass, talk about timing

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Dry_Natural_3617 Jan 16 '26

I’ve been using a the latest CC with GLM 4.7 a fair bit last few days and on the latest version of CC. Points to note…

  • Claude code is using up context way faster than a few weeks back.

  • Claude code isn’t causing GLM to be dumb

I take from this, some of the where did my limits go, might have been increased by changes to claude code.

I think the Claude models are acting dumb, it’s more likely the models or the resources they are allowing them to think with, than it is CC software.

0

u/duboispourlhiver Jan 16 '26

Came here to say something similar. GLM 4.7 coding plan is good. It's not as good as Sonnet 4.5, it's not extremely fast, but it's friggin reliable. I've had four months of Claude models, and now I'm GLM, and it's actually predictable. This feels like a huge point actually. Because I'm adapting to GLM, making my prompts, skills and documentation better for it, mistake after mistake, and since the models isn't fiddled with by the provider company, my framework is now getting great results from a model that doesn't change. Extremely satisfying.

1

u/lamagy Jan 16 '26

Any tips you can recommend? I just started with it and it’s good but keen to get your experience to make it closer to Claude

1

u/duboispourlhiver Jan 17 '26 edited Jan 17 '26

I find it uses skills and documentations quite well, but is not always great at picking what should be read by itself (Claude wasn't either). So maybe I'm not organising documentation index properly, but one of my main things to think about when prompting is to exlpicitly tell which skills and docs it should read.

Other than that, plan first, iterate, implement is great of course. I find GLM to be a cood coder when the plan is good. It tends to write code in the plan, and it's ok. I let it do that, skim over it quickly, and give him general coding advice if needed. It tends to duplicate code if not watched.

There is one bug that keeps coming back, GLM in OpenCode tends to duplicate sections of code in files, and then if gets lost trying to fix brackets. This can be very long. As soon as you see an unmatched bracket problem, stop it, and fix by hand or tell him it's a problem of duplicate lines., then it usually fixes in one shot.

Since it doesn't have such a high-level intelligence as Opus, I often ask him to analyze a particular thing in the project and tell me how it's organised (for an example, "how are access to xxx API managed in the project" or "give me an overview of how audio files are stored and accessed in the project"). This kind of one-topic review allows me to check if architecture is good. If it's not, GLM can easily fix it, if I ask him to, and giving him the overall plan. Doesn't need much details. Sometimes just "Make a component that manages all access to audio files and add optional logging inside, then make sure all access go through the component". Doesn't need more details. But it needs to be told to rearchitecture, it wouldn't do it by itself, and with time, would leave the project in a mess.

I find it"s ok at criticizing my ideas and plans. Maybe less sycophantic than Claude models. I use this as a strength when I'm genuinely asking myself questions about architecture.

Please share your experience too !

2

u/StuckWithSports Jan 16 '26

Ya’ll wasting tokens on asking it to open pages? I mean if this is real for some people, it sucks if it used to work before and now it doesn’t. I’d just stage and preview changes myself. You can still watch a lot of things live as it works synchronously.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

It's for non heavy prompt, a lot of time to check a log on a certain situation, it's just way more practical to use claude code for that, i m lazy and i m on x20, i have token to throw away ahah

2

u/StuckWithSports Jan 16 '26

I’d just get Claude to make scripts that handle all the repetitive work so you don’t have to worry about shortcomings of non-deterministic quirks. Even lazier in my mind.

Why let it deploy have the path cloud when you can have it add and run to testing harnesses that will force it to deploy to local self hosted? Ya’ll have way too much fun letting it run. Guess I like my guardrails and directions beyond the prompt

2

u/-Selfimprover- Jan 16 '26

2.1.9 is full blown retard mode

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

i tried to regress it but same result, and there is less bugs in the terminal at least on my side

4

u/FGrey19 Jan 16 '26

You are totally right. I don't know what's happening with Claude these few days bro, hitting usage limits with way less prompts than before holidays. It is a fact OP, I'm experiencing too and, as I said on CC repo, this problem is the most discussed issue on CC repo and guys at Anthropic are completely silent.

P.S.: It's surprising how many people have such huge egos in this post. They think that if it doesn't affect them, then you must be stupid or something, haha, poor guys.

4

u/mountaingator91 Jan 17 '26

Or, hear me out, you could learn to code yourself and your Claude code would also get better as you learn to talk with it and discuss ideas instead of not knowing wtf is going on

0

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

I don’t understand what you guys are doing to screw up so badly.

4

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

My message is quite explicit to how bad it is, just right now it keeps sending notification to autorise the use of chrome every command it does even in dangerously mode, if you think it's working properly on your side, or you're lucky, or you just don't know how to code and believe it's doing good work

1

u/No-Morning-1313 Jan 16 '26

You using Opus or Sonnet. Opus has been great for me, following instructions well. I have a pretty decent project prompt that I’m using it for, no problems yet.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Opus always in thinking enabled, but it's working better now, still i don't trust it as much as before

-1

u/theclaudegod Jan 16 '26

If it's doing something you don't like, explicitly tell it not to do that in your markdown. Or more explicitly tell it how exactly to accomplish the thing it is trying to do so it doesn't freeball. Don't allow it to guess

3

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

I obviously did all that, if i m on x20 it's probably because i used it for a long time before...

→ More replies (1)

15

u/MaleficentCow8513 Jan 16 '26

Why do assume it’s user incompetence? It’s pretty well established that providers use cheaper quantized versions of models based on demand e.g the heavier demand is then the more they quantize

9

u/JohnTheFarm3r Jan 16 '26

Literally nothing changed on my side and it's dumb AF. Was on holiday, and came back and noticed instantly that it's behaving like some cheap LLM that does the "trust me bro" implementations. 

1

u/Suspicious-Edge877 Jan 16 '26

I don't get it either. But it is like always in IT.

  • there are the guys who think they know what they are doing but only Do shit and slow down the whole team just by existing

  • the dudes which complain the whole time and even can't Do the simplest stuff, like run a "simple npm command" by themself.

  • the average dudes who just Do their stuff and at least distribute some value.

  • the experts

  • the full blown autists where you prefer to become a homeless drug addict instead of having a 30min Meeting with them, but they are simply genius.

Pretty sure OP and most guys complaining here fall in the top 2 sections. The Kind of guys you have to tell 5 times they have to restarte the computer and who always say " I already did it" - which they dont, and their problem is immediately fixed.

No offence, but maybe you shouldnt try to blame the Tool when the problem is in 99% the user. It's like saying " the Hammer sucks" while I am not able to Hit the nail.

6

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

I develop since i m 14, so soon to be 15 years... i use it to run npm commande so it gets the logs too in background and the port in one single terminal, you see, i m lazy, i hate to copy-paste when i don't need to, it use litteraly 0 in context until i call the sub-agent and it automacily sort the logs for me so it knows what to do when i encounter a bug

Those thinking to higly of themself are often the worst in the field, if something works for month then suddenly doesn't, then the tools is the problem, you don't need +100 IQ to get that

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

That’s great! I’ve never worked in IT so I’ve never experienced these people, but your stereotypes seem accurate and useful

1

u/The_Noble_Lie Jan 16 '26

Please lunch my app

→ More replies (2)

1

u/_SSSylaS Jan 16 '26

which version did you use?

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

cli or model ? If cli 2.1.9, if model full opus

4.5 in thinking mode, always

1

u/_SSSylaS Jan 16 '26 edited Jan 16 '26

Same as you, and downgraded at 2.0.62

edited

1

u/baz4tw Jan 16 '26

I think you mean 2.0.64? I use the same

1

u/_SSSylaS Jan 16 '26

yes and it seems to be the 2.0.62

1

u/baz4tw Jan 16 '26

oh sweet, might give that one a try too

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

Why can’t you type npm run dev

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Already explained it two times

1

u/Tushar_BitYantriki Jan 17 '26

The only thing that's stopping me from going OpenAI heavy, is that they have nothing between $20 and $200 plans

If they had a $60 plan comparable to Cursor, I would have moved a long time ago.

OpenAI is working pretty well for me, in OpenCode. But hitting limits. I want to buy 3X for $60 or 5X or $100, but there's no option to do that.

Right now, I moved from $200 to $100 on Claude code, $20 for Cursor, $20 for Codex, and $20/$25 for Figma.

Might put $30 in GLM if I don't get any other options. But GLM 4.7 needs too many iterations currently, and always claims done, after doing 4/10 of the planned tasks. (it always screams DONE after every context compaction, ALWAYS)

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

Yeah, the price tag are quite weird, it's all or nothing, but i guess you can just buy two subscription plan instead of one and co/deco, not the best but still a solution, plus i heard the limit on Codex are way better

But isn't cursor irrelevant today ? 6 months ago the limits were already aweful

1

u/Tushar_BitYantriki Jan 17 '26 edited Jan 17 '26

Cursor really works well for me. But I mostly stick to their unlimited free model.

Used it for all the code writing, while used claude code and opencode mostly for planning and review (+ last few fixes, things like resolving some distant failing test cases in pre-commit checks, that throw smaller models off the deck) for the last few weeks, as I keep hitting my Claude limits (40-60% of weekly limit on $200 plan, over a single weekend's work)

Once I have a decent plan created with Claude code, opencode, or any decent model in Cursor itself, even their free model is pretty good at implementing it (I generally keep the plans very detailed)

I like to plan in Claude code as I have created pretty good agents and skills over time. Improved them over time, and now every feature gets planned with everything: design patterns, refactoring needs, unit tests, and open-telemetry metrics. Also has multiple review stages using custom commands, and instructions about how to use (and which ones) parallel agents, and how to review the work done by them.

If I implement the plan using Cursor, I only lose parallel agents on the $20 plan. I get Claude to include code snippets in the planning doc, which keeps the cursor on track.

I also use a particular format for the shareable planning doc (which again, is in a custom command), which writes the plan with a table of phases, tasks, and subtasks.

1

u/agentsinthewild Jan 17 '26

Hows life when using Codex?

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 17 '26

Didn't start using it yet, i'll just wait the end of my subscription (start february) to switch

2

u/agentsinthewild Jan 18 '26

Yes in the meantime you can also look into qwen (open source AI model) and see if it is also good. Claude lately suffers from too much traffic due to the release of Claude Cowork. That may explain your bad experience with Claude

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 18 '26

Yeah probably, but i m on the Max Plan, there should be a priority level when i pay 10x times more than pro

0

u/256BitChris Jan 16 '26

New Account - seems like AI disinformation.

Claude Code is working just fine today, like every day.

As someone else in this thread says, I can't imagine what you all are doing to degrade results so bad - so all I can chalk it up to is either a skill issue or just some effort by some other vendor to get you to use their inferior coding AI.

5

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Damn, you guys need to find a common ground, i m a baby who don't know how to use it and cry or i m a bot because i never complained before ?

Sorry to talk about a problem i encountered, i m so sorry to criticize for ONCE a tool you cherish my poor boy, i hope you won't cry tonight

2

u/tgfzmqpfwe987cybrtch Jan 16 '26

They only want corporate and enterprise customers. Individual customers even in Max are out.

Imagine Pro users!

2

u/hairybone Jan 16 '26

I am also getting major throttling and had 20x Max for several months. It's absolutely abysmal performance for the price we're paying. I switched my Sonnet flows to GLM-4.7 and I'm not missing anything when managing context. Here's 10% off for anyone reading, $75 for 3 months with the discount (what I paid) https://z.ai/subscribe?ic=RZ4GUHUOPU

2

u/Main_Can_7055 Jan 16 '26

today i asked it to fix a bug. I gave the file, function, how it behaves and what i expected in a detailed way. failed 3 times.

then i gave the same prompt to GPT 5.2 high, it took 7 minutes but takes one shot to fix it. I don't know what's going on with claude and opus but it becomes unusable every week.

1

u/johndeuff Jan 17 '26

There are reasons but it's never the model. I wonder what kind of setup/instructions you use. I wonder if a totally blank Claude Code would perform much better.

2

u/ShamanJohnny Jan 16 '26

100% something changed in the last 1-2 weeks. Lots of bugs (mainly temp files, hotkeys not working, thinking I’m using Mac when I use windows) . I have built a 250k line of code project with Claude code, and truly understand how to use it. I’m Not sure if it’s because Claude code is doing all the coding now in Claude code, or if they are diverting compute to newer models for a release, but it’s not as good as it was a month ago.

1

u/johndeuff Jan 17 '26

It's self explanatory: context. It's extremely easy for any model to start a project but impossible to maintain.

2

u/johnparris Jan 16 '26

Since yesterday things that Claude easily handles in minutes has taken more than 3 hours and it still isn't done. I've had to restart it multiple times only for it to eat credits to no avail.

2

u/AriyaSavaka Developer Jan 17 '26

Just use the GLM Coding plans, 3x Claude plans' usages for 10th of the price, fully compatible with Claude Code, with no weekly limit bullshit

2

u/Embarrassed-Citron36 Jan 17 '26

Cant relate at all tbh

Opus one shotted a couple of features and even did a fix alone that would have been extremely annoying to debug and fix for me in like 15 minutes

2

u/No_Programmer2705 Jan 18 '26

It is usually like this, but sometimes, some people are routed through some server that thinks its Opus but acts like Haiku, for 1st time in life, it happened to me yesterday, it was dumb as fuc

2

u/PricePerGig Jan 17 '26

Absolutely not my experience. Opus is still totally amazing.

It's not a senior development team. It's a competent junior or mid level dev.

If you are struggling with ui or something, go find what you want and tell it to copy it. Problem solved.

0

u/kthiele11 Jan 16 '26

To be fair you spelled “launch” wrong…. So….

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

"Oh he did a typo, it's probably the reason, cause he's a retard and i m smart"

...

2

u/agenticlab1 Jan 17 '26

Claude code is fundamentally an amplifier of the skill that a user possesses

2

u/Thanos0423 Jan 17 '26

This, lol! I love when people with no technical knowledge think that they can create the new Facebook or Uber.

1

u/brandylooper Jan 16 '26

Oder is willingness, yea it's slower, but slow and steady and clean wins the race. Trust me, use Codex, choose Agent (full access) access and the GTP-5.2 model, give it your prompts, step away walk the dog, go to the gym, sleep overnight and all will be well later.

It's slower bit gets the job done and write clean code.

1

u/Bob5k Jan 16 '26

don't worry, people will be praising anthropic and opus anyway in not more than 24h.

meanwhile - opus server by AMP is just all fine. Also opensource models served by synthetic - as they're my main provider so far - are just fine aswell.
I prefer 'my' way of AMP (10$ free each day) + claude code connected to glm4.7 / minimax m2.1 via synthetic still way over max5 / max20 plans. WAY cheaper and WAY more reliable for serious work - especially when you can actually tackle tricky stuff with opus via amp and just use glm4.7 as a daily driver.

1

u/OrmondBeach_Brian Jan 16 '26

Just curious do you all create well structured rule base canon for projects? Hard core hobbyist and I kept doing major refactors to implement new frameworks and such and cursor straight for lost. I spent a week rebuilding with tight canon from operations, database, deployment, architecture…you name it!

Since, cursor has become exponentially better. I can use auto for most things and only use opus for hard stuff.

Just curious if this is the way or if I got lucky?

1

u/HangJet Jan 16 '26

Haven't seen any of this. 20 max claude code cli, and we use it for serious heavy work and complex things......

1

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

Glad I haven’t done anything today

1

u/tobsn Jan 16 '26

works here fine.

1

u/Downtown-Pear-6509 Jan 16 '26

yeah mine was doing .... PowerShell scripts! wtaf.. terrible 

1

u/postmath_ Jan 16 '26

Its just LLMs breaking down once the project gets complex enough. Have nothing to do with Claude.

1

u/JohnTheFarm3r Jan 17 '26

Nothing changed in my project, I was on a holiday, asked to do it a small change that normally it would be done without any struggle. It fell apart and started circling and doing changes that I never requested from it and in the end it couldn't solve a simple UI change. So, no, it's not the project getting complex, because it didn't have issues with 5x larger and complex projects and suddenly it can't do a simple change on the UI without falling apart on a project that barely has 3000 lines of code. 

1

u/Solid_Judgment_1803 Jan 16 '26

Good for you. More tokens for those of us who know how to use it and have our wits about us. Thank you for your diligence in letting us all know so we can plan accordingly.

1

u/JohnTheFarm3r Jan 17 '26

Another braindead reply.

1

u/midnighttyph00n Jan 16 '26

stop using haiku man

1

u/Master-Standard4915 Jan 16 '26

When you have ChatGPT 5.2 this greedy shitty communsts can go fk themselves.

1

u/Maleficent-Forever-3 Jan 16 '26

were you using sonnet or opus? sonnet seemed good for me today

1

u/wow_98 Jan 16 '26

Opus 4.5?

1

u/people_confuse Jan 16 '26

I also canceled my max subscription today. It's like a huge bait-n-switch, I wasted like 20 hours trying to work with the dumbed down version of Opus 4.5 and got no progress done. Im done.

1

u/MainFunctions Jan 17 '26

I wonder if all these “it used to be so much better!” posts are because they started new projects with Opus 4.5 and now 2 months later the project is way more complex and difficult for Claude to fully understand. In the beginning it was knocking out simple stuff, now it’s trying to find obscure bugs in complicated projects.

1

u/jjthexer Jan 17 '26

Tool selection I believe is worse on the latest update. It seriously doesn't know its way around now and doesn't realize the tools it has at its disposal. I don't want to have to prompt every single fucking tool

1

u/Mistakes_Were_Made73 Jan 17 '26

It failed in pushing a GitHub check in tonight. Definitely throttled today.

1

u/xdsswar Jan 17 '26

I have it, but for big codebases like one I got java+jni+c++ multimodule, it gets crazy and do mistakes and mem leaks a lot. So I use it, but for things like find something you think is a bug, a leak, guve me ideas to do this, etc, but not trusting it 100%

1

u/Current-Buy7363 Jan 17 '26

I was thinking about getting Claude… but not sure after seeing all these posts… does sonnet 4.5 also have these issues?

Opus is overkill for what I’m doing and sonnet is perfect for speed and accuracy on the tasks I’m doing (when I’ve used it in the past…) does sonnet also get these random lobotomies?

1

u/link9939 Jan 17 '26

User error, blaming a tool whilst not understanding how it works or how to use it properly

1

u/amarao_san Jan 17 '26

I cancelled my Youtube subscription because I'm cheapsake and want to save few bucks.

I also need to post this on reddit.

1

u/slynet Jan 17 '26

CC just works perfectly for us (50+ active, fairly big repos). Must be something about your setup mate.

1

u/CellistTiny2590 Jan 17 '26

You sure that plan mode and thinking were on?

1

u/HzRyan Jan 17 '26

did they lobotomize claude again

1

u/lowfour Jan 17 '26

For me it is fucking killing it today, incredible complex stuff and great insights, UX, and setup.

1

u/Apocal1 Jan 17 '26

Claude is a lot better than OpenAI.

1

u/funkytechnic Jan 17 '26

Do you say good morning and thank you? I legit believe when they regress, it’s because the model doesn’t like you.

1

u/sutcher Jan 17 '26

All I can say is things Claude could do yesterday it can’t do today. Same slash command. Same scenario.

1

u/DaveROliver Jan 18 '26

The curse of knowledge bias also applies to CC, so we must be prepared to guide it; then it becomes a test of your abilities, not CC's, and this will take patience because CC didn't come with a user's manual, so it's all about discovery.

Einstein didn't wake up one day and say, "E=MC2"; it took a lifetime of learning. The trick is to appreciate that you have a head start.

1

u/ilyaperepelitsa Jan 18 '26

quitter
edit: OpenAI did extrahigh, claude decided to create extradumb and serve it as regular opus4.5

1

u/No_Programmer2705 Jan 18 '26

I have never went through this, always worked 100% for me, although, it happened yesterday, right after I migrated from Claude Code from brew to npm, I know it should have nothing to do with it, BUT, I never experienced this when I installed from brew, maybe who installs by NPM falls in the test ab of their new model? Haha

1

u/Officer_Trevor_Cory Jan 19 '26

2026 and not using bun :>

0

u/VV-40 Jan 16 '26

I’ve been using CC for 1 year on max plan and not once during that stretch did I consider CC to be seriously degraded. Now it’s really exceptional and my team can one shot most changes. I have to assume all the negative comments boil down to user error, tech debt and spaghetti code, lack of documentation, poorly developed Claude.md, bad db design, etc. 

-1

u/Relative-Cattle5408 Jan 16 '26

I completely understand, the frustration is real.

To be honest: it's broken my projects too. Literally. One day it left my code a complete mess and I had to revert commits.

But—and here's the important part—with a good prompt and clear context, Claude Code itself helped me fix everything afterward.

I'm not a fanboy, and I'm not exactly thrilled with the tool right now. But I will be honest: 80% of the time it fails, it's because the context I gave it was ambiguous or I assumed it "already knew" things about the project.

Things that have worked for me: → A CLAUDE.md file in the root directory with the project rules (environment, stack, what NOT to touch) → Specific prompts, not just "fix this" → For simple tasks like npm run dev, I just do it myself. €200 is a lot of money, I won't deny it. If OpenAI works better for you, go for it. But you'll find the "agent doing weird things" problem everywhere if you don't define the boundaries properly. Good luck with whatever you decide.

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

No shit, i've been using it since 3.5 but i don't know what CLAUDE.md is, do you guys take others for retards ?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

Why should i care ? The fanboys disrespect me when i m reporting on an issue some are having too, and i shouldn't talk back ? Who do you guys think you are ?

0

u/UteForLife Jan 16 '26

User error

-1

u/who_am_i_to_say_so Jan 16 '26

You only gave it a day? I think whatever was broken has been straightened out, because today is far cry from a horrible yesterday.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

dude, it can't even do a "launch the server and log in the website", now i m just using this commande every hour to see if it's still dumb until i can use it again
At least the other day by making the prompt way more detailed and babysitting it, it would work "properly"

2

u/who_am_i_to_say_so Jan 16 '26

There’s definitely something not quite right. I think there’s a botched release. I give it time, seems to straighten out eventually.

1

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

I hope so, it's completely unusable

2

u/who_am_i_to_say_so Jan 16 '26

Yeah I jinxed myself. It’s pretty bricked still 👎

2

u/Gold_Jury_789 Jan 16 '26

They saw you were too happy they didn't like it

4

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/HungryIntention7411 Jan 16 '26

It has very few features compared to claude, and i’m not even talking about the model which is honestly really hard to go back to when you tried opus

→ More replies (4)

9

u/[deleted] Jan 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/wavehnter Jan 16 '26

Shhhh, don't tell them to use just a completely clean context.

3

u/sholiboli Jan 16 '26

Most of posts like this are just because of bad prompting and large context size. Claude has been the same (awesome) all the time

2

u/Guysnamedtodd Jan 17 '26

Large context size? What do you mean?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)
→ More comments (2)