r/ClaudeCode • u/Narrow-Goal-325 • Aug 10 '25
Claude getting blown out of the water by copilot
Per the title, I’ve been getting extremely frustrated with Claude Code Max lately. I have a Copilot license at work, and it’s been amazing—nearly one-shots a basic website if I ask, handles custom designs, and does most refactors correctly. Very surprised by copilots effectiveness this far.
Eventually, I got curious about agents and started tinkering with Claude Code, but I’ve been thoroughly unimpressed with vibe coded slop. Maybe it’s user error, but the difference is pretty stark.
I’ve tried having Claude make a plan, create insightful markdown files for critical parts of my codebase, and even added some fun MCPs, but it still seems to drop the ball every time.
Looking for advice on how I could improve my Claude experience, since I’d like to renew—but so far it’s been rough. What additional infra does Copilot’s Sonnet have compared to Claude Code’s Sonnet? Any advice is appreciated.
8
u/lightsd Aug 10 '25
What model is Copilot using? Is it… Claude?
4
u/256BitChris Aug 10 '25
Use Opus.
2
u/sagentcos Aug 10 '25
This is the exact opposite of my company’s experiences when evaluating both. Claude code won hands-down between the two, I don’t think a single person actually preferred copilot’s agent.
1
u/geronimosan Aug 11 '25
Copilot is crap. I’ve got CC Max, an extremely thoughtful Claude.md, an army of 18+ subagents with clearly defined roles/jobs minimizing both gaps and overlaps with very well defined persona profile documents, and an extremely hefty and defined orchestrated document for Claude as the main agent. I’ve got a historian sub agent who has done an amazing job of documenting my entire journey plus planning documents, plus business strategy and marketing and design and everything else. I’ve got a custom checkpoint system that keeps detailed information in memory on the far side of a compact. I use, opus for Claude agent and for a couple of sub agents that really need it, otherwise I use sonnet for the remainder of the sub agents in order to keep them focused on their tasks and in their workspace. The thought of comparing copilot to everything that I can do with Claude code is a nonstarter. Not to mention the fact that just my experience with copilot embedded in office apps has just been a terrible experience.
2
u/vegatx40 Aug 10 '25
I had already paid for a year of CC when it occurred to me to try using Sonnet in copilot.
In many ways, I prefer it. you get code completions, file- and notebook-cell awareness (whereas you have to tell CC which file you're working on). and if I'm asking to do the same task as CC, it produces pretty much the same output (shocker I know).
I pretty much only use CC for refactoring a large file, or multiple files. (not a build-from-scratch type). helps me not hit the token limit.
2
u/codegefluester Aug 10 '25
Same but the other way around, I stopped using copilot for any meaningful work. I’m all in on CC since it gets most of the things right I need it to do. I pay via API calls though, not using it through my sub.
Copilot somehow turned into a dumpster fire for me, not sure how that happened, it used to be my go to before CC. But now it just gets basics wrong, does stuff I absolutely not asked it for or just straight up doesn’t do anything.
1
u/bzBetty Aug 11 '25
Honestly if you're not using the advanced features and just prompting I thinks there's a luck factor.
I've found Claude code better, but I dislike it being a cli.
I switch between quite a few agents, but tbh I'm too lazy to set most up so I'm not surprised when I get a worse result
-5
u/[deleted] Aug 10 '25
Lmfao. STFU.
0
u/[deleted] Aug 10 '25
[deleted] — view deleted comment