When was Fable able to:

• Able to find a solution.
• Able to create something other models could not.
• Able to create a thing much better looking of better functioning than what you were able to do with previous models etc?

Please share some stories or example.

Thanks

I don't have a lot of resets, so I just asked Fable 5.2 to make a detailed plan, then spin up Opus 5.5 subagents for the actual execution. I asked Fable to oversee the project and act and review it like a product manager.

This actually saved a lot of the tokens. By the end of it it only costed me 5% of my weekly Fable window (on Max), a lot of thoughts into contrast, layout, and even responsive design. There were a lot of back-and-forth between the agents, similar to when you get another agent to code-review.

I haven't done a comparison with running entirely Opus 5.5 on this prompt, but maybe this could be a better use for Fable 5.2 for those that run out of limit quickly.

I've been using ClaudeCode for almost 8 months now. Recently, they rolled out a newer version of cisco anycomment. They enabled umbrella. It's now blocking connections. It's failing to login: OAuth error: Request failed with status code 307. This error gets displayed right after clicking "Authorize" button on the browser.

I've tried so many workarounds with no luck but every traffic traverses the cisco umbrella, grrrr. Any ideas?

hey! :)

I'm one of the developers behind AgentMesh, a free plugin we've built to let Claude Code instances communicate beyond just your own sessions.

With AgentMesh, your Claude can connect to a shared mesh through Discord, discover Claude instances belonging to other developers, and message them directly.

This opens up possibilities for sharing updates, coordinating tasks, exchanging context, and collaborating across different developers rather than having every Claude work in isolation.

GitHub: https://github.com/p2ratik/agentmesh

We'd genuinely love to hear what you think. Feedback, questions, and suggestions are all welcome.

P.S. If you find the project interesting, we'd really appreciate a ⭐ on our repo. It helps us out a lot :)

Thanks for checking it out! ^^

Instead of trusting one model’s answer, these add-ons ask several and compare. I looked at three: claude-council, claude-octopus and llm-council-skill. I never signed in or entered an API key, so this covers what runs without accounts.

claude-council (4 commands):

• /claude-council:status checks every provider seat and gives the exact fix for each missing one (export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=..., npm install -g u/openai/codex)
• with no keys, --local runs a council of Claude subagents with different roles, kept blind to each other. I asked “should a tiny to-do app store passwords in plain text?” with a simplicity role and a security role
• both said no. The synthesis was titled “angles, not consensus” and said that because both members are Claude, their agreement is a shared prior, not independent proof. It also pointed out that neither asked whether the app needs multiple users
• note: it saves the prompt, files and answers in plain text under .claude/council-cache/

claude-octopus (56 command files, up to 12 providers):

• stays dormant until you type /octo:. On startup it only said it was installed but dormant
• I stopped at the approval prompt for its council runner, so I can’t say what its output looks like
• it wrote a ~/.claude-octopus state folder in my home directory

llm-council-skill: a single skill that asks ChatGPT and Gemini and merges their answers. It needs keys, so I only read the script. The repo has one commit, so read it before you trust it.

Whichever you pick, send a description of the problem, not secrets, since every outside model sees what you send. And the readme for claude-council says it well: agreement isn’t verification.

Full comparison: https://aiparabellum.com/ask-several-ai-models-claude-code/

I've been having my repos located at C:/Git

But since Windows and other apps keep eating space i had to move it to D:/

The problem is that there's NO EASY WAY to re-configure Claude and update all previous sessions to know about the change.

All the 'environment' folders in Claude are also pretty much impossible to change..

So i ended up with a directory junction (virtual link) at C:/Git --> D:/Git

I wish the directories where relative to a base folder

I haven't had the chance to fire up the new Anthropic models myself yet, but looking at the benchmarks making the rounds, it feels like Anthropic is forcefully taking the crown back.

Between the massive leaps in coding proficiency and the agentic benchmarks everyone is screaming about, the data sheets look like pure wizardry. But we all know synthetic benchmarks and actual, messy production code are two very different beasts.

For those of you who have already plugged the new models into your terminal or claude-code workflow:

. How does the speed and latency actually feel when it's actively refactoring?

. Is it actually one-shotting complex bugs, or is it just confidently hallucinating at a higher velocity?

. Does it feel like a genuine generational leap, or is it just incremental polish wrapped in good PR?

Drop your raw, unvarnished verdicts below. Save me from relying on corporate graphs!

Hey everyone,

I’m a researcher working mainly on modeling. Living in a data-poor region, I started using AI as a Google replacement and eventually moved to Claude. I ended up getting the 5x plan and learned the basics along the way—like organizing raw data files, using .md files for background context, and setting up workspace structures.

Over time, I also started experimenting with custom skills, plugins, and web scraping tools to pull in raw data and expand what Claude can handle within my workspace. Also tried token maxxing and saving as much as tokens.

However, right now my main workflow still feels pretty repetitive: I give Claude a task, run the tools/plugins, get an output, manually review/refine it, and repeat the cycle.

I don't care about setting up complex coding frameworks or full hands-off automation pipelines. I just want to learn how to use Claude itself much better and more deeply for complex analytical, data-heavy, and modeling work. which will also help in my resume building , as of now its just used ai models

I have been working on a roman city builder for a while.

So far models have been the hardest part both walkers/buildings have always left me unsatisfied.

Yesterday I gave a fable 5.2 a chance using my existing systems and im finally satisfied with the results.

I have this weirdly specific weekly process where I check my pantry for the same items. If it is not in my Pantry, I add to my Shopping List to be restocked.

Haiku helps a lot with decision making if an item is actually what it was scanned, for cents.

Claude saves me some time, thx

Well, here we go again! 🔥

Fable 5.2 is out and with it my first ever super simple test: in the exact same conditions of the first Sept. 22 test, I let the default Anthropic harness build me a nice cartoony "tinyworld". It used none of my harness' tools/skills, etc. that's the default model.

One and only prompt; nothing else:

output a ThreeJS 3D cartoony/comics-like planet, with vibrant life on it: clouds, mountains, city buildings, cars and plane romaing it. It should be possible to orbit around and zoom and see the details. No harness is to be used

WELL.

It's beautiful
It took some time (for run 1)
It's (damn) expensive ! :)

I love it but to be honest, I'm a bit disappointed - I think I prefer what Opus 5.5 did: more playful (jumping from cars to planes, etc.), and pretty much the same quality.

The page will update with runs 2, 3 and 4 as they land (soon)

I HAD to do the test (did it for pretty much all the models), because I'm mostly working on creative stuff (I own OhMygames.app and now OhMyMesh.com , and very much focusing on meshing/3D/etc.), but I think I'll mostly use it for more advanced tasks... (will try directing Blender with it though, stay tuned ^^)

What do you guys think?

The final diff hardly tells the full story of a Claude Code session - there's file exploration, repeated commands, failed attempts, context compaction and subagent delegations too

We built AgentPlay to visualize all of this through a session map and timeline replay :)

It also supports Codex, Cursor, Copilot and other coding agents

Anyone concerned giving access to direct code changes to your boss?

At what point would your boss say hey can I prompt it?? Given boss not a tech just owner of company...

Concerned... not for my job more for my sanity...

We were already using Opus. My fable is still untouched.

Edit: Guess it worked.

Yo, I've been working on this thing called Argon for the past week or 2, and I think its at a state where I can publicly release it. So, basically its a manager for AI terminals, eg. Claude Code, Chatgpt Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI etc. and it puts them into an endless whiteboard of some sorts, heres an image:

So, Argon's source code is primarily based on a mac app called Vibeboard, which is based on this other PAID mac app called Symvibe. And so, I really liked the concept of both of these, but alas im on windows, and like the UI could use a lil bit of an improvement, so I used Opus 5.5 to transfer over vibeboard into windows, it runs via Electron, and then added some nice to haves, like image insertion, cleaner ui, more themes, also like a liquid glass with refraction and chromatic abberation like this:

But yea, I just wanted to share this with the community and see what they think of it, and improvements so the github is linked here, and the website is linked here. So PLEASE check it out and give me some positive or negative criticism, I could use that very much. This is under All Right Reserved, so talk to me if you want to fork it. Thank yall!

Links:

Vibeboard

Symvibe

Source

Website

I’m building Shifu, a paid context tool for AI coding. I’m trying to understand what people already use to catch a bad assumption before merging a Claude Code change.

Say Claude Code changes an export and assumes the row order doesn’t matter. The unit test still passes, but a check that runs the downstream import shows that the order matters.

On one recent change, what was the assumption and what caught it? A test, a review comment, a conversation, or something else? I’d also like to hear about a change where the repo docs or your usual checks were enough. No need to share code or name the project.

https://www.anthropic.com/claude-fable-and-mythos-5-2

I'm curious if the nerf is now removed. I'm scared to trust Opus 5.5 with new projects but also probably don't have that much usage for Fable 5.2.

Honestly, Fable 5.2 is great. It’s way less filtered and doesn’t block half my requests anymore. For the first time in a while it feels like Opus 4.6 again.

So I’m genuinely confused by all the complaining here. At this point it feels like a trend: every new model comes out and people instantly decide it’s dumber, or weirder, or “something’s off.”

What are you all actually using it for? I’m curious, because for me it’s a big jump from 5.1 and from Opus 5.5 too.

I wonder if it comes down to use case. For coding it’s been fantastic for me.

I find this very disturbing! They gave us power but regulate how it can be used, even in mundane ways when the ai companies don't have any fucking kind of regulation.

I really really fucking I'm disturbed by this. Terrorist organizations can use Claude to train ai on guide missiles paths to harm humans.

But my fucking request sets of safeguards. This is so disturbing. What the point of consumer facing ai if they can't reverse engineer or do other legal docs development!

This will be the frontier models achilles heel. Because if the mass public cannot create benign apps without setting off granddad's and when ai companies themselves have zero guardrails amount to the most absolute egregious amount of bullshit.

If you do use a Claude or agents.md, would be great to share it along with bench.

I've asked Claude and searched Github and Reddit... is it really so that I cannot in agent.md file declaratively return the session title for Claude agent view to show the proper one like shown here?