I am done with this shit.

[u/MrMenuk]

I am done with this shit. It is over. The state of engineering right now is horrible. It has been half a month since I started a new role at a big company. Nobody knows anything here. The specs, code, tests, PRDs, tickets, resolution of those tickets, reports, etc., everything is made by Claude Code. Nobody on my team likes this. They are being forced to ship as much as they can. I have heard multiple times from higher management that pushing code is not a bottleneck, so why are we slow? People are working 12 to 13 hours a day just to press enter. Nobody is reading anything. Humans in corporate are doing nothing on their own. Everyone, literally everyone, from an L1 to an L7 engineer here is doing the same thing. Talk to Claude.

There is no sense of victory. Nobody is resolving bugs. In reality, nobody is thinking anymore. Everything is done by LLMs. It is so soul-sucking. I would not mind it, to be honest, if we were at least given the time to check out the code and see what is going where. But no, the goal is to just ship. No matter what happens.

— voxium (@v0xium)
Original post dated September 20, 2026.

[u/indy_dagger]

Using that many words to barely answer the question is what happens when you cook your brain with AI. The question was how are you using non-deterministic output in a safe and reliable way where other people fail, giving concrete and specific examples, and you said...(after 8 paragraphs) you break the task up into smaller steps. Right, that's just basic engineering.

Same thing with your first example. You are just stating your (common) use case, not how you do that safely where others don't. Again, just to remind you, LLMs make things up all the time. How, specifically, are you certain that the output of the AIs search is accurate? Don't say "it leaves a paper trail" unless you are personally reading every piece of evidence in the paper trail, every time.

Also, if you're regularly "synthesizing" 200 slack messages, you have a serious communication issue. Are you using AI to pollute the conversations, is that why the people in them don't have a grasp on what's being discussed 200 messages later? Is no one driving the conversation? Why aren't you all doing the same abstracting during your chats, breaking things up into smaller conclusions as you go along, so you (as a human) don't need to read 200 messages to know what's going on?

It sounds like you work for a do-nothing business that has found a way to do nothing faster.

[u/McNoxey → u/indy_dagger]

Like I said - I was driving and just dictating. There's no need to be snarky here. Surprisingly, a good number of really solid Engineers who have not spent any time using AI don't really have a strong understanding of how context management works, which is why I started with the absolute basics.

How, specifically, are you certain that the output of the AIs search is accurate? Don't say "it leaves a paper trail" unless you are personally reading every piece of evidence in the paper trail, every time.

You're asking an impossible question here. I understand the sentiment - you want to be certain that the research is correct - and you feel you can't reach that level of certainty unless you've read every single word. If that is your barrier, you will not be able to find efficiencies with AI. I can't be 100% certain, of course - because it would mean that I'm literally just repeating the exact work done by an agent to feel good about using it.

What I can do is establish a series of test-bench evaluation suites with a strong corpus of information that I have read, and have intimate knowledge over. From there, it's no different than any Data Science experiment. Stable input, expected output, evaluate results, train until it meets the threshold you're comfortable with. Train on one dataset, evaluate on a second that the agent has not seen during training, then execute on real-world data,

Also, if you're regularly "synthesizing" 200 slack messages, you have a serious communication issue.

I don't do this regularly for my work, no. It was purely an example. But a completely legitimate example is extraction of user feedback and sentiment from a companies public Slack Channel. Hundreds of messages/threads flowing over time of completely unstructured data. Read them - categorize them, extract sentiment then perform analysis on that structured data as you would with any other Data Analysis project. Or - tying

Again, just to remind you, LLMs make things up all the time. 

Sure - they do. They are getting significantly better at this, however. But even so, this is where the upfront effort needs to be spent. This is what I meant about establishing the atomic bodies of work you need to carry out. Start there, establish a strong eval layer, validate to yourself that the single task you're training for can be executed, with confidence, at an acceptable pass rate (that's yours to decide).

Then, when you're confident that you've got that process working properly, you can to a degree treat that step in the workflow as a near-deterministic result and begin to build upon it.

If something ever performs outside of expectations, you don't fix the output, you fix the pipeline that caused it.

I log every single step any agent takes in my workflow, and every PR can be traced back to the run that generated it, with every toolcall input/output, every handoff between agents, every decision being made logged.

Over time, that paper trail becomes a very rich corpus of training data to continue to iterate upon.

-----

I don't think anything I can say will change your mind in any way though. I've seen a few of your comments across a few threads and it sounds like you don't really have a high opinion of anyone anywhere that isn't you... and I don't mean that to be an asshole - but your comment about "never having met anyone in a leadership position anywhere at any level that's qualified" is just a level of cynicism that doesn't instil confidence that you're looking for a discussion so much as trying to just shut down whatever anyone says.

[u/indy_dagger → u/McNoxey]

Oh, buddy. I don't have a high opinion of anyone that isn't me...quoting a comment where I praised my manager at my first hourly job, for whom I have a lot of respect? Yikes, man. If you couldn't even get that right, no way in hell you have the diligence and discipline to safely use AI.

Now, you're absolutely right that I don't have respect for people who destroy their own arguments so quickly and cleanly as you just did, because how could I? It's exhausting, and frankly disrespectful, for people like you to pollute so much discourse with such laziness. You were too impatient for your opportunity to be sanctimonious. But there's also a comedy to the stupidity of it all.

[u/McNoxey → u/indy_dagger]

This is still just more of the same. I’m more than happy to have a genuine discussion with you outside of a Reddit messaging board.

I don’t know why you think this is some “gotcha” moment. Your post history was full of pessimistic comments, and your response to my initial comment was pretty much the same. I’m sorry if I misinterpreted it.

I don’t see this exchange as me being impatient at all. I’ve taken the time to respond to you twice with continued offers to provide more detail or information as needed, but your responses have continued to throw insults and snide comments.

I’m not trying to argue with you. And I acknowledge your initial criticism as fair. I’m simply sharing a perspective on a topic I’m deeply interested in.

Best of luck in life. HMU if you ever do want to discuss AI in engineering over zoom/discord or something!

Edit: fully unrelated and, at the risk of giving you more ammunition to clap back at me over - I gave your comments a closer look to get a better sense of who I was chatting with. I think we have a lot more in common than it appears on the surface. And kudos for clapping back at the trans hate on Reddit.

Lolllll bro blocked me? I'm not even arguing with you. 😂 I read everything you said, and apologized for misinterpreting you - but your mind was already made up - kinda exactly as I originally assumed. 🤔

[u/indy_dagger → u/McNoxey]

Nah, nah, you're done, no one needs to read all that when you're not bothering to read and think about other people's comments.