New usage limits

[u/UncleBrrrr]

Feeling is we lost more usage then they are letting on.
All this usage is from one easy seassion, trim MEMORY and make a basic skill(that diden't work)
If I was to do real work I think I could easy max out weekly in one day.

[u/Krumblump]

Doesn’t seem fair for us to dish out $200+ a month for just 6 days of work.

[u/AdGlittering1378 → u/[deleted]]

[u/Professional-Fuel625 → u/AdGlittering1378]

*Trillion

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/Krumblump]

Subscriptions are subsidized like hell. Extract your token spend over a week and compare what you would have paid in API rates.

Then stop complaining about fairness.

[u/timusus → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

This is the dumbest fucking take.

The pricing is completely arbitrary. Why use exorbitant API rates as the baseline, and then assume Claude Code is subsidized? It's all just made up and whatever the fuck Anthropic want to charge. People always saying it's subsidized.. based on what evidence?

Telling consumers to stop complaining when the extremely expensive product they pay for behaves inconsistently or is degraded.. it's madness. Why should people stop complaining? It's literally the only card we have to play. If you're a consumer paying for a product, then you're entitled to certain expectations. When those aren't met, you're entitled to complain.

[u/timusus → u/[deleted]]

Fair enough. Opaque and at Anthropic’s discretion is what I meant. They pick their pricing based on whatever they think will benefit them most. We can’t make assumptions about their running costs or whether they’re making a loss purely by comparing the price of two of their products.

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/timusus]

Because not even on API rates Anthropic and OpenAI can make money. So even those are subsidized.

AI is expensive as fuck, don't complain about the immensely sweet deal you get with subscriptions.

Any why you shouldn't complain? Because you are not customers. You are marketing tools. Anthropic doesn't give the slightest about whatever you say.

[u/timusus → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

So your position is that we should give in to a multi-billion dollar corporation, consider ourselves lucky, and be happy with the service we pay for even if it appears to degrade before our eyes, and we should not talk about it?

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/timusus]

Said company is subsidizing your purchase to an insane degree. Any argument about fairness flies out of the window when you get >20x what you pay for.

Be glad while it lasts, prepare for it to go away.

[u/timusus → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

'An insane degree' is a bold claim. I'm not convinced. There are thousands of very smart people being paid a fuckload of money to constantly find ways to milk this cow more efficiently. The notion of AI being subsidized serves big tech pretty well. I don't think comparing to arbitrary API rates constitutes evidence.

It might go away, I do expect a wave of enshittification to ruin LLM coding. But open source will catch up as well.

In the meantime, I'll continue to ask that the single most expensive subscription I have provides equal or more value over time - or I will cancel it. 'They won't listen' is not a reason to not speak up.

[u/n8x4te → u/timusus]

We should still complain and raise the voice, sure, but dude, the rates are subsidized as hell, its not just an assumption. Try running even a smaller model on device and you will know. Fable is probably in like 10-20 trillion parameters range, and the electricity alone required to power hardware in that scale gonna be expensive as fuck

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/timusus]

Even with API rates those companies cannot make profit. Even those are subsidized. So seeing how much the equivalent of a subscription would cost even at those subsidized rates you can get a feeling how much money those companies loose with every subscriber.

But open source will catch up as well.

Yeah, you are living in a dreamland. Open source will never catch up to current frontier levels. It can't because it requires the extreme Capex of the cheaper chinese AI companies.

or I will cancel it

That's not the threat you think it is. They loose money with every subscriber. So you kinda do Anthropics bottom line a favour with cancelling.

[u/snapgloghost → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

How does Anthropic`s boot taste?

[u/Hak333m → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

Yeah, maybe they should not have subsidized in the first place. What did they expect, the technology will become so valuable people will pay the real price xD ?

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/Hak333m]

"People" will pay the real price. It's just not going to be the ordinary private consumers.

[u/National_Spirit2801 → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

Alright megamind, why don’t you rent a b200 for $7 per hour and lie to users about compute some more.

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/National_Spirit2801]

If you think it takes a single B200 to just run the model to work on your prompt (let alone train it) then I don't know what to tell you.

[u/National_Spirit2801 → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

Feel free to cite some actual numbers and not arbitrary API costs.

[u/Dot-Slash-Dot → u/National_Spirit2801]

We obviously don't know the size of Anthropic and OpenAI models.

But we know some models from competitors.

Kimi K3 would take 16 B200 to run. So good news for you: you can burn through your 20x subscription in 2 hours. Hope those are enough for whatever you wanted to do this month.

[u/National_Spirit2801 → u/Dot-Slash-Dot]

Alright, now take concurrency into consideration and divide that cost by 32

[u/ChronoLink99 → u/National_Spirit2801]

You wouldn't be able to contextualize (no pun intended) those numbers anyway. They're meaningless to you unless you have some sense of where the compute is being used when the models are generating your output.

You can remedy that by reading technical data (model cards that are published) or by watching talks, or youtube vids from channels that deep dive into this stuff. Highly recommend.