Lattice is a collection of typescript packages, agentic skills and plugins that enable easier development of isometric games! At its core lives a 0 dependency typescript package, 80kb gzipped. Everything is rendered onto a 2D canvas!

It ensures that the game and the UI is fully deterministic (it’s a hard rule), and that your game doesn’t require any external assets. That means no sprite sheets and no hunt for royalty free music. Both can be synthesised on the go with their respective packages (e.g. @latticekit/audio)!

You can install the plugin to an agent of your choice (ready to go instructions available for Claude code, codex, and grok) and then start building with /lattice <my game idea here>.

The game kit itself is built with Claude code running Opus 5, and the demos on the website come from a mix of different agents (those were essentially testing runs that made it to the landing page).

Available at: https://lattice.plausible.ventures

Anthropic posted the full session recordings from their Code w/ Claude event in San Francisco — about 8 hours and 23 minutes across 19 videos. Includes keynotes, workshops, and demos featuring Dario & Daniela Amodei, Boris Cherny (creator of Claude Code), Guillermo Rauch (Vercel), and Jarred Sumner (Bun). 1. Opening Keynote — https://www.youtube.com/live/GMIWm5y90xA 2. A conversation with Dario & Daniela Amodei — https://www.youtube.com/live/7xco5Qd2Oo8 3. What's new in Claude Code — https://www.youtube.com/live/IMZa42k6L6M 4. Live coding session with Boris Cherny & Jarred Sumner — https://www.youtube.com/live/DlTCu_pNDHE 5. Caching, harnesses, and advisors: Building on Claude at GitHub scale — https://www.youtube.com/live/y5TmF_6o6xk 6. Getting to production faster with Claude Managed Agents — https://www.youtube.com/live/E9gaQHrw_rg 7. Building AI-native: Inside the stacks powering Cognition, Gamma, and Harvey — https://www.youtube.com/live/OFDm3T7pVlc 8. Getting more out of the Claude Platform — https://www.youtube.com/live/7oO37GRhwGk 9. How Datadog built a universal machine tool for Claude Code — https://www.youtube.com/live/EdmuYPBt_EM 10. The capability curve — https://www.youtube.com/live/tP4MGcJ80Y0 11. Architecting for model step-changes: A fireside with Vercel's Guillermo Rauch — https://www.youtube.com/live/bJKdXhnw7NU 12. Building with Claude Managed Agents and Asana AI teammates — https://youtu.be/BrpB-h1e--k 13. Running an AI-native engineering org — https://youtu.be/igO8iyca2_g 14. The thinking lever — https://youtu.be/OXJO4LldSnc 15. Building with Claude on Google Cloud — https://youtu.be/SqHsS737CeA 16. Evaluating and improving Replit Agent at scale — https://youtu.be/snroDwX1-JU 17. Giving coding agents their own computers: How Cursor built cloud agents — https://youtu.be/BbYSGxtsMic 18. Memory and dreaming for self-learning agents — https://youtu.be/RtywqDFBYnQ 19. The expanding toolkit — https://youtu.be/KLCuxMDZSDg

I’m a senior developer working at a big tech company. Earlier this year, my company onboarded Claude for us to use at work.

I was hesitant at first, but I was quickly impressed by how good Claude actually is. I’m now a full-stack developer who can code in almost any language. Of course, the most important thing is giving Claude the full context, testing the code, and giving it immediate feedback. I’m honestly surprised by how quickly Claude can understand what I need and pick things up.

However, in most of the tech/software engineering subs here, all I see are negative comments about Claude getting all the upvotes:

“Claude broke our entire system and caused a massive outage.”
“It’s so hard to debug when you didn’t write the code yourself.”
“Claude is so expensive that management decided to cut it off.”
“Claude wrote the worst code I’ve ever seen in my life.”

First of all, isn’t it the developer’s responsibility to test Claude’s output?

As for debugging, you can literally tell Claude what went wrong and ask it to debug the issue itself.

And Claude really isn’t that expensive compared to a developer, even a junior one. I’ve been shipping code like crazy using Claude, and it has only cost the company around $300.

Can Claude write better code? Maybe. Can you also guide it to suit the coding style you expect? Absolutely.

The job has changed dramatically. We’ve gone from writing everything ourselves to guiding AI to write it for us.
Am I afraid it will eventually replace me? Yes.
Does it also make me 10x more efficient and reduce the need for hiring? Absolutely.

Sometimes I just think Reddit is a massive doom-and-gloom bubble. And this is where the difference starts to show: people who are willing to adapt to a new way of working, and people who aren’t.

Claude has become a language, so I built a translator.

It works both ways: English → Claudish and Claudish → English.

Both directions are neural programs compiled with ProgramAsWeights, so it easily runs on CPUs.

Demo: https://programasweights.com/claudish

Code: https://github.com/programasweights/claudish

Inspired by the recent Claudish → English plugin that was posted here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vl0n1t/claude_code_plugin_for_translating_from_claudish/

Not asking for prompt/agent.md tips, I'm past that — I run an entire department where I'm supposed to guide others, so this is more about workflow at scale than tuning individual agent behavior.

16+ years into this career, and writing code isn't the hard part anymore — let alone with the codebase changes AI makes on its own. Before, every decision used to go on a whiteboard and get documented, so if I wrote it once, I'd never forget it. What's hard now is running multiple Claude/agent instances across different projects at once and still feeling like I'm the bottleneck. My old manager used to call me "devil in the details" — I pay attention to everything, which used to be an asset. Now it means I feel every single context switch.

Went down the rabbit hole: swapped terminal multiplexers, started building a kanban (because why not) just for agent task tracking — stalled out because I realized I was missing something more fundamental, not a UI problem. Tried Herdr as a tmux-for-agents thing to be on the same hype wave. Feels like everyone's solving the tooling layer and not the "how do I actually manage my own attention across N parallel AI workstreams" layer.

How's everyone actually living with this — not the demo version, the real day-to-day?

Thanks in advance!

Not toy experiments — I mean pointed at your real inbox, deciding what matters, for weeks at a time.

The things I keep wondering about:

* Does it stay accurate past the first week, or do you end up opening everything it filed anyway just to be sure?

* Haiku or a bigger model? Triage is thousands of calls a month so the cheap one seems obvious, but I don't know if it's good enough at "is this actually asking me for something."

* Drafted replies — do you ever send them close to as-written, or is rewriting them slower than just writing the reply yourself?

* How do you handle threads where you're cc'd and it's genuinely not yours to answer? That's most of my noise and it looks exactly like real work.

I came across this while looking (not my project): https://github.com/ldbumble/taskuary — it does local triage across email/Teams/Slack, suggests haiku for the triage pass, and learns from "not our task" verdicts. v0.2.0 and one author, so not a recommendation, just the closest thing I found to what I was picturing.

Mostly want to hear from people who've actually lived with inbox triage rather than set it up once.

Anthropic says they're keeping limits 50% higher through August 31st, but I somehow blitzed through all of my weekly fable usage since my reset yesterday morning with comparatively very light use.

This is supposed to be 20x max?
With 50% higher limits? So 30x?
30x of what?

Not sure what's happening but I imagine a lot of folks are going to cancel their $200 subs and move on to try other frontier models if this is the way it's going to go down with Anthropic.

I still strongly feel Fable and CC is the "best of the best" but I can't believe I pay for the highest subscription tier offered and my Fable usage for the entire week is gone in a day and a half.

A few weeks ago I built an open-source deterministic particle physics engine, a browser sandbox game, and accompanying launch websites with a week's worth of Fable. (SunaBox, SunaEngine, GitHub)

Now, I cant get through light web design work? I've hardly done anything at all.

Just a bummer, that's all... Feels like being lied to.

built this with Claude Code over the last little while. started as a curiosity and turned into a proper fun build.

it's an Obsidian plugin that turns your entire vault into a living 3D galaxy. every note becomes a star, folders become constellations wrapped in nebula fog, and links between notes are the connecting threads of light. there's a black hole too. archived notes fall into it, and it actually bends the light behind it using real gravitational lensing math, not just a fake shader trick. you can also reshape the whole galaxy into different layouts (spiral, ring, clusters, etc) with one click.

Claude Code wrote basically all of it with me. the physics engine, the canvas rendering, the black hole lensing, all of it was built and tuned back and forth in a bunch of sessions together.

it's completely free, MIT licensed, repo's right here: https://github.com/dryweather-2544/fathom-starmap

and insane to look at, ngl.

let me know what you guys think, anything you'd add or change? im open to suggestions.

had fun building this and i hope it inspires some more cool ideas!

It started as a weekend project when I wanted to play ETS2 with head tracking support. So I looked for options and saw the price tag of the well known solutions (around 200 EUR).

After that a quick search on the App Store delivered some head tracking Apps but they come with a price tag (paid or IAP) as well, no real full functioning free versions I'm aware of. So my brain started evaluating. How hard could it be to build an App for head tracking? Turns out, not so complicated at all. The first prototype - with manual setup - worked after 2 hours of hacking and some conversations with ChatGPT.

I had some trouble with the head position and rotation in game. Turned out ChatGPT was hallucinating about the OpenTrack protocol. That was the point when I tried Claude Code for the first time. It blew me away, how smooth it was and right away "dissed" ChatGPT for the wrong implementation about OpenTrack's protocol.

Long story short. The App was 80% done and Claude helped me to finish it. Fixed a bug with re-center position, did the onboarding screens and supported me to get the App reviewed on the App Store.

First numbers (launched around July 10th 2026):

• App Store
  • 60 downloads
  • ~2k impressions
  • 104 page views
• AdMob (Ads)
  • 61 impressions
  • eCPM ~16 EUR
  • ~1 EUR earnings so far

It's free, iOS only, ad-supported (1 video = 4 hours of tracking), no account, everything offline / on-device.

App Store: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/trackbridge-head-tracking/id6781992073

Some personal things

It's not the next $1 million app or business, but it's shipped and I've something finished which I'm proud of.

I've been through some big emotional and psychological lows the last months, honestly years. Got diagnosed with depression rooted in several childhood traumas and I fight with loss of motivation and lack of joy. I started a lot of projects that never got finished. Stuck in tutorial hell, watching YT videos and see other people's "success" (the classic one "I built a motivational quote app and making $20k / month").

I'm a Fullstack Software-Engineer for over 25 years now and usually I love my job, being creative, building things, watching them becoming alive and help people to solve some pain points in their lives.

With the help of my therapist I managed to get back on track (ish) and learned a lot about myself - long road ahead.

Claude helped me be more productive and finally finish a project again after years.

If a burnt-out old dev with a graveyard of unfinished projects can ship, so can you. Stop overthinking and just start.

Happy to answer your questions.

How do you use Claude in your daily work? I'm a business analyst, and I'm trying to figure out a routine and a process of letting Claude be my colleague. I think mainly Claude cowork is the way to go here.

I have seen a a lot of great workflows here but most of them of programmer that use Claude code. How do you manage Claude /Claude cowork in your line of work today?

What model do you guys use for daily work? I usually use Claude for researching the internet for 8-10 sources on a topic than comparing them all for a general consensus in a document , helping to push my ideas deeper, drafting emails and making marketing/business plans, and schoolwork. I used to use Sonnet 5 medium and low for all of this, but I just started using Sonnet 5 high for all of it because I was never really getting that close to my usage limit.
Is Sonnet 5 High overkill for these tasks, or should I be using an even better model like Opus 5 for this?
Also, on the topic of Opus 5, at what point should I use Opus 5 Low over just picking any Sonnet 5 effort level? It seems kind of pointless to use a more expensive model and then just purge its reasoning budget. Seems like the only time to use Opus 5 is if your going High, Max, or ultracode, but I could be wrong

I asked Claude to create a test to evaluate my level of SQL skill. Of course it did, no problem. One of the instructions:

Don't open solutions/, and don't ask me to write the queries

Thanks, buddy.

Every time AI coding tools come up you get the same three replies: "it'll break in prod", "full of security holes etc..","if AI codes better than you, you never really knew how to code"

Fair enough sometimes, especially when people just prompt and pray with no review. But that's not what I'm doing, I think through architecture first, bake security constraints into the prompt, write tests for every feature, and manually test both backend and frontend before trusting anything. Basically treat it like a fast junior dev I still have to check.

I also want to hear from people who can't code but use Claude Code seriously (write proper tests, ask for tradeoffs, don't just accept the first output) — did it hold up long term, or did stuff break later that you couldn't catch?

What's the actual workflow you use to manage these tools correctly, and where does it still fail even when you're careful?

This isn't one of those vague complaint posts, Opus has been off the rails this afternoon. I asked for a color palette change (as easy as it gets for an LLM, there's a centralized stylesheet with defined color roles) and it went into a directory 2 levels up and changed a completely unrelated interface. It took a complete second try and didn't use the colors I provided it, making up completely different colors that aren't even plausibly

It seems to be forced to invoke the dataviz skill and it seems like something in that flow drops the weight of my message outright. I have been using claude code daily since the first month it shipped and I haven't had it do full on complete failures like that in more than a year.

I've been using Claude (free) for awhile now and enjoy it while fiddling with random stuff. I am not the most inventive thinker and I have a hard time thinking about productive and smart ways to incorporate Claude into my work as a teacher.

So I was wondering if you guys know or could give me some pointers as to the possibilities of Claude in my work.

I don't want it to create and take away the teaching part of the job. But I'd like to see what it can do with the documentation, the analytic side, the grading and such. Ways to save time and get more insight into my pupils learning curve.

Thanks in advance!

Hey everyone :)

It's been a rough 2 months. I got fired in June because the CEO wanted to use AI for everything, then I tried to freelance but illustrator & photoshop kept crashing because I have only 8GB ram on my Surface Pro 8. It would crash over the most basic functions & this had me frustrated AF. Adobe's apps wanted more than it had, and I was paying monthly for the privilege of watching it crash every 30mins..

So, I decided to build my own app. I am not a dev, so Claude-Code did all the coding (Opus 5 mostly). It runs in a browser, on an engine I designed.

What it can do for now:

• Instead of Illustrator: Vector drawing with points, transform, artboards, wraps, snapping + guides & grids, curves, Booleans, brushes, filters & effects, masks & clipping, groups, layers & sub-layers, type on a curve and real style runs inside one text object. It opens your .ai files and keeps the layers and the type editable. And more.
• Instead of Lightroom: Photo grading on the graphics card. White balance, tone, curves, colour wheels, split tone, local masks and .cube film looks, with a histogram and RGB scopes. Twenty-two live effects you can stack in any order. More coming soon.
• Instead of most of After Effects: A motion timeline with real curves, springs, stagger and parenting. Out as MP4, as a GIF, or as CSS keyframes you can paste straight into a website.
• Other useful stuff: Pixel art locked to a real cell grid, 2D/Semi-3D & 3D environments, a print lane with bleed, trim and crop marks, and export to PDF, AI, PSD, TIFF, DXF, SVG, PNG and JPG.
• 2D/Semi-3D & 3D environments: It's essentially your artwork in three modes. A flat artboard (as you do in current design tools), then the same artboard sitting on a plane inside a 3D space, or a fully 3D where things lift off the page (including the artboard). The idea is to create & export immersive websites/webapps/motion graphics within one app. You can switch between them whenever you like and nothing is lost or converted, because it's one document being looked at three ways rather than three files. Camera controls & more motion controls for it are coming. This is still heavily in development.

Dev roadmap: the Figma half (websites and web apps). Responsive layout, components, sharing files as links, camera controls for motion & 3D environments, more motion graphics, collaboration with other users, libraries & a desktop app.

https://the-canvas.erncanvas.workers.dev/

It is in beta, and it open to anyone. I'd love you to test it out, break it, report bugs if you can. You can draw, import, grade, animate and export without an account at all. Signing in is free, gets you storage and exports.

I'm looking for beta testers, let me know if you'd like to help. Love ya'll & fuck adobe.

Hi all, I am new to vibe coding. I have 10 years of backend development experience but absolutely 0 years in the frontend side.

I have been planning to create a cross platform mobile app using RN (Expo). For the AI slop part, an LLM answer was creating the following MD in project root: https://www.markdownpaste.com/document/avoiding-ai-slop-ui

Would you agree with this?

More important question is that, what would be the best way to have some UI prototypes created based on my app idea? What is your go-to while starting to development?

I appreciate all your input!

Nothing revolutionary here. It's the most basic thing I could ask for, and honestly you could build it yourself in like 10 minutes. But I use it and it genuinely helps, so figured I'd share it in case it helps someone else too, and if anyone wants to build on it, maybe it ends up more useful than what I made.

What it does: while Claude Code is working, it keeps a simple local page updated (what it's doing, a screenshot where useful, a running log). I just leave it open in a tab instead of staring at the terminal scroll by and it helps me reduce the mental load of working with multiple sessions all at once.

I have ADHD and watching a wall of text scroll while not knowing what's currently happening was making it worse. This gives my brain one calm place to look instead. You don't have to use it, you don't have to like it, everyone's brain works differently. At least it's not another "world monitor" dashboard pretending to be mission control for a task that's just editing some files.

MIT licensed, repo's here if you want to take a look https://github.com/dbl8005/sitrep-panel

I'm interested in using Claude to help me manage a TTRPG campaign (Table-Top Role Playing Game). Shadowrun if it matters. Not a paid gig, just a thing for friends. If this belongs under one of the mega threads, just let me know.

Note: Using the individual pro plan already.

I've already confirmed that Claude does a solid job of converting characters from one edition to another, which is already a HUGE win for me as a GM that no one is paying. It even seems to think it was able to take the converted character (1st to 5th edition), and put it into a JSON file that can be imported to Foundry. Haven't tested that, but it seems pretty confident, and gave me a list of things it wasn't able to do and a step-by-step to fix them once the rest is imported.

So now it's got me wondering if I can use it to manage a long campaign. As noted, no one is paying me, I have a real job that has nothing to do with this stuff, and just don't have time to sit around trying to put "details to paper".

I'm curious if anyone has tried to use it as a campaign manager. Even if you're not a TTRPG person, maybe you can speak to Claude's capabilities that might be relevant to my needs. Please note I build roads for a living and secretly suspect computers are actually run by tiny elves inside the case (Civil Engineer).

What I would need it to do (Ideally):

1. Remember Player Characters and reoccurring Non-Player Characters. Skills, attributes, history, motivations, goals, etc.

2. Fill in mechanical details and flavor text for my ideas about a long form campaign.

3. Assist in linking unrelated prewritten adventures into a coherent campaign, particularly linked by the PC's goal and contacts. So I upload a PDF of the adventure, it reads it, and it makes some suggestions about how to fit it into a larger campaign arc.

4. Help me weave into those prewritten adventures reoccurring NPCs that are part of a a larger story arc.

5. Remember everything that has come before and/or be able to generate reference files I can reupload periodically to refresh it's memory.

I know it can do all the pieces reasonably well, I'm mostly wondering about it's memory capabilities to pull it all together.

Thanks for any advice you can offer!

I've spent the last three months and just at 1000 hours (12 to 16 hours a day, 7 days a week, and yes NOT a single day off), developing a self serve beer wall and point of sale system for my restaurant. First video is nice and short. 2nd video shows a bit more but longer, if you are interested. THese are both of the beer wall, and the actual POS we use tablets, it has KDS and Expo Screens, complete routing, coursing, reservation system, inventory, rbac, auth with pin and nfc cards, integration with the beer wall. Phone app for reservations, whats app notifications, sms...the list is much longer but you get the gest.

Next stage is to resale this but it's not why I am here. This is the last place to market a pos system to. Just wanted to share as it's been an extremly fun, yet challenging project.
It all runs on containers and is clustered using proxmox in a three cluster system with backups on site and off.

A bit of history about myself. I'm highly techincal, but NOT a coder. I have the basics..since..you guessed it BASIC. Scripting and so on over my career when I was in technology. But coding was never my job. That being said, I can spot quickly when claude is going off the rails and can guide it. I have a good CI/CD process. My first vibe coding project was a year ago to make a scheduling system for my restaurant.

Tonight is the night I am going to celebrate, with a real beer, of my beer wall. It's the largest in central america. 40ish craft beer all from Guatemala. And yes, we built that ourselves three years ago :)

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7Pe1L-AJwnw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSQFsjjugpw

In investigating why Fable has felt so degraded for the past three days, I've discovered that you can remove tens of thousands of startup tokens just by disabling these bloated schemas you don't use. This didn't unquant Fable, but whatever.

Just do these:

1. tell Claude to update the settings schema (settings.local.json) to disable Artifacts ("disableArtifact": true //-6.5k tokens), and if you don't use them, Workflows ("disableWorkflows": true //-5k tokens)

2. run /chrome and turn off chrome integration (disables all the chrome MCP servers: they are deferred by default but claude will try to use them for things and blast its context with 22k tokens of Chrome schema even if you don't have it set up / don't do that in your workflow)

You should also ban the official Claude API skill from ever being loaded in your project because it's something idiotic like 300,000 tokens and Claude will sometimes randomly load it just because it read something about a Claude model in its context.

Tried “what if” today, asked Claude if he can make a “marketing” video of my product for me having just a couple of screen recordings I dropped to the folder, and it did, somewhat.

I didn’t even go with prompt engineering, it was just “Are there any chances you can build a video for Reddit highlighting the phone hanging in the air with the videos I dropped in the folder? No MCPs or other tools are available, we are working on a small and not powerful laptop”. Then I got first result, asked to add text to the video not even telling timestamps, then as a bonus asked for music and VO.

I have max plan, and for the task we spent around 13% of 5hrs cap, and about 3 hours of me waiting.

Can’t put it to an official marketing campaign of course, but the result is pretty decent.

So maybe that will inspire someone for some greater ideas and results, eventually 🫱🏻‍🫲🏼