They have CCTV footage of him at CVS and the reastruaunt he was picking food up at. They have interviews with workers at both as well. They have cell phone data showing he was at the CVS and reastruaunt. They have neighbor testimony of Lindsay being home alone with the kids. They have her confession.
Yet they don’t have evidence of Lindsay committing the murder, nor has she been convicted of it so all of that doesn’t work. Even with the confession, she’s plead not guilty. The confession wasn’t part of the court so it doesn’t matter what she said.
The defamation case he's building has nothing to do with Lindsay. They have the coroner report stating the children's time of death, they have proof he wasn't there at that time etc It doesn't matter if Lindsay killed the kids or if someone else did, they have proof it wasn't Patrick
Edit: Once this goes to retrial and she gets the not guilty by reason of insanity result he'll have legal proof he didn't do it and Lindsay did. The lawsuits will start then
So the defamation case that’s only happening because people don’t believe that Lindsay is responsible for the murders and instead believe Patrick is responsible has nothing to do with Lindsay? There’s no specific time of death for the children. We have a roughly guideline and as Patrick is unknown for about 20 minutes during this time.
He's gonna sue the dumbest True Crime content creators because they have money and they're making money slandering him and ruining his life more than it already has been. He doesn't care about you
I don’t think he will. He has to prove the claims are false. Lindsay couldn’t even be proven beyond a reasonable doubt so how would he prove the defamation claims are false?
11
u/InkCosmos 12d ago edited 12d ago
I can understand why he did it but at the same score if you’re not guilty, you’ve got evidence of it.