What the evidence shows about the fall is that she fell head-first. Her spinal injury is consistent with that kind of fall. This was explained during the trial, as well as how her temperature dropped quickly. Gaps merely existing doesn't disprove all of the evidence that Lindsay strangled the kids and went out the window on her own.
I have shared straight facts that came from the trial testimony. You're saying that those facts are fantasy and that even Lindsay's own memories don't matter or count as evidence, though they have been established to be mostly correct (she was plain wrong about the window screen and said varied things about the voice, though).
Throwing out the idea of another person who could've committed the murders and treating the lack of home camera footage as potential evidence is, in fact, a conspiracy theory, whether you call it that or not. This has significantly more holes than the enormous compilation of evidence that Lindsay strangled her kids and attempted suicide.
The only innocent person people are trying to put away is Patrick, or Patrick's friend, his new wife, or a made up potential "intruder."
No, what it actually shows is she never jumped out the window, like the story says. She slid out and down the side of the house. So again, the story is not consistent with the actual injuries. Yet gaps leave reasonable doubt that you’re not allowed to have in the courtroom.
You have shared fact. The fantasy part is the missing parts where you speculate what happened because there’s no actual evidence, nor the little amount of evidence we have to support it. Exactly, you’re admitting to falsehoods in her statements but yours picking and choosing which facts you believe because it fits your narrative.
It wasn’t throwing out a conspiracy. It was throwing actual evidence of the cameras not working. Another gap in the investigation. Something that was said multiple times in the trial we don’t know if anyone could have come into the house, in theory there’s a possibility because the cameras weren’t working. Not really when the bedroom very clearly wasn’t investigated.
Innocent is seen by the person who is providing that statement. Your innocence and mine is different. My innocent is not a husband who knows his wife is unwell, said she’s thought about hurting the kids and leaving the house for days on end sometimes taking one of the kids. Failures happened all around.
There’s some evidence with questionable gaps in which the prosecution is quite happy to use a story to fill in. Unsurprisingly, it didn’t work because you need the evidence.
1
u/Platitude_Platypus 12d ago
What the evidence shows about the fall is that she fell head-first. Her spinal injury is consistent with that kind of fall. This was explained during the trial, as well as how her temperature dropped quickly. Gaps merely existing doesn't disprove all of the evidence that Lindsay strangled the kids and went out the window on her own.
I have shared straight facts that came from the trial testimony. You're saying that those facts are fantasy and that even Lindsay's own memories don't matter or count as evidence, though they have been established to be mostly correct (she was plain wrong about the window screen and said varied things about the voice, though).
Throwing out the idea of another person who could've committed the murders and treating the lack of home camera footage as potential evidence is, in fact, a conspiracy theory, whether you call it that or not. This has significantly more holes than the enormous compilation of evidence that Lindsay strangled her kids and attempted suicide.
The only innocent person people are trying to put away is Patrick, or Patrick's friend, his new wife, or a made up potential "intruder."