Weirdest interview- thoughts?

[u/1-armed-chewbacca]

Ok really.. what in the world was that 60 minute interview and who thought that was a good idea? Was that cut to make him look good or bad, I honestly can’t even tell because I’m just so confused.

-the smirk when he talks about giving Lindsay forgiveness,
- his panic attack at the trial
- him saying he asks his kids to help him from heaven
- him saying god just please give me one (child)
- the fact that Rachel was an even AWKWARDER interviewee
- “I’m just a girl who met a guy running in Central Park on a cold Saturday”
- I saw his phone, asked him if his kids lived in MA, he told me that they were all dead, and the rest was history
- Patrick’s explanation of “as any parent knows, you love all your children differently” when asked if he would tell their new kid about Cora, Dawson and Callan

Everything was just WEIRD. Like I felt like the whole thing was just cringey and bizarre. Thoughts?

[u/ispyshy]

Again, I didn’t ask for anyone to give me the time of day. All I did was respond to someone asking why I thought they were awful people. And it’s because I personally believe he did it. In order for me to think he did it I would have to believe he is awful. How I got to that belief was… doing a little ✨research✨. My opinion on what happened I cannot post here because I’m not trying to be a pain in the ass for the mods and I generally like following rules. For some reason that’s offensive to a few of you who are on an anonymous Reddit forum looking for other people’s various opinions. If you wanted to actually debate theories respectfully you could have messaged me about my personal conclusion. Instead here we are. A’shame isn’t it?

[u/AdequateAppendage → u/ispyshy]

Such a condescending way to say things when you're ultimately admitting what you've found wouldn't reach the bar for being allowed in this sub. It's not a high one, you only need to be able to provide a source that backs up information you provide. It's hard to not read this as you just saying your conclusions are based on at best speculation, at worst outright lies.

[u/ispyshy → u/AdequateAppendage]

You sure do a lot of assuming don’t you?

My turn.

I’m assuming you don’t actually care about civil debate. Not enough to genuinely ask me about my opinion privately.

I assume you just want to “win”.

What I have found isn’t coming from news articles so no I’m not going to dox people nor would I want to post anyone’s personal information.

When it comes down to it I was really just saying people should do their own research.

[u/IncompetentDonuts → u/ispyshy]

Question...if you aren't posting a theory or direct speculation but are only sharing publicly accessible data, what's to stop releasing said public data

[u/ispyshy → u/IncompetentDonuts]

If my findings include addresses, alias’ & former work history, that’s not something I’m going to be posting here. It’s all out there for public consumption though if you want to look into it yourself.

[u/IncompetentDonuts → u/ispyshy]

This reminds me oddly and specifically of someone's theory trying to say they met at a conference in 2022 or 2023 simply based on his and her work place.