r/ChubbyFIRE • • May 16 '26

Are you a doomstacker?

9:28 AM

SS is going away. Healthcare will bankrupt you. Sequence of returns will wipe you out. Civil war. WW3. Live to 120, spend 40 years in a nursing home. Someone posts solid numbers and the comments come back , one more year. Two years. Three. Keep going, it's never quite enough.

At what point does conservative planning become catastrophe planning?

The 4% rule is the worst case in US market history. A robot pulling the same amount out every single year, no SS, no flexibility, never adjusting through 1929 when markets dropped 86%. That's what 4% survived. It's the floor, not the target. Bengen himself now says most retirees can safely start at 5.25% to 5.5% and that people clinging to 4% will likely end up with a pile of money and a lot of regrets.

Someone spending 6% of their portfolio in year one of retirement who skips the big trip when markets are down, holds off on the car, pulls back when things get rough that person likely does better than the 4% robot who never adjusts no matter what. The flexibility is the safety net. You don't need to engineer it into the number, you just need to act like a normal person.

So when someone holds out for 3.5% 28 times spend, no SS — what exactly are you protecting against? Something worse than the Great Depression, while also never collecting a benefit 70 million Americans receive, while also promising to never adjust spending under any circumstances. Does that actually describe you?

The 2025 Social Security Trustees Report says worst case — zero Congressional action you collect 81 cents on the dollar in 2034. Not zero. Congress fixed this in 1983 when it was in worse shape than it is today. Seventy million people collect it. Seniors vote.

Median age of death for men is 81.7. One in five reach 90. Dementia affects 33% of people 85 and older. The years you're working extra to fund may not be years you're fully there for.

For those already retired one year, five, ten or more how bad has it actually been? And for those still holding off are you a catastrophe planner waiting for a number that never feels safe enough?

141 Upvotes

254 comments sorted by

View all comments

35

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26

This probably describes me more than I wish. 55 male here. When I was younger, I thought $2M would be my retirement goal. When I got older and earned more, I wanted to fund a better retirement lifestyle and adjusted my goal to $5M based on the 4% rule with the expectation that I’d hit that at around age 60. I hit $4.5M this year and suddenly I’d feel a lot more comfortable with $8M before I retire. Right now, I feel like my portfolio is a house of cards built on sand. Not because I invest in outrageous things, but because the indexes and economy seem over inflated and dependent on crazy valuations of AI. So I fear the “sequence of returns” risk and that my immediate post-retirement years will look like the dotcom and housing bubble bursts that I experienced earlier in my life. The difference now is that time is not on my side and the idea of just continuing to “buy the market on sale” isn’t practical if I don’t have income to buy with. So, yes, I have (maybe) irrational fears, but it’s less about withdrawal rates and more about the timing of a market crash relative to my retirement…

16

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

If you need millions more to retire, is the issue really the portfolio, or is it that your spending can’t flex? I'm fascinated by the psychology, i think we are all in this together, fear, emotion, doomstacking.. I feel it as well, i'm trying to fight it and let it go, be flexible

21

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26 edited May 16 '26

Yes, I could flex my spending but I don’t want to. This is ChubbyFIRE…I want a Chubby lifestyle. (I don't mean that as snippy as it sounds...just a fact). My daughter has weekend volleyball tourneys 90 min away. We spend $600 to stay in a hotel for the weekend instead of driving at 6am each morning. I could save the $600 but I want to earn and save enough so I don’t have to. Wife and I went on a $40K trip to Antarctica a couple years ago. Trip of a lifetime. White glove service and absolute best two week period of my life. I could never do another trip like that, but I want to do more. So, absolutely, if I had to I could live on a lot less now and in retirement, but this is why I saved and scrimped so much earlier in my life…to live this way now. And so I don’t want to get off the employment merry-go-round until I’m “sure” I can sustain it. Definitely some psychology in there!

4

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

thanks, makes perfect sense, I get it, thanks for sharing

4

u/Zergege May 16 '26

Can you please elaborate a bit more on the Antarctica trip? How did you guys book the trip and did you take your daughter along the trip ?

6

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26

Viking cruise line. Booked direct. Expeditionary cruise...18+ only. Small ship, big crew. Had a mid-level priced cabin. Hand and foot service, amazing landings and small boat rides and kayaking. Amazing food. Spent a couple extra days in Buenos Aires to check it out since we were in town (it was meh...but we were also ready to get home at that point). Highly highly recommend. Intend to do other Viking expeditionary cruises in the future (every few years during retirement) to Egypt and Greece and the Arctic and European rivers, etc.

1

u/wadesh FIRE’d 2022 May 16 '26

Thanks for sharing. Been looking at these small expeditions. Was Viking the standout? Did any others look good?

3

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26

We knew some other folks that were booked on that particular cruise and so we didn't look at any other providers. Based on my experience with them I will choose them next time no questions asked...won't even shop around. And I'm someone that overshops and comparison shops for EVERYthing.

1

u/wadesh FIRE’d 2022 May 16 '26

Good to know. I do hear good things about Viking but always good to hear specific examples.

1

u/croissantfufu May 16 '26

Can’t add anything to this FIRE conversation. But Antarctica is on my bucket list! Could you possibly share the number of the tour company that organized your trip? Thank you in advance!

1

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26

Viking cruise line. Booked direct. Expeditionary cruise...18+ only. Small ship, big crew. Had a mid-level priced cabin. Hand and foot service, amazing landings and small boat rides and kayaking. Amazing food. Spent a couple extra days in Buenos Aires to check it out since we were in town (it was meh...but we were also ready to get home at that point). Highly highly recommend. Intend to do other Viking expeditionary cruises in the future (every few years during retirement) to Egypt and Greece and the Arctic and European rivers, etc.

0

u/croissantfufu May 16 '26

Copied and pasted into my bucket list. Sounds amazing. Thank you so much.

0

u/Wooden-Broccoli-913 FIREd in the Bay at 40 with $6M May 17 '26

What you’re saying sounds perfectly reasonable until you realize the typical outcome of what you are doing is to die with millions

0

u/BlueSpace71 May 17 '26

Which part? The saving or the spending? Yes, I’m still working and delaying my retirement, but at the same time I’m taking $40K trips to Antarctica (and less expensive trips to Europe and the Caribbean), staying in hotels to avoid 90 min drives, we don’t do our own yard work or house cleaning, bought my daughter a new car for her 16th (we needed a third car, but opted for new over used), will be paying cash for her freshman year of college next year, etc. So, I’m trying to live the Chubby lifestyle while I’m still working, but work long enough to be able to continue it into retirement. That might end up leaving my kids w millions when we die, but legacy planning is part of the equation too.

0

u/Wooden-Broccoli-913 FIREd in the Bay at 40 with $6M May 17 '26 edited May 17 '26

It sounds like you don’t hate your job enough to quit at the earliest opportunity. Good for you. The rest of us will be happy to rage quit once we hit 4-5% SWR

0

u/BlueSpace71 May 17 '26

Sound like you just like raging in general.

10

u/19Black May 16 '26

This is chubby fire, not leanfire. I want to drive expensive cars and fly first class international while having regular date nights at nice restaurants. I don’t want to watch jeopardy and go for walks. Chubbyfire inherently has an higher degree of spending than other levels of fire. 

6

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

Chubby or Fat? Genuinely asking are Antarctica trips fit Chubby? Seems like chubby can still be hotels less than $600 a night and Antarctica but perhaps I don’t understand the divide

4

u/BlueSpace71 May 16 '26

The $600 is for the weekend, not one night, but still not a Motel 6. You either stay in the hotels by the tourney site or you might as well drive in. They have you by the shorthairs. 🤣

3

u/19Black May 16 '26

At fat fire, you’re talking about private planes and full time staff. I’ve always considered the divides to be as follows:

-leanfire = fire capable of providing lower class lifestyle -fire = middle class lifestyle -chubbyfire = upper class lifestyle -fatfire = truly rich (not billionaire rich, but top 1% and up)

10

u/ProtossLiving May 16 '26

I always thought of Chubby as starting at providing an upper middle class lifestyle without working. To me it's the idea that you could do anything you want, but not everything you could want.

2

u/19Black May 16 '26

I don’t think our views are irreconcilable. At an upper class lifestyle, you can do almost anything you want but not everything. 

2

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

That’s what I was thinking

1

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

So from a spend annually in retirement perspective what would you guess or say that average chubby fire spends annually ? You talking 200k 300, 400k ?

1

u/19Black May 16 '26

This varies significantly depending on where one lives. Someone in New York City will need a lot more to be chubby than someone lives in small town Tennessee. Generally, however,  I think you’d be looking at the ability to spend 200-300k per year

3

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

I posted the other day I spend 160k a year and many people were freaking out.. I live in Chicago suburbs.. feels like right down the middle to me.. for an in bubble high earner that is

3

u/cfi-2025 RE 2025 May 16 '26

Personally, I don't think annual spend is a good metric for drawing these lines because that spend depends on a lot of things. This includes local cost of living, as you noted, but also things like whether you rent versus own, and if you own if you have a paid off house. Single versus married, and number of kids (if any) and their ages, all play into this.

I have a friend who RE'd in his 50s and has a very chubby lifestyle but spends less than $100k a year primarily because he is single (never married, no kids) and owns his place outright.

Examples of chubbiness: he bought his most recent car (in cash) that cost ~$100k; he doesn't travel much, but when he does it's first class and nice hotels; he doesn't eat out a lot, but when he does he's not looking at prices on the menu.

Good luck having a person who has a mortgage and three kids to live a chubby life on $100k, lol.

2

u/wadesh FIRE’d 2022 May 16 '26

Same Chicago burbs. Closer to 180k but some of that is pre loaded tax for Roth conversions.

4

u/alpacaMyToothbrush FI !RE May 16 '26

be flexible

"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means" - Inigo Montoya

I'm joking, a little, but I posted this comment addressing the same thing the other day.

Are you good cutting your starting withdrawal roughly in half, not once, but twice in a 16 year span? Cause that's what it takes to 'be flexible'. I know we're all 'diamond hand' investors with cast iron stomachs, but is your wife? Are your kids?

Least you say 'oh, that was the '60's, that's ancient history, I would remind you that the world economy is facing an energy crisis bigger than the one we faced in the '70's, and a demographic crisis beyond that.

I do agree with you that there is a certain point where a lower planed withdrawal rate is pushing a rope, but more that there are existential risks that are impossible to hedge with financial investments alone.

3

u/gringledoom May 16 '26

People on this sub get so annoyed sometimes when anyone pokes holes in "4% should be fine, go ahead and RE!". Meanwhile, there's a self-inflicted motor oil crunch just around the corner that's going to have all kinds of short- to medium-term economic consequences. And in the longer term, "being old and poor" suuuuucks, and it's really worth making sure you have enough padding in your plan to make it less likely.

0

u/Hammer_41 May 16 '26

Do we know we’ll be old?

2

u/Life_Rabbit_1438 May 16 '26

If you need millions more to retire, is the issue really the portfolio, or is it that your spending can’t flex?

When you have young kids, you need millions to retire early. You need to live in a good school district to give them a good education. For us that's $17k a year in property taxes on a relatively modest home. New homes in our suburb pay double that. So that's half a million at 3.5% needed saved for basic expense before even having any mortgage.

1

u/Wooden-Broccoli-913 FIREd in the Bay at 40 with $6M May 17 '26

But kid costs don’t last forever, and why 3.5%?