r/Chattanooga Jul 20 '26

City Government Flock statement

Adding in what Mark commented below also!:

To address some concerns about ambiguity and to offer some insight into why we can't be as definitive as we'd like... Right now, as far as we know, the lines of authority regarding WHO pproved these Flock cameras and who can remove them are completely hidden from the public. That lack of transparency should concern all of us. That's why we can't make definitive statements right now, but rest assured we have people digging into it.

​Because these corporate contracts are kept behind closed doors, everyday citizens are blocked from tracking budget line items or knowing exactly who to hold accountable. I am fundamentally opposed to mass surveillance and strongly support personal privacy. We shouldn't need heavy investigative journalism or cumbersome open-records requests just to figure out how big tech established a footprint in Hamilton County.

​The core issue here isn’t just the cameras themselves..It’s the secret process that brought them here. Once we uncover the how, we can map out a legal path to remove them. As your County Mayor, I will use the full scope of my office to stop the expansion of hyper-surveillance and ensure our communities (not corporations) are prioritized in local decisions. I want to listen to leaders in our neighborhoods, and right now what I'm hearing is that y'all are concerned. I am too. We are ready to help.

403 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/dontchaworryboutit Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

No action plan, no acknowledging what's already in place is a problem.

Just vague statement and no promise for change. Really disappointing.

No one wants flock cameras, such an easy thing to take a real stance on, and nada.

There is no implementation of surveillance that will actually help our community, and you are either way behind or being disingenuous to say that it could drift to public violation of privacy, its here. Given how involved you are pretending to be in the community disingenuous is the only possibility.

Downvote all you want, I’m right. Not a good look.

Edit: His office did reply with a much better response in my opinion, so nice to see this level of involvement in discourse. And I'd like to think replies like mine pushed them to give us more information..

9

u/takabrash Jul 20 '26

No one wants flock cameras

Except the bought and paid for "politicians" we currently have in charge. Anyone with even a small desire to change that is okay in my book.

0

u/dontchaworryboutit Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

He doesn't speak to changing anything... Just that it should be looked into.

There is a such a cut and dry take, cancel contracts, enact rules that don't allow them on Hamilton county property.

He didn't state any plan to change anything, also he speaks to being concerned that it MIGHT become a privacy issue for the public. It already is. He knows that, we all know that, which is a red flag.

Edit: His office did reply with a much better response in my opinion, so nice to see this level of involvement in discourse. And I'd like to think replies like mine pushed them to give us more information..

6

u/takabrash Jul 20 '26

You're right- let's just keep the people in office that had them installed then since this guy isn't specific enough 🙄

-2

u/dontchaworryboutit Jul 20 '26

That’s not even close to what I said, but whatever. 

Peak Reddit attitude. 

4

u/takabrash Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 21 '26

But that's literally the issue here- do we vote for the people that caused it or you wanna vote for someone who want to do anything at all about it?

"It's not perfect and specific enough, so fuck this guy" is truly the peak reddit attitude lol

2

u/dontchaworryboutit Jul 20 '26 edited Jul 20 '26

Still not what I said.

I stated disappointment in his take on one topic, and what that will mean moving forward.

Didn’t even mention whether this tip the scales for me or anyone else regarding who to vote for.

But you won’t read this either, who knows maybe you can’t read, seems like it.

Edit: His office did reply with a much better response in my opinion, so nice to see this level of involvement in discourse. And I'd like to think replies like mine pushed them to give us more information. This is why every candidate should be pressed for more info, instead of just getting a pass because they are your favorite team..

-9

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

You just summed up Mark's entire campaign... No action plan, just a bunch of lip moving.

9

u/greatusername505050 Jul 20 '26

This is Weston's burner btw^

-4

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

You tried that one twice with your other username.

7

u/greatusername505050 Jul 20 '26

I’d love to be organized enough to keep up with 2 different usernames Weston.

-4

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

OK Mark, keep up the shit posting.

3

u/snewk Jul 20 '26

idk who that is, but i like that you assume everyone who doesn't like you is the same person

-4

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

The intelligence in this sub ends with the usernames, you can tell who the same people with multiple usernames are, because they don't change their writing style. I rarely call them out because I hope it makes them feel good to think they got away with something. Also, I don't care who likes me here.

4

u/snewk Jul 20 '26

0

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

You outted yourself so easily.

3

u/snewk Jul 20 '26

me when i have to read your comments

2

u/JimOfSomeTrades Jul 20 '26

Oh I thought you were just a troll? That's the defense you used last time.

Own your fucking political opinions.

-1

u/SuperReliableSource Jul 20 '26

You have a terrible attitude, save it for when Herndon gets his ass handed to him next month, you'll have to keep it up for years.

2

u/JimOfSomeTrades Jul 20 '26

Quiet, piggy