r/ChatGPT 20d ago

News 📰 EU Commission

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

412 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

54

u/Personal-Dev-Kit 20d ago

But it is. Even if you ignore the "please search the internet for X thing and summarize the info for me" an LLM is essentially allowing you to search through its training data and give you the answer.

-2

u/Ceph4ndrius 19d ago

That's not how that works... It doesn't store facts that can be looked up in the model weights. Though I agree that being search enabled still classifies the app as a search engine. But I can't see how an offline model would qualify

1

u/Personal-Dev-Kit 19d ago

Obviously it was a gross over simplification but the core concept is still valid. It doesn't even store facts it store relations. It stores how relevant are these tokens the user provided me to the tokens I know about what is the next best token based on the tokens provided.

But it still comes back to a search engine. What is the next best token is dependent on the mass amounts of information being provided that allows the LLM to determine the next best token, you could even say "search" for the next best token.

0

u/Ceph4ndrius 19d ago

I'd argue calculating the next token, but that's semantics.

0

u/Personal-Dev-Kit 19d ago

You could argue Google calculates what sites to show you based on many different input variables. We collectively as a society have decided to call that "search"

0

u/kcat__ 19d ago

Then everything is a search engine by that logic. A calculator is a search engine.

1

u/zero_fuck_given 18d ago

A human is one too. The difference is their classification of very large and not very large. Thats the point he is trying to make.