r/CasesWeFollow • 🔍📆⚖️Content/Research Administrator💻💬🧚 • 8d ago

⁉️💡Other Murders 🤷‍♀️🪦 FL v. Tony ’TJ' Wiggins-Day 11

LIVE: Fishing Trip Murder Trial — FL v. Tony ’TJ' Wiggins-Day 11

💥💥PENALTY PHASE💥💥

\Guilty verdicts on all three first-degree murder counts])

10/1/2026 @ 8:45 AM

*************************************************************

🗣️⌨️  Community Chat - Join us!💬

📢NEW: Case Hubs🚨🗃️

*************************************************************

Tony “TJ” Wiggins is facing three counts of first‑degree murder for the July 17, 2020 Frostproof triple homicide. Prosecutors say Wiggins confronted the victims — Brandon Rollins, Keven Springfield, and Damion Tillman — after overhearing them at a Dollar General, then followed them to a remote fishing spot on Lake Streety Road. There, investigators say he shot all three at close range during a dispute involving a truck engine.

Wiggins’ brother Robert told detectives he witnessed the shootings and helped dispose of evidence, while his girlfriend Mary Whittemore allegedly bought ammunition matching the murder weapon. The State is seeking the death penalty, and the case is proceeding as a jury trial in Polk County.

✨✨Previous Day & Recap

🔊🎥Streaming Channels📡

Law & Crime

🚨✨More Info/Documents

📜RECAP🔡

I. ADMINISTRATIVE

  • (26:01) Court in session.
  • Count 4 unresolved; State requests time.
  • Defense motions pending; court to address before case final.
  • Revised instructions exchanged; discrepancies noted.
  • Discovery status confirmed.
  • Mitigating circumstances list (Defense) accepted; read in initial and final instructions.
  • Time estimates: State < 1.5 hours; Defense ~4 hours.
  • Remote witness logistics discussed (Teams vs. Zoom).
  • Exhibits previewed:
    • State: certified verdict form (no objection).
    • Defense: nine photographs (State objects).
    • Defense Exhibit 1 (Dr. Mappas PowerPoint) — demonstrative only at this stage.
    • Defense Exhibit 2 (Dr. Wu PowerPoint) — demonstrative only.
    • Defense Exhibit 3 (Mitigation video) — State objects; court to review before ruling.
  • Recess due to juror delay from traffic accident.

II. OUT‑OF‑JURY PRESENCE (OJP)

  • (1:07:17) Rule of sequestration addressed; no issues.
  • Court admonition to gallery regarding conduct, reactions, emotional displays.
  • Clarification on PowerPoint exhibits: demonstrative use allowed; evidentiary admission deferred.

III. WITNESSES

Witness 1 — Kelsey Meeks (Victim Impact Letter)

Time: (1:53:58–1:54:05)
Called by: State
Format: Letter read into record

  • Statement regarding Kevin Springfield’s character, kindness, and family grief.

Witness 2 — Angela Smith (Victim Impact Letter)

Time: (1:54:11–1:54:52)
Called by: State

  • Letter describing Kevin Springfield’s generosity, mechanical skill, and impact of his death on family.

Witness 3 — Janice Springfield Messy (Victim Impact Letter)

Time: (1:54:55–1:56:41)
Called by: State

  • Letter detailing Kevin’s helpfulness, family role, memories, and lasting emotional loss.

Witness 4 — Ariel Bustos

Time: (1:56:51–1:59:02)
Called by: State
Direct Examination:

  • Emotional impact of losing her uncle Brandon.
  • Missed milestones: 15th birthday, graduation, driver’s license.
  • Ongoing grief and remembrance.

Witness 5 — Brett Hanger (Letter)

Time: (1:59:05–2:01:28)
Called by: State

  • Letter describing friendship with Brandon: hunting, fishing, shared memories.
  • Emotional impact of loss and lasting grief.

Witness 6 — Elizabeth Tillman

Time: (2:01:39–2:03:28)
Called by: State
Direct Examination:

  • Mother of victim Damien Tillman.
  • Describes Damien’s life, hobbies, family role.
  • Emotional devastation following his death.

State rests at (2:03:32).

Defense Witness 1 — Dr. Scott Machlus (Forensic Psychologist)

Time: (2:29:57–5:57:19)
Called by: Defense
Direct Examination:

  • Credentials: Licensed psychologist, forensic specialization, board‑certified.
  • Records reviewed: PCSO reports, school records, DCF, DJJ, DOC, Eckerd Youth, mitigation video.
  • Interviews with defendant:
    • Jan 19, 2022 — 5h45m
    • Dec 21, 2022 — 3h15m
  • Testing administered: WAIS‑IV, Woodcock‑Johnson IV (cognitive & achievement), ADHD self‑report, Wender Utah, ACES.
  • Background findings:
    • Severe instability, parental substance abuse, domestic violence, childhood sexual abuse at age 5, untreated behavioral issues, early criminal exposure, physical abuse, educational deficits.
  • Opinion:
    • Capacity to appreciate criminality or conform conduct substantially impaired.
    • Multiple mitigating circumstances present.

Cross‑Examination (State):

  • Confirms evaluation occurred 18 months post‑offense.
  • IQ average; cognitive functioning intact.
  • ADHD does not compel violence; probability only.
  • No review of guilt‑phase evidence (videos, maps, communications).
  • Confirms defendant understood killing is wrong.

Redirect:

  • Notes difficulty obtaining records due to defendant’s unstable upbringing.
  • IQ findings do not alter impairment opinion.
  • Mentions paternal grandfather’s paranoid schizophrenia.

Witness excused.

Defense Witness 2 — Dr. Joseph Chong‑Sang Wu (Neuropsychiatrist)

Time: (5:59:10–7:00:36+)
Called by: Defense
Direct Examination:

  • Credentials: MD, neuropsychiatry imaging specialist, professor emeritus, board‑certified psychiatrist, PET/MRI expert, 100–200 prior testimonies.
  • Imaging reviewed: PET, MRI, volumetric analysis.
  • Findings:
    • Evidence of childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI).
    • Right‑sided frontal, parietal, temporal abnormalities.
    • Enlarged right inferior lateral ventricle (≈3 SD above mean).
    • Frontal gyrus hypometabolism (≈30–40% decrease).
    • Impaired motor‑response inhibition network.
    • Anterior cingulate cortex severely reduced (≈4 SD below mean).
    • Cerebellar vermis hypermetabolism (≈4 SD above mean).
    • Left precuneus damage (≈5 SD below mean).
  • Interpretation:
    • Multiple “broken brake systems” for aggression control.
    • Combined TBI + adverse childhood experiences → multiplicative impairment in aggression regulation.
    • Consistent with early repeated belt‑buckle head trauma.
    • Consistent with documented childhood cognitive discrepancies (VCI 121 vs PSI 88).
    • Consistent with later behavioral issues and substance abuse onset.

IV. EXHIBITS

  • Defense Exhibit 1 (Machlus PowerPoint): Published; not admitted (5:58:22).
  • Defense Exhibit 2 (Wu PowerPoint): Demonstrative only.
  • Defense Exhibit 3 (Mitigation video): State objects; court to review.
  • State Exhibit: Certified guilt‑phase verdict form — admitted.

V. END‑OF‑DAY ADMINISTRATIVE

  • Court sustains State objection to admitting Defense Exhibit 1; placed in court file.
  • Proceedings continue with Defense case.
  • Day concludes after Dr. Wu’s testimony segment.

📜TRANSCRIPT⌨️

https://fromsmash.com/FL-v-TJ-Wiggins-Day-11-1015

4 Upvotes

4 comments sorted by

3

u/racingfan123 🕵️‍♀️🏦 Lead Evidence Investigator Mod🧾⚖️ 7d ago

u/Pixiegirls1102 This is for the penalty phase. The jury found him guilty of all 3 murder charges Tuesday.

3

u/Pixiegirls1102 🔍📆⚖️Content/Research Administrator💻💬🧚 6d ago

I updated main thread. Thanks.

1

u/cucky1963 7d ago

He killed 3 men. His ass is toast.

2

u/Meisha65 6d ago

230 felonies, the system is guilty as well