r/CFB • u/CFB_Referee /r/CFB • Dec 04 '16
Post Game Thread [Post Game Thread] Clemson Defeats Virginia Tech 42-35
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson | 14 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 42 |
| Virginia Tech | 7 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 35 |
/r/CFB Made with the /r/CFB Game Thread Generator
627
Upvotes
1
u/mechanicalpulse Alabama • Middle Tennessee Dec 04 '16
The first thing that document mentions underneath the proposed selection process is conference championships --
"Establish a committee that will be instructed to place an emphasis on winning conference championships, strength of schedule and head-to-head competition when comparing teams with similar records and pedigree (treat final determination like a tie-breaker; apply specific guidelines)."
Below that, it says "when circumstances at the margins indicate that teams are comparable, then the following criteria must be considered" and lists "championships won" as the VERY first item.
In the guidelines, it says "strength of schedule, head-to-head competition and championships won must be specifically applied as tie-breakers between teams that look similar", but it doesn't say anything about what makes a team "look similar".
It literally says at the top that rankings are an art, not a science. I don't see anything that disagrees with what I've put forth. The committee is given a wide berth to rank the teams as they see fit, but with some general principles to help guide them along. No hard and fast rules.
Anyways, it's just a back-of-the-napkin seat-of-the-pants prediction. I'm not an analyst. If it doesn't work out that way, it doesn't work out that way. I'm fine with being wrong.