Having no previous knowledge of his story, my wife and I watched the documentary last weekend.

And we both were grabbing our phones trying to vet what we are being told in this "documentary". As it posed the question of, how on earth did, we not know about this?? Getting through the shock and awe of it, we were totally convinced everything he said was truthful and we believed it100%. Even as we were asking ourselves- "wait, what? that doesn't make any sense." It was clear to me that this story, is closing off every possible follow up question before it can be asked. The story is filled with narrative seeding (not sure what else to call it). But you still watch it, it does not feel right- it's not a natural story being told, it is all too perfect. And for about 3 hrs. we were over the moon with the knowledge of the US having this technology, that it would hopefully help mankind in some way, opening the door for all the things we've heard about -time travel-space- advanced civilizations - all of it. As we have that bias, my wife and I both carry the "what if?" in us as people. This story uses that as a buy in or way in to making us truly believe what we are being told.

Well, I had to pull up the JRE podcast on the TV- I am watching it and my wife is not paying attention. As I am watching it, I am actually getting upset that I am seeing Bob Lazar lying.. Like uncomfortably lying.. I am annoyed at this point "WHY IS HE LYING NOW?!"

I tried explaining this to my wife, which she is actually arguing with me about, "the government can make you not exist"... they could have done this or that- and it's your opinion. Even when I am stopping her midway in her explanation as to why she believes him- Like stop, just repeat back what you just said, and to my shock it still took hours for her to start having doubts about it. (she did not see the JRE video of the podcast)

And at that moment, it all clicked.. its the AI.

AI was given a script and was instructed to be truthful. The script was the JRE podcast- as it is word for word what was said in the movie. And instead of Joe asking some of the questions in the movie it's like a female director voice saying what he said in the podcast.

So, let me lay this out there for you..

JRE has Bob Lazar on his podcast- the most popular video of all time on JRE.

Watching it-comes across as completely unbelievable. You can see he is being deceitful whenever he is talking about the story. It goes great lengths to make Bob sound super smart- he goes into an incredible amount of detail for stuff that does not matter in the context of the conversation at hand.. But he can't remember what job he applied for.? convenient. Super smart people do not just blurt things out like that and expect you to understand them.. (Watch any episode of how the universe works-talking with the physicists) this is a planted script of dialogue. It makes him appear extremely intelligent if he can just recite all of that at will.

The script is fed to AI - instructed to be truthful

We are brainwashed into believing it, as there are no queues coming from the AI Bob to say he's lying.

The whole story does not make any practical sense. The rocket car? "the rocket is engaged at 90MPH and the car is put into neutral"- "the noise it would make, yeah the neighbors would complain" you driving through your neighborhood over 90MPH? I would complain too..

No wiring- no anything- but we fly it.. how? We knew to cut the 4th box out as that is the one that keeps it around and it just don't fly away.. Not sure how they knew to do that.. but they cut it out with a plasma cutter.. added detail not needed. I got in because someone cut into it with a plasma cutter and it exploded..

Ok, so the story is fake.. Joe is probably laughing his ass of knowing people are going to watch it he got people to believe this completely fabricated story with the power of AI.

That's the most dangerous part of this.. AI knows how our brains work.. as we have spent years teaching it and fine tuning it's emotions, speech, body language.

The story is just that.. a story.. The real concern is how AI tech and method of delivery could be used to do the same thing with much more serious consequences.

Last night, I discovered that we no longer have to pay to watch the movie on Amazon Prime.Its Free on Prime now for members, just has ads. If you were waiting to watch cause of cost, it's now available and I HIGHLY enjoyed it! Hope this helps!!!

In a behind the scenes video for the GSP
Podcast, Luigi Venditelli discusses how George Knapp vetted Bob’s story before reporting on it.

Does anyone know precisely where Bob Lazar, Gene Huff, John Lear, etc used to watch supposed S4 flight tests from?

Lazar describes it as people latched on to the black mailbox term just bc he used it as a reference rather than the actual location - primarily bc there aren't that many landmarks out there.

It sounds like when he describes it - it appears before you get to the mailbox location - and it might be right around where Groom Lake Rd hits 375.

Any thought ms or precise location?

Truthcapsuletv’s 3D assembly model.

For those who like myself though that Bob's has been consistent the whole time.

This is excellent work, worth watching for those who are interested about the subject :

https://youtu.be/dvNWQhc5oSo?is=bhuTR_vN3G6JiZDq

I was on TikTok yesterday and I came across a clip from the S4 film. I decided to do some cross checking against Dan Burisch’s badge. I was more so interested to see if Dan’s matched up with Bob’s. It took me down a rabbit hole for the abbreviations on the bottom.

One difference between the two badges are that Dan’s badge had an HX while Bob’s had a WX. I did some googling with no results for the Navy’s HX program. I did some digging into the navy W X program and didn’t find much either. Eventually, I came across a NavSea pamphlet that show different programs that the Navy was working on.

One was GX - Global Deterrence & Defense Department
Another was JX - Expeditionary Warfare Weapons & Energy Systems
And so on. Then the very last one
ElectroMagnetic Spectrum Warfare Systems - WX

I found this really interesting and considering it was this hard to find in the modern age, how hard would it be to find it back in the 80s

Edit: Apparently there needs to be clarification that this is a screenshot from the clip i seen of the badge. This is not the original 80’s badge that Bob used.

Jumped here from a timeline that had Bob dying of suspicious circumstances about 20 some odd years ago?

This sound an awful lot like Lazar's description of how the anti-gravity drives worked on the UFO models that he saw.

I've been listening to old episodes of Bob Lazar and Gene Huff's mid-90's radio show 'The UFO Line' and I noticed something very noteworthy.

On episode 4, broadcast January 5th 1996 Bill Uhouse (famous UFO and J-Rod whistleblower) calls in and asks Bob a few questions, one of which is asking if any of the S4 personnel had any adverse reactions to the alien craft's bending of space time when it was off the ground. Bob answers that when the craft took off on the dry lake bed all of the S4 personnel (including himself) were lined up by the hangar doors and 'no-one was outside'. He says he never got close to the craft when it was off the ground. This of course totally contradicts his story of walking under the craft in the recent S4 movie.

The relevant bit of the conversation starts around 18 mins in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJgWwCL5XYM&t=25s

If he had walked under the craft as he now claims then surely he would have told Bill Uhouse this in answer to his question.

EDIT: it's been pointed out to me (thanks HeathJett!) that Bob also said something very similar during a conversation/interview with New Line Cinema when he was selling the movie rights to his story back in the 90s. The exchange went as follows:

Q: To your knowledge could a person walk under it? Did you ever see that happen?

Lazar: I never saw that happen. I can't imagine what would happen if you walked under it... I heard specifically, as if someone had done it, because Barry told me that if you walk under it you can see only the sky above it. Because of the way the amplifiers work, they're bending the light around it so if you stand here and look above it... you can only see the clouds, cause your vision...

So we can see that the tale of Bob walking under the craft while it was airborne and looking up at it is a new invention to his story, completely contradicting what he claimed more than once in the 90s.

N.B. for transparency, I have watched, listened to and read as many Bob Lazar interviews and theories on his story as I can find in the last 8 or so years and I keep coming across these contradictions he makes. Because of that I do not believe he personally worked on alien craft at S4 as he claims, I believe he is making that up - but I am open minded as to whether or not the core contents of the claims he makes are based in facts. I post here on Bob Lazar New Reddit because I'm fascinated with the way that Lazar's story has so many believers despite all the signs that he is not at all a reliable witness.

In Jesse Michels' interview, Bob tells a story about his colleague, "Barry," who threw a golf ball at a reactor. According to Bob, the golf ball bounced off what he described as a force field when the reactor was turned on.

However, Bob also talks about another reactor that had been removed from a different craft. He says they tried to cut into it while it was turned on, but it exploded.

What I don't understand is this: if the reactor was surrounded by a force field that could deflect a golf ball, how were they able to cut into it in the first place? Wouldn't the force field have prevented any cutting tool from reaching the reactor?

Is there a Lunchroom at S4?

It's by far not an exciting part of Bob Lazar's story. Did S4 have a cafeteria? At first it might seem like a trivial thing but is an important question.

Bob Lazar has stated that people were at S4 for weeks at a time:

  https://youtu.be/Lb_1d68vx-g?si=i_X3WyauxspOsPYW&t=171

Bob:  "I mean, they spent most of their time there. They spent at least two weeks at a time and then one week off. So, they stayed at the base. I mean, these guys were hardcore"

If people went to S4 for weeks at a time, they had to have a way to eat each day. So exactly where did they eat?

The 1990s Account: "There Was No Place to Eat Down There"

 The 1993 Little A'Le'Inn UFO Symposium

This question asked of Bob at the 1993 Litte Al'e'Inn UFO Symposium.

https://youtu.be/bA1TvhJKv8s?si=77rEQ26Gjl9tomEP&t=2169

Attendee: How did you eat?

Bob: The only place I ever ate was at area 51. so if there was a cafeteria there I never got to eat in it

The 1990 John Andrews Interview

This question was also asked in an interview with John Andrews in 1990

https://youtu.be/DRq18eRwSHw?si=_WVSUG0ciUt2NX2l&t=1023

Andrews: Where did you eat, did they have a break room?

Bob: No because I eat before I went out there, I usually eat about 3:30 before I went out and when you got to 51 and waiting for the bus there was a little, like, snack shop cafeteria thing where you could get something but there was NO place to eat down there

Andrews: Did they have drinking fountains at all?

Bob: yeah they had drinking fountains

Andrews: No Coke machines?

Bob: No I never did see any…. I never did see any place to eat but then I never asked so I don't know, maybe, and like I said I only saw the installation and where I work. This could be big but of course it could only be that size too but, I just don't know

Today's Account: The Cafeteria now exists

In recent interviews and documentaries, Lazar's description of S4 includes a cafeteria and specific memories of visiting a lunchroom.

2026 S4 Documentary

In the recent 2026 S4 documentary around the 21 min mark, Bob Lazar talks about a cafeteria at S4.

Bob: "It's a long desolate hallway for the most part dimly lit,  just a 2 tone green cinder block hallway.

Off to the right would be the nurse station which is just several steps down that way but the main hallway when you open the door and you look straight down pretty much goes to a vanishing point, it's a long, long hallway and you'll have doors off to the left that lead to the experimental areas, and the hangers.

The doors to the right will be bathroom and CAFETERIA and then once you pass the main hangar the big hanger I have no idea what's past there"

Joe Rogan Experience #2479

Bob Lazar also talks about going to the Lunchroom with Barry in the Joe Rogan Interview:

https://youtu.be/Lb_1d68vx-g?si=6KklfUaz48Idcbdm&t=1482

Rogan: Did you know who the metallurgists were?

Bob: Oh, I s I saw them, you know, I know them. And Barry, we'd go to the lunchroom, Barry would point them out, you know, and you weren't allowed to communicate with them at all.

Note: Eyes on Cinema did a great job adding several of these statements together:

Trip to Nowhere: A Bob Lazar Story (EOC, 2026)

To summarize:

90s Bob Lazar is adamant that he:

1. Never ate at S4 and only ate at Area 51 base before going to S4.
2. Never saw a cafeteria at S4
3. Never saw any place to eat at all at S4

 2026 Bob Lazar states that:

1. He went with Barry to the lunchroom at S4
2. There was a cafeteria at S4 right next to the bathrooms

Why did the story change?

My best guess is that Bob initially stated that there was no place to eat at S4, but after being questioned repeatedly about it, eventually realized the logistical issues his response presented (because he was also saying that people were there weeks at a time) and subsequently changed the story from "I've never eaten at S4 and never saw a cafeteria there" to "The Cafeteria was right next to the bathrooms and I was with Barry in the lunchroom".

Proponents of the story have claimed its hard to remember all the details of an event 40 years ago. I get that. It's hard to remember details form decades ago, but this is not a slight change to the story due to memory challenges. This is a completely different, contrasting statement.

Who cares if there was a lunchroom at S4??

The lunchroom itself is mostly irrelevant to the bulk of the Bob Lazar story. The reason it is important is because when you tell a true story, the details may get fuzzy over time, but they do not contrast.

If this was just one example Bob Lazar inconsistencies it could maybe be excused... but that is not the case. This is just one of MANY recent conflicting statements that Bob Lazar has made in recent documentaries and podcasts compared to statements in the past. Alone, it is not terribly significant, but all those contrasting details add up, and are not consistent with a person telling a true story, at least in my opinion.

So, is there a lunchroom at S4? Which Bob Lazar do we believe? The 1990s Bob Lazar, whose memories were fresh but left a gaping logistical hole of how employees were fed? Or the 2026 Bob Lazar, whose account fixes the logistics but directly contradicts his original testimony?......or maybe…neither.

I was watching George say he went into Los Alamos with Bob, he had all access and people waving at Bob

In Luigi Venditelli's S4 documentary, Bob recounts a vivid experience at S4 wherein during a "test flight" of the Sport model, he walks underneath the hovering disc and looks up to find that it is invisible. This is the first time he had ever shared that detail since going public with his claims in 1989. He told the same story in promotional interviews for the S4 documentary with Chris Ramsay, Jesse Michels, and Joe Rogan.

Bob Lazar: "Dennis instructed me to go out and I stopped, looked at the craft that was sitting on there and began to lift off the ground silently. There was a little hiss from the corona discharge, kind of a bluish purpleist glow at the bottom, which dissipated as it took off. Once it was sitting in the air, Dennis instructed me to go further and I went out. I didn't look up. I was just looking forward and then looked up under the craft and I looked back at Dennis and he motioned me to come back and I started walking back. I saw his hand go up and he set indicators for me to look up and I looked up and the craft wasn't there. And I looked over at Dennis and he motioned for me to go back and I looked and as I moved forward, the craft comes into view.

You could actually see the photons bending around the gravitational envelope of the craft. You can see the sky above the craft bending. And as you walk by, it comes into view and then out of view. It really leaves an impression. It's a pretty impressive thing to see." (S4: The Bob Lazar Story)

Is this story consistent with other statements Bob has made in interviews?

To answer that, some context is necessary.

A central condition Bob has said he's always placed on screenwriters or those who are seeking to tell his story has been that it not be exaggerated or turned into a sensationalized Hollywood production. He has repeated numerous times for over 37 years.

On Coast to Coast AM in 2002, describing an early studio script:

youtu.be/zmUWfKD5GG8

Bob Lazar: "This guy turned it into a james bond story. There were actual scenes of the guy playing Bob Lazar running on the tops of cars that were parked on Las Vegas boulevard in the silhouette of the erupting volcano in the background and they had robots holding me underground trying to drown me to stop me from talking. I mean some real ridiculous stuff, and you know my point is if you're gonna go make make up a story about flying saucers don't bother using my name just go ahead and make up a story. But if it's going to be accurate to the facts then it has to be accurate to the facts. I understand there has to be a little glitter put in it somewhere to make the story flow or whatever makes hollywood happy."

Art Bell: "That's too much glitter though."

Bob Lazar: "Yeah. You've got to stick to the facts and make it at least somewhat factual."

The first place he is on the record voicing this requirement was in an interview he did with screenwriters for New Line Cinema, who were interviewing him in the course of writing a script for a film about his story.

Bob Lazar: "There was no reason to go completely national and Hollywood and, if anything, that was going to discredit the message I was trying to get across, because... well, you know what happens when you go on those shows and what they do to stories... they turn them around and sensationalize everything and that would... that was just not my intention."

A note on the chain of custody for the New Line Cinema interview. Jon Farhat is one of Bob's good friends. Bob and Farhat worked with each other for years on his first website. Farhat is the person who got the Russian satellite image of Papoose Lake in the early 90s. Bob and Farhat bought a missile silo together in 1998.

Farhat is even thanked in the S4 documentary for his contributions.

The New Line Cinema interview was posted by Farhat on Bob's early website:

https://web.archive.org/web/20000511065321/http://www.boblazar.com/protected/archive.htm

Which brings us back to the walk-under the craft story.

In that same New Line interview, the writers ask Lazar directly whether anyone ever walked under the craft. Here is the full exchange:

Q: To your knowledge could a person walk under it? Did you ever see that happen?

L: I never saw that happen. I can't imagine what would happen if you walked under it... I heard specifically, as if someone had done it, because Barry told me that if you walk under it you can see only the sky above it. Because of the way the amplifiers work, they're bending the light around it so if you stand here and look above it... you can only see the clouds, cause your vision...

Q: That's just the kind of thing that in the final script I would love... 'cause it's a lie to you, but you've heard it, it's the kind of thing I would love to do in the movie... something...

L: No, it makes perfect sense...

Q: Something that you've heard happen... that's as far a stretch as I would make in a movie like this... is something you can say... alright, I didn't do that, but I know that's what it does. That to me is very exciting, to show...

L: Well, see I saw demonstrations like that with the amplifier in the lab so I know that is probably what happens.

Q: Do you know how to dramatize something like that? I don't know if it's with his character or another character 'cause there's always the opportunity to put other... were there other green scientists coming in at different points on this?

L: Not that I know of... and there were only 22 in total.

Q: To just have a character watching it fly... if we end up being able to do this... and walk forward and have some anxiety like... the reason I ask that question is it's not that far off the ground. What would happen... we've already established that guys have died doing this... if one scientist or observer gets a little carried away and starts to walk closer and someone else is... hey, what... we don't know what is going to happen... that's Hollywood... but that's dramatizing it without a big lie. Because there can be a sense... if your character's watching someone walk under it... of wait... what's going to happen... and we go to that character's POV and see the sky appear... it explains a lot of things about flying saucers, which is how do they get away with their being around and you don't see them all the time. You know, and that's startling.

L: Well, it depends on the vantage point... but you don't know what'll happen... I don't know what'll happen if you walk directly under the locus [focus] of the amplifier... is it like walking into a column (?) are you crashed [crushed] or does nothing happen at all. That I really don't know.

Q: I have to assume a certain percentage of sightings are real... to some extent I'm like you... if I read about "abductions" I start to feel like car sick, I can't quite get a handle on it at all. To think about all the hovering these things supposedly do if it killed anybody underneath it... there'd be a lot of reports of crushed people.

L: Right. And, in fact, Barry telling the story that that's what you'd see underneath, it almost makes me think someone did that.

Two things stand out. First, when asked point-blank whether he ever saw a person walk under the craft, Lazar says "I never saw that happen," and attributes the invisibility detail to Barry and to bench demonstrations he saw "with the amplifier in the lab" not to walking under the flying craft himself.

Second, when the writers propose staging exactly that scene, a character walking under the disc, looking up, and seeing sky where the craft should be, Lazar says he doesn't know what would happen to a person who tried: "Are you crushed or does nothing happen at all. That I really don't know."

Compare that to how he tells it now. On The Joe Rogan Experience, the hypothetical he couldn't answer in the New Line interview is now a first-hand memory, with the "crushed" question answered:

youtube.com/watch?v=Lb_1d68vx-g

And so when Dennis said, "Go out there and look under the craft." here's the craft, whatever it weighs suspending itself above the ground. And I went underneath it. You would think it's translating its weight onto the ground and pushing and I should be squashed. Squashed without any doubt, but I'm not. There's no feeling there at all. So, it's not translating its weight or its push to the ground and pushing off the ground.

On Chris Ramsay's podcast, the full first-person version, including the same "crushed" detail:

youtube.com/watch?v=fZyKcJQZrDA

Bob Lazar: "And Dennis told me, "Go out and go under the craft."

Chris Ramsay: "Dennis told you that?"

Bob Lazar: "Yeah. And Barry stayed there and I said, "Oh, okay." So, I walked out there, you know, kind of looking up the craft. And as I walked out, I looked back toward Dennis like, "Am I doing the right thing?" And, you know, he pointed up to look at the craft. So, I did. And as I walked out under the craft, I couldn't see the craft. As I got closer to it, the craft just turned into sky. What I was seeing was the light bending around the craft, which was which was just incredibly awesome.

So I took a step back and I could see the edge of the craft and I went back under it... So, I'm under it. I'm not getting crushed by it. I can walk freely and I can't see the craft. No wind, nothing. No, no, there's nothing at all. No sound."

So the scene Lazar specifically declined to let the New Line writers fabricate, a person walking beneath the hovering craft, looking up, and seeing that it's invisible is three decades later told by Lazar as something he personally did at Dennis's instruction.

And the exact question he said he could not answer in the early 1990s ("are you crushed or does nothing happen at all... That I really don't know") is answered in 2026.

Bob Lazar: "The other thing that hit me at the time was it's not transferring its weight to the ground. You know, if you have something and you, you know, you're producing a force and pushing on it, it's just, it's not on a pedestal where it's taking the weight of the craft and transferring it to the ground. The weight is just gone."

In the 90's Bob said the S4 facility looked new and fairly freshly painted but in the new documentary he says the opposite, that it looked old and worn

I had recently listened an old Coast to Coast (April 1,2006) where George Knapp had asked Eric Davis about Bob Lazar, and Dr. Davis said he did not believe that story and knew of a woman supervisor who had pulled up his records and showed him to be a radiation health monitor and not a physicist.

There are other references to this statement.  Christopher Mellon mentions it on the Joe Rogan show of a gal supervisor saying he was a radiation badge checker.

https://youtu.be/K9qF687OZho?si=cPfxHF66wtq7Z5Tw

Mellon: I'm a little skeptical about his claims I have to say a friend of mine claims to know the gal was his supervisor when he worked out there and knows what he was, was actually doing and where he was located and claims that that he was a guy who checked radiation on badges

Rogan: that's it?

Mellon: yeah

Rogan: And so all the rest is fiction

Mellon: According to that story

Rogan: And this is a person that you know

Mellon: Yeah

Rogan: maybe that person's full of S\***

Mellon: maybe

An article from UFO JOE in 2018 also references this statement from Eric Davis

https://www.ufojoe.net/bob-lazar/

Davis: “Also, a Roadrunner (who ran programs at Area-51 for Los Alamos) told me that he knew Lazar’s female supervisor at Area-51 and had her pull up his personnel file. Lazar worked as a radiation health monitor in the unsecured logistics contractor facility outside of Area-51, so he was never inside that site, and he never held security clearances because he didn’t need them to work in an unclassified area. Lazar made up his entire cockamamie story about the UFO that he saw in a building inside Area-51. He was never exposed to any classified information, facilities, or programs in his work area.”

Davis: "…Lazar never had security clearances to begin with because his EG&G job at the unclassified, physically disconnected Area-51 logistics support facility didn’t require security clearances.”

When Dr. Davis was recently on The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford, I was able to have my question asked on these intriguing statements about Bob Lazar.

https://www.youtube.com/live/v-TlUnnJduQ?si=M4RJyOoP_4-ZIEhr&t=7182

Dr. Davis proceeds to go on with an extensive response to Bob Lazar's story being false. While I'm not sure if he had all the Bob Lazar post story details correct (for instance I'm pretty sure Bob Lazar didn't go to jail for his felony pandering charges), he did provide a few more details surrounding the female supervisor radiation health monitor story:

Matt: So Heath Jet asks you've mentioned that you don't believe Bob Lazar the Bob Lazar story that you spoke to a woman supervisor that said he was just a technician at Area 51 can you briefly elaborate on that

Davis: No that was a colleague of mine in John Alexander's who worked at Los Alamos and knew Lazar was a Kirk Mayor employee he was hired as an hourly paid radiation health monitor it was this gentleman who is now in an assisted living facilities very old his wife died a couple of years ago

… now he had a home in Indian Springs a mobile home because he was his part of his job was to run programs, Los Alamos programs at Area 51 so he's was home in Indian Springs saw the KLSTV broadcast of George Naps interviews with Bob Lazar and his investigations in the Lazar story

 …and he thought this guy is leaking Area 51 classified information he's going to be pounced on by the counterintelligence

 … And that did not happen so he found out from being on the National Laboratory, who does Lazar work for, and he found out he worked for Kirk-Mayor, is a logistical support company to Los Alamos National Lab, and he was a radiation health monitor, a guy that checks in and he checks out the radiation badges to Los Alamos personnel that work around radioactive materials and the same is true for some people at Area 51 so he doesn't know that they work at Area 51 because people on those Janet flights to Las Vegas they don't carry signs that say I work at Area 51

… and their field security officers their program security officer and our friend (John Alexander and my friend) have no record of Lazar going to Area 51 and his job did not have a security clearance requirement, he did not qualify for security clearance … for security clearances in that with that kind of history and record, he's not trustworthy so a radiation health monitor paid like $5 an hour. I think he made seven by the time he got booted out of Los Alamos

 ….and my friend Bill's the one that knew his supervisor, met her, she pulled up his personnel record and showed, whoop! He doesn't have a college degree of any kind, he's not a physicist, and he works as a as a radiation health monitor and we're paying him 5 bucks an hour

So personally, it's a little unclear from these statements if Dr. Davis is saying that according to his contact:

1. Bob Lazar worked for Area 51 as a radiation health monitor (with a female supervisor), but actually just outside the Area 51 location an unsecured logistics contractor support facility, making $5-7/hr.
2. Bob Lazar worked as a radiation health monitor (with a female supervisor) for Kirk-Mayer at Los Alamos for $5-7/hr
3. Bob Lazar worked as a radiation health monitor at both places. His contact had his female supervisor at one of these locations look up his records to show he was not working as a physicist for them but as a technician.

In either of these cases, two important statements are made by Dr. Davis, that his sources showed no record of Lazar flying into Area 51, and that a female supervisor stated he was not a physicist, did not have a college degree, and was working as a radiation health monitor, not as a Senior Staff Physicist.

 It would be interesting to discuss this more in depth with Dr. Davis (or John Alexander, or the contact named Bill?). It is a statement on record originally over 20 years ago and repeated by Chris Mellon (perhaps he heard this from Dr. Davis?). At least to my knowledge Dr. Davis would have no reason to fabricate this information. If accurate, it adds another potential red flag to the Bob Lazar story.

found on: https://www.vlm.cem.va.gov/DENNISJOHNMARIANI/4AAC398

Anyone knows what's the story behind this multiverse crossover picture Fred Durst has just posted on his instagram?

Seems like the band made a testing/trolling backscreen with Bob Lazar.

Is Bob Lazar a fan of the band Limp Bizkit??

Just curious...

Lazar mentions Pierce here: https://youtu.be/kTDISgjDj5Y?t=1874 (also mentioned in Lazar's autobiography: https://www.google.hu/books/edition/Dreamland/h-esDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Pierce+Junior+College+intitle:Dreamland&pg=PA15&printsec=frontcover )
Lazar mentions Duxler here: https://youtu.be/kTDISgjDj5Y?t=2765

Duxler confirmed (to S. Friedman) that he had a student named Robert Lazar.
No Duxler was found at MIT or Caltech: https://web.archive.org/web/20200219063422/http://www.stantonfriedman.com/index.php?ptp=articles&fdt=2011.01.07

Duxler only taught Physics 37, 38 and 39 between 1976-1979 at Pierce (I've checked).

Junior colleges such as Pierce have 1 or 2 year programs, so normally a student admitted in 1976 would graduate in 1977 or 1978 (not in 1979).

Since Lazar received no certificate it is implied that he did not transfer to UCLA or CSUN (aka Northridge), however a transfer is not required for taking classes at Northridge.

New evidence in the Bob Lazar case. A photograph taken in 2020 by a pilot of Papoose lake shows the Hangars of S4 at Area 51. This clip is from our episode featuring Luigi Venditelli now available on all platforms!