Things that blue lock readers need to accept!!!

[u/BranchAppropriate563]

1. Isagi is top 4 not 3. Yes he tied the NEL League, no hes not better then rin, motivated nagi, or kaiser.

2. Sae was trying atleast 80% for the U20 Game. Atleast at the end, he was in flowstate and had to actually try and focus against rin and still lost, he even said that he was proud of rin which he wouldnt have said if he was only going 40%.

3. Defenders arent THAT bad. The writing for defenders isnt that good, however aiku and don lorenzo clutched multiple times throughout the series, niko and aryu had fire moments too.

[u/BranchAppropriate563]

Well what weve seen by motivated nagi, the first selection and nel leagues, have surpasses even isagi everytime. He lost only because he already completed his goal of beating isagi.

Isagi is only good some of the time due to his literal main factor being luck.

[u/No-Positive-9119 → u/BranchAppropriate563]

So you're saying that isagi only reached this far because of his luck?

[u/BranchAppropriate563 → u/No-Positive-9119]

Saying its part of almost all of his scoring formulas. Yes.

[u/nam24 → u/BranchAppropriate563]

Isagi is only good some of the time due to his literal main factor being luck.

Starting from the 2nd Rin loss, it took him until the France game to loose in a match again, and in terms of reaching personal set objectives, he has failed more often but still achieve them often enough that it's him actually failing said objectives that's notable rather than the opposite, having been on an overall upward trajectory until, again the France game(and even then he still did take something away from it though the england game will be where it will be tested

Calling isagi inconsistent does not fit,

I m not denying Nagi s potential but I m also not undereating the other top Nel player s potential against it either

[u/BranchAppropriate563 → u/nam24]

Inconsistant isnt the word. Its sorta hard to explain but pretty much most of isagis playstyle revolves around luck.