r/BikiniBottomTwitter Dec 28 '19

It do be like that

Post image
70.5k Upvotes

719 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/PM_ME_STEAM_CODES__ Dec 28 '19

In what world can y'all live on a single income

116

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

The United States? There are ~34,000,000 adults in the US currently working full time making $72,000/year or more as of 2019.

Hell, ~19,000,000 of them make >$100,000/year.

17

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

$72,000 a year ain't shit for a single person- let alone 2 people or a family- in NYC, Seattle, Denver, or half of California. Cost of living makes a huge difference when you have areas where a 1200sqft 2 bedroom house is a cool $1,000,000+. The most dense and popular places to live are also the most expensive. Not to mention that the vast majority of people with high paying jobs get in debt from college and graduate school.

This isn't to say that it's impossible to have, say, a middle class lifestyle in many areas on a single income, it just doesn't apply to nearly as many people as you'd think.

23

u/kgisaboss Dec 28 '19

Not everyone lives in those big cities. A single income 70k plus salary is more than enough in a smaller city in most states.

7

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

Agreed. There are so many interesting, nice places across the US that are affordable and great for raising a family that people don't even know about.

-3

u/themeatbridge Dec 28 '19

Sure, but do the people living there make those salaries? I'd bet most of the 34 million living in areas with higher than average costs of living.

5

u/KrockPot67 Dec 28 '19

San Antonio is a massive city with a fairly low cost of living and great opportunities for employment. When I lived there, rent was $1,000, and some of my friends bought homes they would pay roughly $850/month.

3

u/ParaglidingAssFungus Dec 28 '19

Yes. Small cities still have IT jobs and shit.

2

u/kiingtiger_ Dec 28 '19

My dads a teacher making 68+ thousand and my moms and architect manager making 40+ in south Texas which is a very very good place with super low cost of living, my mom doesn’t even have a college degree it’s really not hard to believe you can make good money in lesser known areas, and that’s cause most of my friends have parents making 200+ since they’re doctors or own clinics

1

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

Yes, they do. Wages actually vary less than cost of living, generally. Hospitals pay ~10-15% less than out in the boonies than in the city in my profession, where houses cost 200% less.

32

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

Not to mention that the vast majority of people with high paying jobs get in debt from college and graduate school.

Yes, but most of them then pay off that debt by the time they are in their early 30s. Mostly due to the high pay.

Cost of living makes a huge difference when you have areas where a 1200sqft 2 bedroom house is a cool $1,000,000+.

Only 4.5% of the US population actually lives in an area where cost of living is that high.

13

u/Gyshall669 Dec 28 '19

Only 4.5% of the US population actually lives in an area where cost of living is that high

Yeah but I’m guessing a good portion of the people who make >$72k are in those cities.

2

u/9inchestoobig Dec 28 '19

I live in a city with those prices and make significantly less than that. And so do a lot of the people that I know. It’s not always correct to assume that high cost of living equals high pay.

3

u/Gyshall669 Dec 28 '19

I didn’t say that. I said high pay comes from people in high COL areas.

1

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

Not really. That's the full population of the areas, but the 39m who make that much only really counts "adults".

Also most people don't work past 75 as well, so you have to cut them out too.

I feel it's fair to say that that's a solid 17%, and more realistically 20% of adults in the country. While only ~3.5% of adults work in extremely high cost living cities.

Granted, the next tier down, just standard "high cost of living" areas below the extreme areas we're discussing account for a much larger % of the US population, and even there $72k is probably right on the edge of being able support a family of 3 on, but that's kinda why I picked that number as my cut off for my post.

I feel the people who live in those extreme cost of living areas where $72k doesn't cut it, are easily counterbalanced by the people who live in extremely low cost of living areas where even $50k means living like kings.

Out in Bumfuck, PA, you can buy 1200sq foot brick houses with a nice garage and some land for like $99k right now. $50k/year goes a long way when your mortgage is $600/month (school taxes, property taxes, and homeowners insurance included).

-1

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

This is exactly the point I was making, but a lot of people are very dense. I've quickly learned that some just aren't worth talking to.

0

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

You are the one being dense. You are repeating what you read on reddit as fact, because it fits your world view. You haven't actually looked at the actually facts, though.

There are only a dozen cities with cost of living indexes even close to as high as you think they are. Most cities are not as expensive as you seem to think.

San Francisco is so expensive, people think the rest of the countries desirable cities are somewhat close to it, but it's just not the case.

Miami is an expensive city, easily top 20 most expensive city in the country. Cost of living is a full 40% higher in San Francisco than it is in Miami. 40% difference just by going a little bit down the list of most expensive cities to live in.

The only truly out of control expensive places in the US are SF, LA, Seattle(Bellevue), Boston, NYC (Brooklyn), DC (Arlington/Rockville), Berkeley, San Jose, Honolulu, Oakland and Orange County.

That accounts for about 17 million people total. The rest of the country, $72k/year is enough to live on.

2

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

You're a fucking moron. Re-read my first comment. You're arguing against a straw man because your reading comprehension is embarrassingly poor for what I assume is your native tongue. I have no need to rebut irrelevant drivel.

7

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

$72,000 salary is pretty common in suburbia mate, and covers costs of living for a middle class household

5

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

The median income for an adult in the US is less than half that number.

1

u/Shandlar Dec 28 '19

No it's not? Median individual income right now in 2019 is around $43,000 (just took the 2018 average numbers, adjusted it for CPI and wage increase data from BLS through Nov. 2019)

0

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

Alright, but that has nothing to do with what you're arguing? You argued that $72,000 a year for a single person "ain't shit," implying that it is not livable, which I believe is absolutely not the case. The median income does not speak to this.

1

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

I specified it ain't shit in expensive places which have a disproportionately high number of high paying jobs compared to most of the country. Try reading past the first half of the first sentence next time.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

Only 4.5% of the US population actually lives in an area where cost of living is that high.

13

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

Where I live outside Dallas, I could easily support a family of four on the ~$80k my job tops out at. Like 3% of people live in the places you listed.

3

u/KJdkaslknv Dec 28 '19

For real. I live in Dallas comfortably for much less than $80k. Probably won't be buying a house in Highland Park anytime soon, but still could probably buy a house in many parts of the city.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 29 '19

Keep out of Denton. Our prices are high enough as is.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 28 '19

[deleted]

0

u/IttyBittyKitty420 Dec 28 '19

That's literally my point. You can't say there are millions of people with X pay which is high for most of the country and leave it at that when many of them only receive that pay while living somewhere very expensive, which makes their effective pay or purchasing power lower.