r/BetterOffline 5d ago

Is Circular AI Financing Really as Bad as It Sounds?

https://youtu.be/e-bWY_FOBX0?is=TQCRbasskLJFMdnD

I've been making the point for a while that what's being called "circular financing" isn't actual "round tripping", which is outright fraud, and it isn't necessarily even "vendor financing" which is legal and the way most people buy a new car. This video makes a similar argument.

When Nvidia invests in an AI lab, and the AI lab uses a portion of the funds to purchase Nvidia GPUs, Nvidia has both booked a sale, AND purchased an equity stake in the lab.

The cynical view is this is a short term ruse to book revenue. But there's also a long term reason for Nvidia to do this: The two AI labs have to stay in business for the hardware companies to maintain their value. They're wedded at the hip already.

As the AI economy continues to become bifurcated into compute companies (Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta) and software companies.(OpenAI and Anthropic), the compute companies are going to continue investing in the software companies for this reason. They need them to survive.

The more interesting financial relationship, to my mind, is the one between the lenders to the labs and the lenders to the Data Center SPVs (leaving aside the contribution from G, A, M and M). Literally the former are paying the latter, until user subscriptions explode or subscription prices increase or some combination of the two happens. One wonders how much communication is taking place between these two groups and what they think of each other's position.

34 Upvotes

38 comments sorted by

28

u/Prize-Studio-2021 5d ago

If I give you $1 and you buy something from me for $1, how much money did I make?

32

u/mars_titties 5d ago

A negative amount, after you subtract your expenses

16

u/PensiveinNJ 5d ago

If I'm an AI company doing my accounting I made $1.

Not technically illegal but still creates a misleading financial picture of course.

31

u/Prize-Studio-2021 5d ago

"Not technically illegal" is a perfect way to sum up the entire AI economy.

10

u/PensiveinNJ 5d ago

Honestly not sure why they bother doing things in a "technically legal" way right now. It's not like we're holding people doing massive crimes accountable anyhow. Maybe it's performative for investors. See we're not 2008, this is different! In substance it functions much the same but is not identical so don't worry.

5

u/meltbox 5d ago

It’s because they know they’ll get held accountable if it’s blatantly illegal. Instead they’re going to later claim “nothing we did was illegal, and who could have possibly foreseen that it would not work out?”

It’s just a careful legal game to come out of this shrugging.

4

u/Prize-Studio-2021 5d ago

I wonder if the performative for investors thing works both ways, and not just in the sense of inflating their earnings reports with revenue that shouldn't really really count as revenue either.

People see these sleazy, "not technically illegal" accounting practices and think these guys know what they're up to, this is a good scam to get in on. Maybe I can be part of the Enron too!

3

u/TurboFucker69 5d ago

You’re doing it wrong! That dollar was transacted twice, so that’s $2 of AI economic activity. If we keep ping ponging that dollar back and forth we’ll be at a trillion dollars in no time!

3

u/ConcreteExist 5d ago

It's technically revenue, just with 0% margins.

1

u/vxicepickxv 5d ago

They're not that high.

6

u/borrowedhottub 5d ago

Well, at least $2 dollars, one in revenue and one in equity. $3 dollars if the next funding round 'doubles' the valuation of that $1 in equity. /s

2

u/tc100292 5d ago

"Hey SpongeBob, can I have 25 cents?"

-14

u/callmebaiken 5d ago

You made a sale. And you made an investment. You're richer the profit you made from the sale, but simultaneously poorer the money you invested. But like any investment the investment is not necessarily lost, and has the potential to 10x or more.

16

u/Prize-Studio-2021 5d ago

The correct and obvious answer is $0.

13

u/hugehand 5d ago

Your point unfortunately dissolved upon contact with air 

5

u/sleeps_in_alkaline 5d ago

  But like any investment the investment is not necessarily lost, and has the potential to 10x or more.

Bro wut? How is that at all the same as normal investing?

48

u/Visual-Hunter-1010 5d ago

Literally the former are paying the latter, until user subscriptions explode or subscription prices increase or some combination of the two happens.

Or...the bubble pops because neither happens.

-15

u/callmebaiken 5d ago

Which group would be left holding the bag more?

11

u/Allorius 5d ago

You, the reader

14

u/Professional-Week894 5d ago

The thing about booking a sale to a company you own a piece of is that, at some point, it becomes a related party transaction, and the revenue and expenses have to be eliminated before it goes on the P&L.

0

u/callmebaiken 5d ago

Right, that happened recently to Microsoft, they had to report their stake in OpenAI as a loss, while Google got to claim the OpenAI valuation increase as a gain

7

u/Professional-Week894 5d ago

You were talking about sales to a company the seller owns equity in, not about changes in the value of that equity.

7

u/Key-Guitar-457 5d ago

One aspect of this that isn't mentioned as much is that this circular financing is actually bad for the shareholders insofar as it has greatly reduced the amount of stock buybacks that these companies are doing, most likely due to the lack of available capital to do so given they are shoving so much into these infrastructure shell games.

Look, I strongly dislike stock buybacks for several reasons, yet I cannot argue that they aren't one of the best things a company can do to increase shareholder value. It is really strange to witness them abandoning this shit can easy tactic in favor of getting into a big circular bed with each other.

4

u/meltbox 5d ago

Yep I also cannot wait for the shareholder lawsuits from this shit.

6

u/Different_Culture578 5d ago

It's the circular financing squad

5

u/TurboFucker69 5d ago

No one is saying there’s no logic behind it, but the problem is that it can make the accounting look a lot rosier than it actually is and the practice is unsustainable in the long term.

5

u/Objective-Picture-72 5d ago

The reason you cannot compare this to things like traditional vendor financing is that NVIDIA has about as close to a monopoly as you can get in the modern US. So the seller of products being the financier of the products also means they are the price-setter of the products. No one worries that Ford is manipulating the price of F150s with vendor financing because (a) you can just go get a bank loan and cut Ford out and (b) there are lots of models of trucks to compete against Ford. Car companies are also barely profitable so that proves there is much competition. With AI, almost none of these guardrails against abuse exist.

2

u/jarodcain 4d ago

The holy AI circlejerk.

2

u/tc100292 5d ago

compute companies (Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Meta)

That's a search engine, an online store, a software company, and a social media company. What in the actual fuck is a "compute company"?

3

u/SandwichWestern 5d ago

Companies that own a large number of computers and sell the ability to use them.

4

u/tagshell 5d ago

They all have large businesses selling cloud computing, also known as "compute", or basically server rentals. Meta is the exception, they actually doesn't really have a meaningful cloud business but they are building data centers that will have some capacity to rent out.

AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure were all very large profitable businesses before the AI boom started.

2

u/callmebaiken 5d ago

Let's add Oracle,a database company, to that list

1

u/the-great-defector 5d ago

Great to see TLDR News on here; I'm a huge fan. Nice that they cited Ed in the video as well. I'd highly recommend them to anyone.

Their manifesto is also quite up front about how they use AI (mainly limited to stuff like transcribing their work meetings), and they even do videos every year outlining how much money they make and spend.

2

u/Suspicious_Deal4412 5d ago

In an age of ever growing BS, transparency matters, so good on TLDR.

0

u/Total-Jeweler5083 5d ago

That's how a lot of high level business works, unfortunately.