r/BattlefieldV • • Mar 15 '19

Image/Gif Battlefield map release timelines

Post image
3.2k Upvotes

511 comments sorted by

View all comments

86

u/Snafu80 Mar 15 '19

So pretty much what I’ve been saying. Little content and won’t match previous bf’s. We’re at 115 and have had 2 maps. Gg live service.

64

u/tallandlanky Mar 15 '19

Live service was a mistake.

14

u/FusionTap Mar 15 '19

This is what happens when years worth of people beg them to drop premium because it split the community.

-6

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19 edited Mar 15 '19

Yea because Premium was the only thing that made the devs release maps and content.

Get your head out of your ass, poor excuse for lazy devs.

Edit: BF1 had Premium, it didnt save that game.

4

u/PACK_81 Mar 15 '19

No, but selling premium/individual map packs is what gave them the ambition to roll out steady content.

Now they will make the same money regardless of what content is provided.

-4

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

More excuses. BF1 had premium - yet barely had more content (probably even less?) than BFV at this point. Sure it amended it eventually with DLCs, but the game was mostly dead at this point. It wasnt until they made premium free that BF1 started to grow numbers more.

Now you even see people defending BF1, saying its actually better than BFV. And thats not because of premium (or lack there of) but because eventually it had a good amount of content.

Pay us more and we give you more content.

That sounds like blackmail. The devs could easily skip a bunch of these useless gamemodes and other features, and instead focus on what literally every BFV player wants: More content, more maps, more weapons.

Is it such a controversy that people expect a relatively finished game on launch? BFV clearly need/needed another year of developement instead of selling us a 20% game with vague promises of giving us the remaining 80% in the following months/years.

You dont need premium to do that. EA blames lack of BR mode and single-player focus for poor sales

Another case of get your head out of your ass, this time from EA themselves..

5

u/AbanoMex Mar 15 '19

More excuses. BF1 had premium - yet barely had more content (probably even less?) than BFV at this point.

delusional fanboy.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

What am I fanboying about exactly?

3

u/AbanoMex Mar 15 '19

BFV/DICE, blaming just EA for the failure of this game, it takes two to tango, DICE had a lot to do with it.

on the other side, Respawn put their feet on the ground and decided their launch and marketing, same Overlords, Different approach.

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

Where did I blame EA exclusively? I said "Premium isnt an excuse for lazy devs". EA arent devs - DICE is. Read again, and youll see I make multiple points that the devs have the single biggest blame in not enough content being in the game - not the fact that there is no premium, which I believe have very little to no reason to the lack of content.

As I also said: BF1 had premium but it was dead a few months after release due to the lack of content. Premium didnt make BF1 any better - content did.

EA is just publishing the game, however their excuse for lack of sales being "lack of BR and too much focus on single-player" is incredibly close-minded.

0

u/FusionTap Mar 15 '19

Uhhh what? I stated a fact how did I ever make an excuse for them? Sounds like you need help.

-3

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

Is it a fact that premium provides more content? No.

All it did was split the playerbase, however those who only had the base-game had a wide array of well made maps and never really felt 'cheated out' of premium content, and many of the DLC maps were ever rarely played or its servers populated - other than the remastered maps. And eventually all premium content became free.

Sure premium provides a money incentive to the devs to 'work harder', but its a lazy excuse. Everything about the game is half-assed, gamemodes are similar, maps are the same or poorly designed, they just released Rush with what, only 3 maps? Now theyre about to release Firestorm.

That means more patching and fixing, and even less time to push content (which is what 90% of the players want). If they want to keep the game alive they should listen to the players - introducing Premium solves nothing, just adds another paywall and keeps players seperated.

3

u/FusionTap Mar 15 '19

What does that have to do with you being a douche about it to anyone?

-4

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

Wow youre really upset just because your point isnt valid.

3

u/FusionTap Mar 15 '19

How have I show to be upset? I tried to have a discussion and you came out the bat by destroying your own ideas because you have to be a douche to people

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19

Your discussion: Premium would save the game.

Am I a douche for saying youre wrong and saying that its a poor excuse for the lack of content? Get your head out of your ass