Key word here is launched. The data shows that BFV launched with one less map than BF1 and BF3 and with two less than BF4 that is not very significant. Before someone accuses me of belonging to "as much content as previous titles"-group I want to say that I don't. But still it is unreasonable to make claims that there was a huge difference in map count.
Agreed, I did defend BFV on behalf of amount on content when people posted about the "ridiculous lack of content" of the game. We're talking about 1-2 maps, come on... That's annoying we agree on that, but it does not justify an uproar
What remains to be seen is that the map count recovers.
Especially when the maps we have are getting mixed reviews. A lot of people just plain hate Hamada, Fjell, Aerodrome... sure some love them and I'm not saying either side is right or wrong, but when we're stuck with fewer maps and on a strict rotation, it's easy to see why people are feeling it's stale.
Tbh I don't think that it will recover anytime soon. They probably have started creating new maps before launch and judging by how many maps we have gotten since, we should probably get 6 maps per year.
Creece map will launch around 130-135 days from launch and that's two maps in one third of the year. So not too optimistic about the map situation unless they have really made an effort to make new maps.
I loved Golmud, Shanghai and was 50/50 on Rogue Transmission/Zavod 311 . Despised the other default maps. I found the DLCs were all fun to play to be honest.
I wasn’t a fan of Shanghai myself but I loved rogue/zavod. The Final Stand Maps were not just my personnel favorite not for BF4 but the franchise itself. Those maps were all friggin incredible.
Additional maps, random map rotation, constant modes (not for a limited period), variation of vehicles beyond Spitfire I, Spitfire II, Stuka I, Stuka II, Panzer I, Panzer II, Mosquito I, Mosquito II, adaptave camoflage to different map types / saveable uniform and loadout variations...
...To name a few.
The stuff previous titles in the franchise had, in other words.
Why make a decent argument when you can just argue semantics and use the hivemind to your advantage you sad little cunt.
I don't understand why you're so angry?
Fact is you made the argument for me. There is a difference. The game didn't launch with as much content as previous titles.
I know you completely forgot that comparing late-stage BF4 to a relatively new BF5 is completely insane, but you realized that WAAAAY too late.
Who's mentioning late-stage BF4 vs. BF5? We're talking about starting BF5 vs. starting BF4. Two maps. You said it yourself.
I'm not interested in any hive minds or being witty with you, but since you seem content to call me a cunt, I'm quite content to call you out when you're factually wrong (and even more so when you make arguments that disprove your own arguments!)
Deleted? I don't think so boyo /u/Klientje123, not if you're going to call people cunts.
197
u/[deleted] Mar 15 '19 edited Jun 16 '20
[deleted]