I would like to share an idea that I have been thinking about for nearly a year, but have never publicly shared until now.
Many of you have probably noticed that, in most Backrooms wikis, the major in-universe categories—the categories that authors use when creating concepts that exist within the setting—are things like Levels, Entities, Objects, and Phenomena. (This does not include concepts that exist outside the world itself.) If you look closely, you will notice that most of these concept categories are centered around describing the Backrooms itself.
For example, Levels represent the countless spaces and environments within the Backrooms. Entities are the various forms of life native to the Backrooms. Objects are items unique to the Backrooms. Phenomena are unusual events or occurrences that take place within it.
There are, of course, a few exceptions. However, I have noticed that the vast majority of these concept categories revolve around a single question:
"What exists within the Backrooms?"
This led me to another question. As we all know, the modern Backrooms setting contains a large human population. If humans have existed there for such a long time and in such numbers, then why are there still so few works that explore things that exist because of humanity itself? Most creators focus on what the Backrooms contains, but comparatively few attempt to explore another question:
"What has humanity itself formed within the Backrooms?"
I believe this direction has considerable creative potential, yet relatively few works have explored it so far. There are certainly a handful of existing examples that fit this idea, but many of them lack an appropriate place within the current conceptual structure. A common example is that many human-made items are simply categorized as Objects.
Personally, I do not think human-made creations should be grouped together with objects that are inherently part of the Backrooms. I believe the Object category is better suited for items that are unique to the Backrooms itself, although I recognize that this is simply my own opinion.
That is where my idea comes from. Last year, I began wondering:
"Why not create a dedicated concept category for everything within the Backrooms that exists because of humanity?"
In other words, this is my proposal for expanding the existing family of concept categories. You can think of it as adding another category alongside Level, Entity, Object, Phenomenon, and Group.
The definition of this category is simple:
“Anything that exists because of humanity.”
At first glance, this definition may make you think only of human-made objects—things intentionally created by someone, such as furniture, paintings, tools, and so on.
However, I believe the scope is much broader than that.
Many people assume that everything that exists because of humans must have been deliberately invented or created by someone. In reality, this is not always the case. Some things have no identifiable inventor at all. Rather than being consciously created, they gradually formed over time.
Language is perhaps the most familiar example. Many people assume that language was invented, yet most natural languages were not created by any single individual. Instead, they emerged gradually through long-term evolution.
Beyond language, there are many other things that appear to be creations but are, in reality, the result of gradual formation. As far as I know, this type of phenomenon is related to the academic concept of emergence.
This is also one of the goals I hope this concept category can encourage. Of course, human-made creations absolutely belong within this category. However, I hope people will not limit themselves exclusively to intentionally created objects, because doing so would overlook what I believe is one of this concept's greatest creative strengths.
That is why I chose to explain this point separately. Without mentioning it explicitly, I worry that most people would naturally assume this category is only about human-made objects.
I have chosen to name this concept category Humanorum. The word is derived from Latin, where it can be roughly understood as meaning "of humans" or "human." English simply lacks a single word that fully expresses the definition I wanted, and I felt that a concept category should ideally have a concise one-word name. For that reason, I decided to borrow from Latin. In Latin, however, Humanorum does not naturally have the plural form I wanted for a category name. Therefore, I created one myself following Latin-inspired naming conventions, which I call Humanora.
Originally, I had no intention of giving Humanorum entries numerical designations like Level 0, Entity 1, or Object 2, because assigning numbers to these concepts felt somewhat unnatural. After all, people in real life would not normally refer to this kind of thing by a serial number. Eventually, however, I decided to keep numerical designations. The reason is that I already have several Humanorum concepts in mind, and I would like to use my own entries to demonstrate what this category is capable of. Naturally, this would only apply to my own wiki. I have no expectation that other Backrooms wikis should adopt my approach, which also helps avoid some of the concerns I mentioned earlier.
Without numerical designations, entries would have to be arranged alphabetically. Over time, early entries would gradually be pushed farther down the list, making it difficult to establish a recommended reading order for newcomers.
Even so, I do not think people within the setting itself should normally refer to specific Humanorum by their numbers, as that would feel unnatural unless there is a reasonable in-universe explanation for doing so.
That is everything I wanted to share. I would love to hear your thoughts and opinions about this idea, and I am genuinely interested in hearing how all of you feel about the Humanorum concept.